Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Army report: Israel can't stop Iran nukes
World Tribune ^ | December 5, 2005

Posted on 12/05/2005 11:16:49 AM PST by West Coast Conservative

Geopolitical limitations render Israel's air force militarily incapable of halting Iran's nuclear weapons program according to a new report published the by U.S. Army War College.

The report asserts Israel lacks the military capability to locate and destroy Iranian nuclear assets. The report said the Israel Air Force cannot operate at such long distances from its bases.

"The Israeli Air Force has formidable capabilities and enjoys unchallenged supremacy vis-à-vis the other Middle East air powers, but Israel has no aircraft carriers and it cannot use airbases in other Middle East states," the report entitled "Getting Ready for a Nuclear-Ready Iran," said. "Therefore its operational capabilities are reduced when the targets are located far from its territory." [On Sunday, Israeli Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Dan Halutz warned that diplomatic pressure would not stop Iran's nuclear weapons program, Middle East Newsline reported. Halutz was one of three senior Israeli officials who warned that Iran would soon be able to turn into a nuclear power.]

In an article authored by Shlomo Brom, former head of air force strategic planning, the report said Israel's deep-strike air capability was based on the F-15I and F-16C/D aircraft. At a range of more than 600 kilometers, Brom said, Israel could not sustain an air campaign. Iran is about 1,000 kilometers from Israel.

"It is possible to determine that at long ranges — more then 600 kilometers — the IAF is capable of a few surgical strikes, but it is not capable of a sustained air campaign against a full array of targets," the report said.

An Israeli air attack on Iran must also include such support aircraft as air refueling, electronic countermeasures, support, communication, and rescue, the report said. The mission would also require precision intelligence.

Brom said Israel's intelligence and military community was divided over the Iranian threat. He said military intelligence regards Iran as determined to destroy Israel. The Mossad and National Security Council see Teheran as preoccupied with national defense and regime survival.

"While the first school assumes no political pressure can force Iran to stop its military nuclear program, the other school believes that political pressure can be effective in at least delaying the nuclear program significantly," the report said. "The second school believes that a nuclear Iran with a different regime will not pose a high risk to Israel and can be easily deterred."

The report said the Bushehr nuclear power plant was vulnerable to attacks but does not constitute a key element of the military nuclear program. As a result, the destruction of Bushehr would not have a significant effect on Iran's military program.

Brom said Iranian nuclear assets are located between 1,500 and 1,700 kilometers from Israel. The report expressed doubts whether such Israeli allies as India and Turkey would allow Israel to launch a military strike from their territory.

"This means that the Israeli attack aircraft would have to take off from air bases in Israel, fly 1,500-1,700 kilometers to the targets, destroy them, and then fly back 1,500-1,700 kilometers," the report said.

The Israel Air Force has 25 F-15I and 137 F-16C/D fighter-bombers. The air force has already received more than 20 F-16Is, with longer range on the F-15I, but the report said the F-15I aircraft contains greater capabilities at long ranges.

The report said the F-15I has an operational radius of 1,270 kilometers. The F-16I has an operational radius of 2,100 kilometers while that of the F-16C/D is 925 kilometers.

But the report said the real operational radius was shorter because the planes would have to fly at low altitude to avoid radar detection. Brom said the Israeli aircraft could avoid Iranian air defense but would be detected.

"In any case, any Israeli attack on an Iranian nuclear target would be a very complex operation in which a relatively large number of attack aircraft and support aircraft — interceptors, ECM [electronic counter-measures] aircraft, refuelers, and rescue aircraft — would participate," the report said. "The conclusion is that Israel could attack only a few Iranian targets and not as part of a sustainable operation over time, but as a one time surprise operation."


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Israel; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: army; axisofevil; conformaltanks; iaf; iran; irannukes; israel; nukes; tankers; warcollege
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-168 next last

1 posted on 12/05/2005 11:16:51 AM PST by West Coast Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

BS alert


2 posted on 12/05/2005 11:17:46 AM PST by boomop1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

25 F-15's? I thought it was more than that.

And yes, there is nothing for you to worry about Iran, go about your business.


3 posted on 12/05/2005 11:19:12 AM PST by Steelerfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative
So WHY don't OUR Armed Forces help out?

I mean, we've got F18s, F16s and even some F15s stationed in Iraq.

Can't we at least help our Israeli friends?

4 posted on 12/05/2005 11:19:24 AM PST by ExcursionGuy84 ("Jesus, Your Love takes my breath away.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: boomop1

I'm not sure sure that this is BS... to get to Iran, they have no safe route. Every country in their way is hostile to them.


5 posted on 12/05/2005 11:19:36 AM PST by oolatec
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

How'd they take out Iran's nuke stuff last time ?


6 posted on 12/05/2005 11:20:34 AM PST by stylin19a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stylin19a

That was Iraq's nuke stuff last time. Saddam's.


7 posted on 12/05/2005 11:21:39 AM PST by JillValentine (Western liberals who sympathize with terrorists are kissing the ass that farts on them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: boomop1

I don't agree that this is BS.

I believe it is an attempt to warm up to the idea of the U.S. bombing Iran.


8 posted on 12/05/2005 11:22:14 AM PST by i_dont_chat (Houston, TX)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JillValentine

oops...thanx


9 posted on 12/05/2005 11:22:34 AM PST by stylin19a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

Watch the Israelis make muttonheads out of the eggheads at the Army War College.


10 posted on 12/05/2005 11:23:20 AM PST by RexBeach ("The rest of the world is three drinks behind." -Humphrey Bogart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: boomop1

Sounds right on the money to me.

The Israeli raid on Entebbe faced the same problems. Kenya stepped up and allowed refueling.

The only Kenya is Iraq via Jordan.


11 posted on 12/05/2005 11:23:38 AM PST by bert (K.E. ; N.P . Franks in '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative
The report asserts Israel lacks the military capability to locate and destroy Iranian nuclear assets. The report said the Israel Air Force cannot operate at such long distances from its bases

Yea wanna bet?

My bet is on Israel

12 posted on 12/05/2005 11:23:59 AM PST by Mo1 (Message to Democrats .... We do not surrender and run from a fight !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stylin19a
"How'd they take out Iran's nuke stuff last time ?"

They didn't; you're thinking of the Iraqi light water reactor in Osiraq, which was bombed by Israel on June 7, 1981, after a previous attack by Iran on the reactor site failed.
13 posted on 12/05/2005 11:24:33 AM PST by NJ_gent (Modernman should not have been banned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

WANNA BET?


14 posted on 12/05/2005 11:24:37 AM PST by Lowell (The voice from beyond the edge!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IAF ThunderPilot

Ping!


15 posted on 12/05/2005 11:26:06 AM PST by Convert from ECUSA (It really, truly is a "religion of peace", and the jihadistinian rioters in France prove it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

who said anything about fighter planes? an icbm will do just nicely. and if you're not sure about targets, remove all doubt.


16 posted on 12/05/2005 11:27:01 AM PST by InsureAmerica (Evil? I have many words for it. We are as dust, to them. - v v putin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: boomop1

Where's the BS? Iran's program can't be conventionally destroyed. It's too spread out, too far underground. The only solution is a quick decapitation of the entire Iranian government, and not conventionally, either.

I think we have to read a bit between the lines re: Israel and Palestine. Israel obviously knew this was coming. I'm beginning to think Israel realizes it's going to need to score some points with their neighbors in Jordan and Egypt before they turn Tehran radioactive.

This is very very serious.


17 posted on 12/05/2005 11:27:21 AM PST by Rutles4Ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative
I would think that Mossad would smuggle in some Russian
suitcase nukes and make it look like an Iranian accident.
Damn those nukes are tricky to get right
or
Do the Gerald Bull/supergun on their scientists which proved that a well aimed 22 beats anything else - because it follows the laws of physics and it's available now.
Why do an airstrike, when you can get creative.
18 posted on 12/05/2005 11:27:48 AM PST by Waverunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

Nuclear submarines are a beautiful thing when you lack air space permissions...


19 posted on 12/05/2005 11:28:25 AM PST by Rutles4Ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: bert
The only Kenya is Iraq via Jordan.

This, I think, is the crux of the problem. If Iran were on Israel's border, this would have been done a long time ago. As it stands now, the US would have to provide some sort of support, and I don't know how deep this nation is willing to wade into those waters...
20 posted on 12/05/2005 11:28:58 AM PST by July 4th (A vacant lot cancelled out my vote for Bush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-168 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson