Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"Gender-Fair" Oppression: Our boys are hurting in school. Thank the feminists.
National Review Online ^ | December 06, 2005 | Kate O'Beirne

Posted on 12/06/2005 8:36:56 AM PST by xsysmgr

In his welcome Washington Post "Outlook" piece, “Disappearing Act: Where Have the Men Gone? No Place Good,” Michael Gurian reports that colleges and universities across the country are “grappling with the case of the mysteriously vanishing male.” The author of books on the compelling brain research that reveals significant sex differences in learning styles notes that men make up only 43 percent of college students. Gurian laments that we have failed to react to a “significant crisis” that damages the life prospects of millions of young men. He marshals the evidence of boys in trouble and effectively demands attention to their plight.

But he doesn’t explain who is to blame for boys’ alienation from our current schooling regime. So I will. It's radical feminist academics, theorists, and activists.

Gurian explains that boys “dominate the failure statistics in our schools” beginning in elementary school and continuing through high school. Boys lag behind girls in reading ability by 1½ years, a disparity that persists into college. This diminished educational achievement consigns young men to the lowest-level jobs, lands plenty in prison, and takes many out of the long-term marriage pool. He counsels that we abandon the “boys-are-privileged-but-the-girls-are-shortchanged emphasis of the last 20 years.” No kidding. This “emphasis” that has so disadvantaged our boys is the fundamental tenet of feminist educational policy that is subsidized by tens of millions of public dollars in the name of a phony “educational equity.”

Take reading achievement, as one example of what feminism has wrought. With the federal government’s clout and cash, feminists have dictated the rewriting of textbooks to conform to their notions of gender equality. At its 1973 convention, NOW resolved to take “dramatic action” to see that dangerous sex-role stereotypes were erased from textbooks, and within a year they had the Women’s Educational Equity Act to advance their campaign with funding for alternative curricula. The editors, publishers, administrators, bureaucrats, and teachers’ unions that make up the feminized education establishment have eagerly adopted the feminists’ destructive gender agenda.

The result is what NYU psychology professor Paul Vitz calls “Wonder Woman and the Wimp” stories that little boys understandably have little interest in reading. Sandra Stotsky, a reading specialist and research scholar at Northeastern University explains, “Gone are the inspiring biographies of the most important American presidents, inventors, scientists, and entrepreneurs. No military valor, no high adventure. On the other hand, stories about adventurous and brave women abound.”

Peggy Orenstein is one of the feminist theorists who welcomes the “gender-fair” regime that has turned our classrooms into reeducation camps for our sons. She has noted approvingly that “perhaps for the first time, the boys are the ones looking through the window” when classrooms are adorned with women’s pictures and bookcases are crammed with women’s biographies.

We parents of boys have meekly allowed gender warriors like Peggy Orenstein to treat our sons like unindicted coconspirators in history’s gender crimes, while parents of girls permit their daughters to be patronized as helpless victims of a phantom, crippling sex bias in America’s schools.

Michael Gurian notes the casualties without identifying who created the battlefield for their campaign of intimidation and indoctrination.

Kate O’Beirne names more names in her forthcoming book, Women Who Make the World Worse: and How Their Radical Feminist Assault Is Ruining Our Schools, Families, Military, and Sports.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: boys; education; equality; feminism; gurian; malestudents; men; obeirne
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

1 posted on 12/06/2005 8:36:57 AM PST by xsysmgr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: xsysmgr

Terrific. While China and India continue to churn out more engineers and scientists, our educational system is busy trying to find politically correct ways to drive members of an entire gender away from a college education.


2 posted on 12/06/2005 8:39:45 AM PST by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xsysmgr
It's too late. This problem can't be fixed at this point - the only way out is to press on through and let higher education collapse of its own dead weight. For young people who want to accomplish anything, it's back to the "Abe Lincoln reading law books by the fireplace" modality - homeschooling or self-study.

Fortunately, we live in a time when the Internet makes so much learning available for free that formal education is becoming superfluous, anyway.

3 posted on 12/06/2005 8:42:50 AM PST by Mr. Jeeves ("When government does too much, nobody else does much of anything." -- Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xsysmgr

Time to launch the 'Malenist' movement!

PS: Er, what would the male counterpart to 'feminist' be?
No, dont gimme those stereotyped-with-negative connotations terms like 'patriachical', or 'male-dominated' etc. please!


4 posted on 12/06/2005 8:43:51 AM PST by voletti ("A man's character is his fate." - Heraclitus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xsysmgr

The current system of feminizing boys, calling any boys with energy ADD and other forms of political correctness is leading to an age where boys are either wimps or thugs. There is no room left for the man who is strong and virtuous. Where is today's John Wayne, or even Jimmy Stewart. They are viewed as relics of a bygone era. So we are left with cultural icons who have dodged murder charges (P Diddy and Snoop Dog) or "sensitive" men.


5 posted on 12/06/2005 8:46:38 AM PST by Honestfreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: voletti

Ignore the boys and then when they act like boys, put them on Ritalin. Do you know what they used for chemical castration before the development of Dupro-prevera? Guess.


6 posted on 12/06/2005 8:47:05 AM PST by massgopguy (massgopguy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kjenerette

...read please.


7 posted on 12/06/2005 8:47:14 AM PST by Van Jenerette (Our Republic...If We Can Keep It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xsysmgr

Maybe Al Bundy was right... No MA'AM

National Organization Against Amazonian Masterhood


8 posted on 12/06/2005 8:47:22 AM PST by NYleatherneck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xsysmgr
For ages, Catholic schools operated with segregated sexes. There was a good reason for it.
9 posted on 12/06/2005 8:54:11 AM PST by Carry_Okie (There are people in power who are REALLY stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: voletti

Masculinests Unite!


10 posted on 12/06/2005 9:04:36 AM PST by Prokopton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Honestfreedom
"Where is today's John Wayne, or even Jimmy Stewart."

Well, I'd say we have plenty of good examples to choose from. The problem is getting them some "face" time for boys to see.

Might I suggest this as a good starting place for a fine example to ALL young men in this country of a "real" man:


11 posted on 12/06/2005 9:05:08 AM PST by Littlejon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: xsysmgr

Much of the gender difference is in the black community where many more women than men go to college.

There are definitely some situations where women have extra rights and this is bad. We should have equal rights for all citizens. but honestly it is still better to be male in this world both in the U.S. and around the world since there are intangible advantages for being male at every level of society.

Frankly, it is more advantageous to be white in spite of all the legal advantages for being black.

Interesting though how many really successful people from both groups do not favor affirmative action...


12 posted on 12/06/2005 9:08:58 AM PST by gondramB ( We don't get no government loan and no one sends a check from home-we just do what what we wanna)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massgopguy

"Ignore the boys and then when they act like boys, put them on Ritalin. Do you know what they used for chemical castration before the development of Dupro-prevera? Guess."


Are you saying they used to use Ritalin for chemical castration?

Ritalin is like most other prescription drugs - it has side effects and can do more harm than good if it is wrongly prescribed. But when Ritalin is prescribed for someone who does have ADHD the improvement is worth it.


13 posted on 12/06/2005 9:17:08 AM PST by gondramB ( We don't get no government loan and no one sends a check from home-we just do what what we wanna)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: xsysmgr
men make up only 43 percent of college students.

The number of science and technology fields probably remains relatively constant.

The numbers of sociological, educational, "studies", and bullsh*t majors however have exponentially exploded. Perhaps the actual raw numbers are the same but in relation to the total number of majors to choose from it seems less.

14 posted on 12/06/2005 9:22:02 AM PST by Lizavetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: voletti
Er, what would the male counterpart to 'feminist' be?

How about "Manly-man"?

15 posted on 12/06/2005 9:22:44 AM PST by EricT. (Caiaphas acted just like a modern Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: voletti

"Er, what would the male counterpart to 'feminist' be?"


If you go back far enough, feminism used to be the doctrine of equality between the genders.

These days I would settle for that.


16 posted on 12/06/2005 9:32:36 AM PST by gondramB ( We don't get no government loan and no one sends a check from home-we just do what what we wanna)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: gondramB

According to the New England Journal of Medicine. Yes!


17 posted on 12/06/2005 9:35:48 AM PST by massgopguy (massgopguy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Honestfreedom

Mel Gibson?
Bruce Willis?
Tom Selleck?


18 posted on 12/06/2005 9:36:54 AM PST by Little Ray (I'm a reactionary, hirsute, gun-owning, knuckle dragging, Christian Neanderthal and proud of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: massgopguy

"According to the New England Journal of Medicine. Yes!"


Very interesting... I have not heard about Ritalin being used for chemical castration. I taught high school for a few years and wound up running a department. I did not notice any correlation between kids on Ritalin and lack of interest with the opposite sex. I wonder if the dose was very high?


19 posted on 12/06/2005 9:40:20 AM PST by gondramB ( We don't get no government loan and no one sends a check from home-we just do what what we wanna)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Littlejon
don't forget Cigar Man...

20 posted on 12/06/2005 9:52:00 AM PST by Chode (American Hedonist ©®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson