Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Big boost to battlefield operations [tank-based "shotgun" round!]
U.S. Army Public Affairs ^ | December 5, 2005 | Wakeland Kuamoo

Posted on 12/05/2005 11:02:45 AM PST by 68skylark

FORT KNOX, Ky. (Army News Service, Dec. 5, 2005) -- While the booming sounds of a 120mm tank main gun firing on Cedar Creek Range were familiar, the type of tank round being fired was very unique.

The 16th Cavalry Regiment provided a live fire demonstration of the first M1028 canister rounds at Fort Knox, Nov. 10. The canister round is the newest 120mm tank main gun ammunition now available to the Armor Force, and has been deployed in the Middle East.

According to Maj. Kevin Parker, the S-3 of the 16th Cav., the purpose of the demonstration was to provide trainers with the opportunity to see close up the unique capability of the canister round.

New round flexibility

While the canister round is not the heaviest tank main gun round in the inventory, its size and weight distribution does make handling and loading the round a bit unique.

Soldiers and Marines who have handled and fired the round in preparation for deployment to Iraq have said that with a bit of practice the round can be handled in much the same way as the other 120mm rounds in the inventory.

Fort Knox senior leaders, including Fort Knox Commander Maj. Gen. Robert Williams and post Deputy Commander Brig. Gen. Albert Bryant attended the demonstration.

“Since the inception of the 120mm-armed Abrams tank, we have lacked a true anti-personnel weapon system. The M1028 canister round has satisfied that need,” said Bryant. “A documented operational need for such a round has long existed in Korea. Operations in Somalia and now in Afghanistan and Iraq have demonstrated that the requirement also exists for stability operations.

“The M1028 canister round provides the tanker in the field with another option to defeat the enemy and protect our troops.”

Battlefield promise

“The canister round was awesome,” according to Staff Sgt. Michael Hill and Sgt. Daniel Miller, of Troop B, 1-16th Cav., who were part of the firing crew. They said the round would be great for tankers confronted by massed enemy troops, inflicting massive casualties and providing a shock effect which will certainly make other enemy troops think twice before continuing their attack.

“We know the canister round will be able to defeat enemy dismounted troops, no question,” said Williams. Based on this demonstration, it is clear that it can also defeat other obstacles, such as wall barriers, during the close in fight. The good news for the tanker is that while the enemy can still run, the canister round will make sure they can’t hide.”

(Editor’s note: This story was submitted by the Fort Knox Turret.)


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: apolitewhiff; canister; ofgrapeshot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101 next last
To: stumpy

I don't see us fighting North Korea with thousands of tubes within range of cities in South Korea.... but again, it is nice to have.


21 posted on 12/05/2005 11:15:06 AM PST by bnelson44 (Proud parent of a tanker!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: English Nationalist

Gunner, troops in the open, 75m, Beehive, fire at will...


22 posted on 12/05/2005 11:15:50 AM PST by Cvengr (<;^))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: xcamel

Oh my GOD!Is that the shell? That thing would turn a human into a sponge!


23 posted on 12/05/2005 11:17:25 AM PST by domenad (In all things, in all ways, at all times, let honor guide me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: English Nationalist
New? This was around in WW2.

Canister's been around since before the Civil War. Grapeshot longer than that.

It's an awesome anti-personnel weapon.

24 posted on 12/05/2005 11:17:57 AM PST by Kenton (The worst tragedy that ever befell Africa was the end of colonialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark

If my memory serves, we used a 105mm round in Vietnam called a Beehive round that was effectively used against wire breeches during the Tet Offensive.


25 posted on 12/05/2005 11:18:44 AM PST by Spok (Est omnis de civilitate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xcamel
Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center Twentynine Palms, Calif.(Sept. 19, 2005) -- As a 68-ton of steel, tracked M1A1 main battle tank rolls down a street, either patrolling or fighting in a highly threatening urban terrain, the crew must use their machine guns to take out insurgents on foot.

It’s either the mounted M2 .50 caliber heavy machine gun or the mounted and coaxial M240G medium machine gun that will pick off individual threats. The tank’s main gun can fire off a high explosive round toward a single small target but is one small target worth a round that can take out a building? A round that disperses like a shotgun blast is being used today on urban terrain. The brutal effects of the round were recently experienced in the Combat Center’s training area.

Third Platoon, Delta Company, 1st Tank Battalion, fired M1028 120 mm Canister Rounds Sept. 19 at Combat Center’s Range 500.

Similar to a shotgun round, Canister Rounds are cartridges made for the M1A1 main battle tanks, which are comprised of approximately 1,100 tungsten balls, three-eights of an inch in diameter, which are dispersed when fired from the main gun. The fuse-less rounds disperse the balls in a cone-like shape, increasing its impact area as the distance toward the target increases.

The anti-personnel round provides effective and lethal reaction against assaulting infantry who could be armed with hand-held anti-tank and automatic weapons.

Delta Company’s Third Platoon got a chance to experience the destruction the Canister Rounds can cause to a target.

“Third Platoon has already executed their gunnery qualification,” said Staff Sgt. Timothy L. Duvall, battalion master gunner.

“They are ready to set out with the 11th Marine Expeditionary Unit. Before they go I wanted to give the platoon a chance to test out the rounds. They have never seen the effects of them.”

Third Platoon lined up in their respective tanks at the firing line to blast off one canister round per crew. The targets were wooden silhouettes 100-meters-away, 200-meters-away and 300-meters away, spread out approximately 30 meters apart, laterally.

The rounds demolished the 100-meter target and left the 200- and 300-meter targets riddled with holes from the tungsten shower.

“It was like a powerful shotgun blast,” said Cpl. Windell Brackenridge, gunner, Delta Company, 1st Tank Battalion. “Anything in front of the tanks doesn’t stand a chance with these rounds.”,

26 posted on 12/05/2005 11:20:10 AM PST by Max in Utah (By their works you shall know them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: English Nationalist
This was around in WW2.

They were using canister and grape shot at least as far back as the Civil War.

27 posted on 12/05/2005 11:20:32 AM PST by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark

This weapon, in principle known to Napoleon, has been the topic of several threads over the past year.


28 posted on 12/05/2005 11:20:38 AM PST by RightWhale (Not transferable -- Good only for this trip)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: English Nationalist

"New? This was around in WW2."

This was around in the Revolutionary war when George Washington ordered the men to put their buttons and belt buckles into the cannons.

Heck, this was probably done with a catapult 3,000 years before that.


29 posted on 12/05/2005 11:21:58 AM PST by MeanWestTexan (Many at FR would respond to Christ "Darn right, I'll cast the first stone!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark
It's basically a 60s style "beehive" round for the 120 main gun there's nothing new about the design just the caliber.Now if they'll bring back the 40mm shot shell for the M203 we'll be in business.
30 posted on 12/05/2005 11:22:42 AM PST by edchambers (Neocon foot-soldier of the Haliburton death squad)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kenton; IronJack

I was talking specifically about canister as a type of tank shell


31 posted on 12/05/2005 11:22:46 AM PST by English Nationalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: ExcursionGuy84

You're right. Back in the later 70s when I was at Fort Knox, our M-60 tanks had four standard combat rounds. Sabot, HEAT, HEP, and Beehive. The Beehive could be set to open at various distances and the flechettes would begin their spread pattern.

But since the M-1 uses the 120mm, only two combat rounds were available: HEAT (High Explosive Anti-Tank) and Sabot (depleted uranium penetrator--armor piercing discarding sabot). Only the coax and other machineguns were truly anti-personnel. I'm not surprised that they have again added this type of main gun munition.


32 posted on 12/05/2005 11:25:38 AM PST by Monterrosa-24 (France kicked Germany's teeth out at Verdun among other places.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark

This gives new meaning to the term "crowd control"


33 posted on 12/05/2005 11:26:31 AM PST by BadAndy (Note to Democrats: Benedict Arnold also called himself a patriot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Monterrosa-24

What was main gun on the M60's? 105mm's??


34 posted on 12/05/2005 11:27:47 AM PST by ExcursionGuy84 ("Jesus, Your Love takes my breath away.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark

"Give 'em a whiff of the grape!"


35 posted on 12/05/2005 11:28:39 AM PST by Cyber Liberty (© 2005, Ravin' Lunatic since 4/98)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the 9
I can't imagine why it was never provided for the 120mm.

That's easy...the M1 Tank was conceived first and last as a killer of other tanks (unlike earlier US tanks). That is why they gave it the gas turbine engine, the night vision systems, stabilized gun, and eventually that 120-mm Rheinmetal smoothbore.

36 posted on 12/05/2005 11:29:29 AM PST by Tallguy (When it's a bet between reality and delusion, bet on reality -- Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Spok
Yeah, I've been in the field artillery and you're correct about the "beehive" being used in Vietnam for 105mm howitzers. The round has now been taken out of the inventory for field artillery -- I'm not sure that's a smart move, but I'm sure it could always be brought back if we need it.

On a related topic, there never was on official "beehive" round for 155mm or 8-inch howitzers. But at Ft. Sill we were taught that a canvas bag of roofing nails would work well -- I think they recommended 40-60 pounds of nails for a 155. Can you imagine that!?

37 posted on 12/05/2005 11:29:50 AM PST by 68skylark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Max in Utah

Why tungsten? Weren't Claymore ball-bearings steel?
I seem to recall the Germans had a good anti-tank gun that
fired a sabot-tungsten round, but that was to pierce metal.


38 posted on 12/05/2005 11:33:06 AM PST by OkieDoke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: ExcursionGuy84

Right it was a 105mm which was still relatively new as some NCO preferred the 90mm because it had a completely mechanical firing pin vs the 105's electric charge in its firing pin.

The article explains this new round is simpler than the beehive and is only for relatively close ranges like the similar round the Sheridan tanks had. But the Sheridan's 152mm stubby big bore used flechettes instead of shot.


39 posted on 12/05/2005 11:33:55 AM PST by Monterrosa-24 (France kicked Germany's teeth out at Verdun among other places.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: English Nationalist

Stuarts used them on Guadalcanal


40 posted on 12/05/2005 11:34:00 AM PST by wildcatf4f3 (admittedly too unstable for public office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson