Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FOREIGN OUTSOURCING OF CRITICAL MILITARY PARTS ( PATRIOT ALERT! )
United States Department of Defense ^ | 06 December 2005 | Chuck Wagner

Posted on 12/06/2005 1:21:54 PM PST by Robert Drobot

F-14 Program Builds Historic Business Bridge to Poland

PATUXENT RIVER , Md., Dec. 6, 2005 – For a people who first heard of it while they lived under Soviet influence, this U.S. Navy fighter aircraft is of great public interest.

Polish citizens invariably know it by name. Employees of PZL-Swidnik even refer to it with a hint of ownership – the F-14 Tomcat.

" The recent agreement paves the way for the eventual creation of long-term technical and economic benefits that will produce dividends for both the U.S. and Poland." -- Czes Covington

A business bridge between the U.S. Navy’s F-14 program and a Polish aerospace company is in many ways a first.

PZL’s construction of the transmitter bay access panel on the Tomcat’s fuselage is the first time a foreign company has contributed to the aircraft’s structure. It is also the first time the U.S. Navy has acquired a major aircraft part from a former East Block country.

The historic initiative is keeping the world’s most recognized fighter flying safely as it embarks on its last hurrah.

Early in September, F-14 squadrons VF-213 and VF-31 of Oceana Naval Air Station, Va. landed aboard the aircraft carrier U.S.S. Theodore Roosevelt for what will be their last Tomcat deployment before transitioning to the Super Hornet next year.

On many of these combat-proven aircraft -which average 15 years in service – wind-tossed refueling drogues have worn the panel during in-flight refueling.

“It was important that we had a plan to replace these panels before they reached the end of their service life. We had repaired them enough,” said Cmdr. Dino Ferrari, F-14 deputy program manager at Patuxent River Naval Air Station, Md.

As the deadline for closing down shop on the Tomcat crept closer, dwindling resources forced program planners to seek unconventional options.

They found answers in an unlikely place. Swidnik is a town of gray, communist-era apartment buildings not far from Poland’s eastern border with the Ukraine. The town grew up around the PZL factory, which now employs about 3,300 workers.

PZL began in 1954 building helicopters mostly for Russia and other nations under Soviet influence. PZL now builds or upgrades helicopter and aircraft parts for a growing list of recognized global defense industry players; Italy’s Agusta, France’s Latecoere and Dassault Aviation, Eurocopter Deutschland, Airbus and Bell. Czes Covington manages the Navy’s effort with PZL.

He is a 25-year veteran with Naval Air Systems Command at Patuxent River where he normally serves as integrated product team lead for F-14 structures and mechanical sub-systems. He sealed the deal with PZL and raised eyebrows on both sides of the Atlantic.

Evaluations of the panels received from PZL since mid-July indicate the hardware exceeds the Navy’s quality standards, according to Navy engineers assigned to the Tomcat Fleet Support Team at Jacksonville, Fla. All panels are expected to be delivered by the end of February 2006.

“The panels are complete and all-encompassing. When they are delivered, they can be taken out of the box and installed. The accessories such as the formation light and multiple fasteners are included and pre-installed,” said Covington.

The panels go directly from the shop floor to the fleet, where aircraft maintainers have been able to swiftly attach the panels in their prominent position near the cockpit. “Top Gun!” said Christian Rutkowski jerking a thumb into the air as he inspected a panel he recently painted.

He is a 30-year veteran at PZL who has witnessed the country’s dramatic transformation from state-controlled economy to free-market. He’s seen multiple times the 1986 film “Top Gun” which made the Tomcat into a global celebrity.

Machines on the PZL shop floor have been re-fitted with custom tooling derived from the original tools used by Grumman.

When production on the F-14 halted in 1992, the Navy took custody of the aircraft’s manufacturing specifications.

This has allowed the Naval Air Systems Command to work directly with PZL. Using the modified tools, PZL demonstrated that it could produce parts that meet the original equipment manufacturer’s specifications.

Three American companies manufacture at least 50 percent of the panel hardware under terms of the contract. Pryer Tool and Machine Co. of Tulsa, Okla. manufactures the panel skins.

Alcore of Edgewood, Md. produces its one-piece honeycomb core. Aurora Flight Science of Bridgeport, W.Va. packages the various parts into kits for shipment to Poland.

Covington first considered purchasing from a former East Block country in 1996. His team conducted a market survey that included Hungary, the Czech Republic, Slovakia and Poland. The decision fell on Poland, then on PZL.

Contract discussions began in 2001 with approval from the Defense and State departments. The willingness of the Navy, State and Defense department to work with Poland isn’t solely a question of cost savings.

Poland has proved a reliable U.S. ally since the end of the Cold War, and has been among the U.S.’s staunchest allies in Iraq. U.S. officials have been eager to establish ties with Poland that both reward and solidify the relationship.

“I think the cooperation between the Navy and the factory is right in line with our mission. It is one more tie in a robust military relationship and robust commercial relationship,” said James B. Bond, press attaché for the American embassy in Warsaw.

“We have fully realized not only the purely military and commercial benefits but also the political advantages of bilateral cooperation and this U.S.-Poland ... program in particular,” said Col. Stan Prusinski, chief of the Office of Defense Cooperation at the embassy. “A project that brings about savings to U.S. taxpayers, creates jobs in both countries, and generates favorable publicity in Poland is a dream come true.”

Although the contract with the Navy is small compared to the company’s other business ventures, PZL officials see it as an important nod to the future.

“It is a kind of test to see if professional cooperation is possible. We will try to prove it is a good idea for both sides to take another step. We are open to that,” said Ryszard Cukierman, PZL’s commercial director and vice president.

Covington also views cooperation on the Tomcat panel as a hint of future possibilities.

“The recent agreement paves the way for the eventual creation of long-term technical and economic benefits that will produce dividends for both the U.S. and Poland,” said Covington.

His administrative team was recently successful in establishing an agreement between Poland’s Military Institute of Armament Technology in Zielonka, PZL and Naval Air Command that would qualify a light-weight, Polish-designed armor protection package that can be integrated into a helicopter’s structure.

The agreement again extends to U.S.-based small businesses to help with the qualification and manufacturing program.

Curt Carey, Naval Air Systems Command’s AH-1W Class Desk, would like to see Covington’s team integrating the protection into the Marine Corps Cobra helicopter.

He believes their objective could be achieved quickly enough to make a difference in Iraq.

The team hopes to perform gunfire testing of two materials by the end of the year, so that follow-on, full-scale qualification testing of the completed project can occur in early 2006.

“Within the next year, we could produce a low-cost, high-quality component for a U.S. military helicopter which will provide the protection that our troops need in Iraq,” said Covington.

“This success is part of our team’s continuing contribution to the Navy-wide goal of delivering the right force, with the right readiness, and at the right cost,” said Rear Adm. David Venlet, Program Executive Officer for Tactical Aircraft Programs. Venlet oversees the efforts of PMA 241. “You’ll see much more of this as the Naval Aviation Enterprise continues to streamline development and procurement of the systems we send forward to our fleet warfighters.”

The Naval Aviation Enterprise is a partnership among Naval leadership to optimize processes that maintain current readiness while investing in future readiness.

The enterprise concept focuses Naval aviation on the single fleet-driven metric of producing aircraft ready for tasking at reduced cost.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: capability; economy; layoffs; readyness; security; stupid; unemployment; war
“This success is part of our team’s continuing contribution to the Navy-wide goal of delivering the right force, with the right readiness, and at the right cost,” said Rear Adm. David Venlet, Program Executive Officer for Tactical Aircraft Programs. Venlet oversees the efforts of PMA 241. “You’ll see much more of this as the Naval Aviation Enterprise continues to streamline development and procurement of the systems we send forward to our fleet warfighters.”

Screw the American worker and his family......oh yea don't want to forget the payment for this outsourcing comes straight out of your almost empty taxpaying pockets. Merry Christmas, suckers!

1 posted on 12/06/2005 1:21:56 PM PST by Robert Drobot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Robert Drobot
Cmdr. Dino Ferrari

???

2 posted on 12/06/2005 1:30:23 PM PST by Red Badger (Dan rather didn't say "Courage", he said "Couric"..................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert Drobot
The doors that open out-sourcing also open in-sourcing, the latter, growing 5x the rate of the former.
3 posted on 12/06/2005 1:35:11 PM PST by mnehring (God, forgive me for forgetting to love my neighbors, I was too busy with the latest boycott.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert Drobot

So applying the same logic, Poland should not be buying 48 F-16s from Lockheed, right?


4 posted on 12/06/2005 1:46:47 PM PST by hc87
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hc87

"So applying the same logic, Poland should not be buying 48 F-16s from Lockheed, right?"

Any further use of logic and reason will result in your banishment or suspension, you have now been officially warned.


5 posted on 12/06/2005 1:51:20 PM PST by BeHoldAPaleHorse (MORE COWBELL! MORE COWBELL! (CLANK-CLANK-CLANK))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Robert Drobot
“We have fully realized not only the purely military and commercial benefits but also the political advantages of bilateral cooperation and this U.S.-Poland ... program in particular,” said Col. Stan Prusinski, chief of the Office of Defense Cooperation at the embassy. “A project that brings about savings to U.S. taxpayers, creates jobs in both countries, and generates favorable publicity in Poland is a dream come true.”

This is great news... There are plenty of stories about outsourcing that make my skin crawl but this one is great. This is a dream come true!

6 posted on 12/06/2005 1:54:14 PM PST by humint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert Drobot

Vanishing vendors. Once a subcontractor goes out of business it is near impossible to get them to open their production line again. And even if they do, the cost is astronomical.

That is a constant dilemma for the military and their contractors. When spare parts supplies are budgeted, they are based on the expected life of the part in use and the expected life of the airframe. When they run out, they run out.

In this case, having Poland build some panels worth a few hundred dollars and then having them buy a few dozen F-16's worth hundreds of millions of dollars seems like a very unbalanced trade to me. Although it's in our best interests as hundreds of highly skilled engineers and builders keep their jobs right here in the good 'ole US of A.

I think the Navy did it right. JMO

SZ


7 posted on 12/06/2005 1:55:35 PM PST by SZonian (Tagline???? I don't need no stinkin' tagline!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert Drobot
Like, this is it? Nothing new will be made in the future? And if so where will new industries, making new products get the willing, trained, skilled workers? What, are you a....a....sniff...snivel...a victim? Some kind of serf to a specific company? Bought and owned?
8 posted on 12/06/2005 1:57:18 PM PST by Leisler (HEY LEFTY! FREED TIBET YET?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling

I am happy to see the Poles get this business.


9 posted on 12/06/2005 2:03:03 PM PST by GarySpFc (De Oppresso Liber)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Robert Drobot; SmithL; Fedora

Don't overlook the strategic significance of a solvent and loyal ally in Europe as an available military base. Poland well remembers the horrors of both German and Russian Socialist tyrants.



10 posted on 12/06/2005 2:12:25 PM PST by The Spirit Of Allegiance (SAVE THE BRAINFOREST! Boycott the RED Dead Tree Media & NUKE the DNC Class Action Temper Tantrum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GarySpFc

DITTO!


11 posted on 12/06/2005 2:12:45 PM PST by The Spirit Of Allegiance (SAVE THE BRAINFOREST! Boycott the RED Dead Tree Media & NUKE the DNC Class Action Temper Tantrum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Robert Drobot

the new U.N military


12 posted on 12/06/2005 2:27:59 PM PST by cope85
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert Drobot

Who didn't know this? Raytheon, who builds weapon systems for the US military, makes all of their parts in Mexico.


13 posted on 12/06/2005 3:04:43 PM PST by Alien Gunfighter (Socialist liberals never imagine themselves as peasants under their 'perfect' socialist regime)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hc87

Don't dare mention those maintenance agreements. Some real money there.


14 posted on 12/06/2005 3:08:49 PM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson