Skip to comments.
Giving Up on New Orelans
Los Angeles Times ^
| December 6, 2005
| Mike Tidwell
Posted on 12/06/2005 3:56:27 PM PST by HoHoeHeaux
We may as well abandon the Big Easy because the White House is killing a plan to protect the city from the next Katrina.
By Mike Tidwell
MIKE TIDWELL is the author of "Bayou Farewell: The Rich Life and Tragic Death of Louisiana's Cajun Coast" (Pantheon, 2003).
AS WE NEAR the 100-day mark since Hurricane Katrina hit, it's time we ended our national state of denial and abandon New Orleans for good.
We should call it quits not because New Orleans can't be made relatively safe from hurricanes. It can be. And not because to do so is more trouble than it's worth. It's not. Instead, the hammers and brooms and chain saws should all be put away and the city permanently boarded up because the Bush administration has already given New Orleans a quiet kiss of death.
Although he has encouraged city residents to return home and declared "we will do whatever it takes" to save the city, President Bush last month refused the one thing New Orleans simply cannot live without: a restored network of barrier islands and coastal wetlands.
Katrina destroyed the Big Easy and future Katrinas will do the same because 1 million acres of coastal islands and marshland vanished in Louisiana in the last century because of human interference.
http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-tidwell6dec06,0,2886301.story?coll=la-news-comment-opinions
(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...
TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events; US: Louisiana
KEYWORDS: barrierislands; bushsfault; hurricane; hurricanekatrina; katina; katrina; la; louisiana; miketidwell; neworleans; nola; tidwell; wetlands
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-92 next last
To: HoHoeHeaux
1 million acres of coastal islands and marshland vanished in Louisiana in the last century because of human interference
BAN THE HUMANS!!!!!!
To: HoHoeHeaux
President Bush last month refused the one thing New Orleans simply cannot live without: a restored network of barrier islands and coastal wetlands. God, alone, has the capability of restor[ing] a network of barrier islands and coastal wetlands ... that manmade activities have helped to destroy.
Not everything in this world can be fixed by throwing unlimited quantities of money at it. It is time for people to wake up and realize that.
3
posted on
12/06/2005 3:59:47 PM PST
by
caryatid
(Jolie Blonde, 'gardez donc, quoi t'as fait ...)
To: HoHoeHeaux
Ho-Hum. Another "BUSH'S FAULT!" article from the la slimes.
Liberal idiot 'journalists' are really getting stale.
4
posted on
12/06/2005 4:01:54 PM PST
by
GaltMeister
(“All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.”)
To: HoHoeHeaux
It is below sea level and sinking fast. It was a dumb place to put a city and it would be even dumber to rebuild it were it sits. Just have the downtown, the French Quarter, and the port.
As long as I can get Muffulettas at the Central Market, that is enough New Orleans for me.
To: HoHoeHeaux
We should call it quits not because New Orleans can't be made relatively safe from hurricanes. It can be.
Sure it can, all it takes is a few truck loads of dirt to raise the city to around 100' above sea level.
Question is is it worth it?
6
posted on
12/06/2005 4:02:51 PM PST
by
Mark was here
(How can they be called "Homeless" if their home is a field?.)
To: HoHoeHeaux
New and Improved Orleans (NIO) will be built on a different terrain - and with a different human material. I'd suggest Amish country of OH/PA.
7
posted on
12/06/2005 4:03:29 PM PST
by
GSlob
To: caryatid
Not to mention that the essential predicament is the choice between a navigable river and a sustainable city. If you get the channeled river, controlled to be navigable by freighters carrying the vast majority of ag exports from the middle third of the country, you don't get even distribution of the silt carried by the river. If you let the river meander, as it did prior to 1928, you cannot navigate in a practicable manner. One or the other, not both.
I spent very little time in New Orleans in the past - but by my general observation - it's an uphill argument for restoration of the city.
To: Mark was here
It is already mostly dirt from the delta build up. Personally, I would love to sell a few mountains of real limestone fill from any one of our many mountains.
We have a bunch of them and could easily sell a few and float them down the Missisip.. SMILE Problem Solved!
9
posted on
12/06/2005 4:07:45 PM PST
by
glowworm
( Liberalism is truly a mental condition...)
To: Mark was here
Sure it can, all it takes is a few truck loads of dirt to raise the city to around 100' above sea level. Do you have any idea how many cubic miles of dirt that would take?
10
posted on
12/06/2005 4:10:22 PM PST
by
Graybeard58
(Remember and pray for Sgt. Matt Maupin - MIA/POW- Iraq since 04/09/04)
To: Ninian Dryhope
It was a dumb place to put a city ... It was not a dumb place to put a city. They built the city on the first high land upriver from the Gulf of Mexico. THEY did not build in the swamps 300 years ago ... that was left for the folks of the early 20th century who believed themselves invincible. The old city ... the French Quarter, the CBD, the Garden District, and Uptown/Carrollton appear to have fared well ... anything beyond Freret [away from the River], I hear, flooded badly.
Invincibility obviously was a flawed concept.
I second the motion on the Muffalettas from the Central Market. And they always had big jars of my all time favorite Jordan Almonds ... my mother would buy a nickel's worth for me when I was a little girl ... I remember walking around all day clutching that little brown bag ... Old times there are not forgotten ....
11
posted on
12/06/2005 4:10:36 PM PST
by
caryatid
(Jolie Blonde, 'gardez donc, quoi t'as fait ...)
To: caryatid
It seems like only yesterday the greens were lamenting the lost swamps of southern Iraq. Ruined for all time when Saddam drained them you know. Forever dried up.
'Till the US got there.
12
posted on
12/06/2005 4:14:32 PM PST
by
Cyber Liberty
(© 2005, Ravin' Lunatic since 4/98)
To: HoHoeHeaux
Any wonder why the LAT continues to lose readership?
13
posted on
12/06/2005 4:16:07 PM PST
by
facedown
(Armed in the Heartland)
To: Graybeard58
Do you have any idea how many cubic miles of dirt that would take?
Enough to bury the current city.
Maybe it would be best to save wear and tear on all the trucks, and let those who want to assume the risks, do so at their own peril and live in a submarine with a screen door.
14
posted on
12/06/2005 4:16:34 PM PST
by
Mark was here
(How can they be called "Homeless" if their home is a field?.)
To: HoHoeHeaux
15
posted on
12/06/2005 4:17:12 PM PST
by
sit-rep
(If you acquire, hit it again to verify...)
To: HoHoeHeaux
I know LAtimes is only sliming Bush here, but I for one do not want to have my tax dollars sent to pay for anymore LA, FL or any other damn state that has me bailing our coastal casinos and mobile home parks year after year.
FEMA should not be paying for any of this.
The states should, its their issue.
To: caryatid
Exactly. I suspect NO is going to be a much smaller city with the people mostly living in the historical high areas.
17
posted on
12/06/2005 4:19:01 PM PST
by
Knitting A Conundrum
(Act Justly, Love Mercy, and Walk Humbly With God Micah 6:8)
To: HoHoeHeaux
The start of Coastal island and marshland restoration began in April 2005, that phase was to be complete October 2005.
enter Hurricane. 64,000 MORE acres lost..
can these marshlands be restored in a year ? No
Can a Katrina like hurricane hit again in a year ? Yes
how long has this plan been on the table ? Think "pre-Bush"
18
posted on
12/06/2005 4:25:33 PM PST
by
stylin19a
(you can leed Freepers to spelchek, but you can't make 'em use it.)
To: HoHoeHeaux; All; abb; alnick; Bogey780; CajunConservative; cajungirl; caryatid; Comus; ...

** Louisiana PING **
[ If you would like on or off the LA Ping List please FReepmail
me and your name will be added to or taken off of the list. ]
19
posted on
12/06/2005 4:28:20 PM PST
by
caryatid
(Jolie Blonde, 'gardez donc, quoi t'as fait ...)
To: HoHoeHeaux
Curious:
Was this from the news or op-ed section of the LAT ?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-92 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson