Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

UK: Girl Sent Home from School for Wearing a Crucifix
Drudge Report ^ | December 5, 2005 | Matt Drudge

Posted on 12/05/2005 4:56:28 PM PST by West Coast Conservative

A school today defended its decision to exclude a pupil after she refused to take off her crucifix necklace.

Sam Morris, 16, was told to remove her cross and chain on Thursday by deputy head teacher Howard Jones at Sinfin Community School in Derby.

When the year-11 student refused she was told not to return until today and without the item of jewellery.

The 1,070-student comprehensive has a strict policy which bans most jewellery being worn.

Items can be worn out of view or if they are part of religious beliefs, such as the Kara, a bracelet worn by Sikh males.

But the policy has been described as "unfair" by Sam's mother, Debra Saunders.

Sinfin Community School deputy head teacher Howard Jones said her daughter's one-day exclusion had been a "last resort" after a 30-minute conversation failed to persuade her to take it off.

He said: "There was a long period of persuasion with her and she was given time. It was only at the end of that that I reluctantly had to exclude her for a day.

"I met with her mother today and readmitted her daughter."

Mr Jones said the strict jewellery policy, which bans large earrings or items worn on the outside of clothing - was to avoid accidents and to remove temptation from thieves.

However, Sikh male pupils are allowed to wear the Kara, one of five physical symbols worn by followers of the faith.

Mr Jones said: "As a Christian I don't have to wear a crucifix but Sikhs don't have that option and we have to be understanding. We live in a multi-faith society."

Mrs Saunders, of Thackeray Street, Sinfin, told the Derby Evening Telegraph: "Sam has worn this necklace for more than three years and it is of great sentimental value to her.

"No-one has told her to take it off before and she doesn't want to.

"She thinks it is very unfair when other people are allowed to wear religious symbols and it just ends up creating a divide between the pupils when everyone is told they should be living in unity."

Developing...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Philosophy; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: britain; christianity; cross; religion; school; sikhism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

1 posted on 12/05/2005 4:56:30 PM PST by West Coast Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

I just gotta shake my head in disbelief at the PC overload that's taking place. Anyone can wear anything they want unless he/she is a christian, then everything is out of bounds..


2 posted on 12/05/2005 5:01:50 PM PST by GeorgiaDawg32 (Islam is a religion of peace and they'll behead 13 year old girls to prove it...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative
Let's see,...she's suspended from school for wearing a necklace with the Crucifix on it, but,....items can be worn out of view or if they are part of religious beliefs.

I think the school master just messed up big time. I hope her family gets a good Barrister and hauls the Head Master into Court to embarrass the daylights out of him!
3 posted on 12/05/2005 5:01:55 PM PST by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

And why do they wear those braclets? What would happen if they took them off?


4 posted on 12/05/2005 5:02:06 PM PST by CindyDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative
The 1,070-student comprehensive has a strict policy which bans most jewellery being worn.

Misleading headline -- BTTT

5 posted on 12/05/2005 5:02:44 PM PST by Michael.SF. (Paris Hilton - Living proof that one need not be poor to be White Trash)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: West Coast Conservative

I don't think this is a minor matter, I think it's an outrage. And a clear case of discrimination against someone with Christian beliefs.


7 posted on 12/05/2005 5:05:51 PM PST by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative
We live in a multi-faith society

And it appears some are more equal than others.

8 posted on 12/05/2005 5:06:15 PM PST by Fzob (Why does this tag line keep showing up?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative
However, Sikh male pupils are allowed to wear the Kara, one of five physical symbols worn by followers of the faith.

Pure discrimination - against Christian females.

9 posted on 12/05/2005 5:12:46 PM PST by MamaDearest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

Well, it sure as heck shouldn't be a multi-faith society. Britain has been and should always remain a Christian nation populated by British. These Asians have plenty of land of their own - why can't they stay there? Why does the world feel the need to move to such a small place...known as Europe? I know why, of course, but they shouldn't be allowed to.


10 posted on 12/05/2005 5:13:45 PM PST by LEPEN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeorgiaDawg32

This article is worthless - it doesn't give enough information about the school policy to form an opinion. If the school policy literally says that students may wear jewelry items "if they are part of religious beliefs," then yes, a crucifix meets that standard. But we don't know the wording of the policy. What if it only allows items specifically mandated by one's religion? The crucifix doesn't meet this standard. All in all, this article is just flamebait to rile up the people, but contains no real information.


11 posted on 12/05/2005 5:16:54 PM PST by billybudd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative
He said: "There was a long period of persuasion with her and she was given time. It was only at the end of that that I reluctantly had to exclude her for a day.

She was excluded for one day from school, his excusion someday may be for a much longer time.

12 posted on 12/05/2005 5:19:16 PM PST by mware (That's Christmas with a C, not an X)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative
There was an incident in a No. Virginia school a few years back where a Jewish kid was told he couldn't wear a Star of David necklace. School said it could be a "gang symbol."

It's amazing to watch the anti-religion crowd spin their excuses.

13 posted on 12/05/2005 5:20:31 PM PST by lizma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

Outrageous! And I am a non-religious person.


14 posted on 12/05/2005 5:25:15 PM PST by agooga (Let Turkey Go!!! Turkey Doesn't Deserve To Die!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

I was in a spelling bee once in the 4th grade the word that got me was Jewelry.


15 posted on 12/05/2005 5:26:14 PM PST by sgtbono2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billybudd
But we don't know the wording of the policy.
    Do you mean this policy ?
  1. Anyone may wear a piece of jewelry as required for their religion except Jews and Christians.
  2. Do not take the Jews and Christians for friends.
  3. And kill them wherever you find them, and drive them out from whence they drove you out, and persecution is severer than slaughter,...

16 posted on 12/05/2005 5:26:49 PM PST by af_vet_1981
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

If these students are really Sikh, then besides the Kara, they are taking their Kirpans to school. They are not allowed to be without the "5 Ks".

So these guys carry swords to school, correct?

(the Kirpan is a sword)


17 posted on 12/05/2005 5:29:14 PM PST by Dont_Tread_On_Me_888 (Bush's #1 priority Africa. #2 priority appease Fox and Mexico . . . USA priority #64.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CindyDawg

Perhaps they're magic bracelets that deflect bullets, just like the ones Wonder Woman wears.

;)


18 posted on 12/05/2005 5:34:03 PM PST by mucrospirifer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative
However, Sikh male pupils are allowed to wear the Kara, one of five physical symbols worn by followers of the faith.

Sexual and religious discrimination! Cha-ching for the lawyers!

19 posted on 12/05/2005 5:34:48 PM PST by DTogo (Merry CHRISTmas, and a healthy & happy New Year!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_1981

I'm sure you meant something by this nonsensical post, but I just don't get it.


20 posted on 12/05/2005 5:37:07 PM PST by billybudd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson