Posted on 12/06/2005 6:23:18 PM PST by AZ_Cowboy
All W has to do is take a meatloaf sandwich with him and he can have his way with Mike.
Bingo. You ARE Brilliant.
Sounds like the court case is screwed, is there a strategy for winning?
If so, don't mention what it is though.
That is a remarkably accurate description of those on the gun-grabbing side. They are convinced that criminals will abide by laws which seek to disarm them. That criminals regularly violate laws notwithstanding, for some strange and unknown reason, once disarmed, the criminals will remain so.
Does this mean that old relic, Mike Wallace, is still alive? Amazing. I thought he died years ago.
YES, and thanks for laying out some facts on this despicable senior.
mc
That would hurt having ask your son ask Prez of the US sit down for interview with the OLD MAN OUCH LOLOLOL!!!!!
It's octogenarian,Spelled with an O
Mike Wallace is the male version of Helen Thomas. Frozen out and ignored while he rants.
1st question: Are you a socialist.?..
2nd question: Are you a leftist.?..
3rd question: Are you a progressive.?..
4th question: At what age did you appreciate Karl Marx as NOT being raving MoonBat.?.
5th question: Why not a 60Min.; expose' on massive democrat party voter fraud.?..
6th question: How did you totally overlook Chinagate as possible TREASON.?..
7th question: Mike is America a democracy.?.
**Note:.. Each question to be commented on as 60min spins any interview to expose 60min as a leftist democrat party agitprop outlet..
If you were doing a story about a group of terrorists and found out they were about to ambush a busload of journalists would you simply report the event or try to warn them?
We already know what the answer would be if it were a busload of American soldiers......
I thought Mike Wallace was dead.
WALLACE: Because he pays attention strictly to Karl Rove and that’s why from the very beginning that Karl Rove will not permit him to sit down with me.
I'm sure that Chrissy or Mikey would never agree to be interviewed by their political enemies with said enemies in charge of editing the interview for broadcast.
Why would President Bush give them free reign to attack him, especially after Dan Rather and CBS crudely attacked both President Bush 41 and President Bush 43.
You don't have to be Karl Rove to figure that out!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.