Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Can you hear me now, Kim?
1 posted on 12/04/2005 12:02:04 PM PST by Excuse_My_Bellicosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity

....buh bye Iran!!!!


2 posted on 12/04/2005 12:06:38 PM PST by SweetCaroline ("You cannot help the poor by destroying the rich...Abraham Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
He won't be ronery if he's dead.


3 posted on 12/04/2005 12:07:25 PM PST by doug from upland (The troops will come home when the mission is complete)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity

Well, with our ICBM's, SLBMs, and the B-2s and B-1s, this was a foregone conclusion.


4 posted on 12/04/2005 12:09:43 PM PST by Jeff Head (www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity

Any details as to how quickly the various types of lightning strikes could be? Say, like 15-30 minutes max to any one location? If I were a middle eastern (or south asian) Islamofascist, I wouldn't be able to sleep at night knowing U.S. submarines lying dormant in the Indian Ocean or South China Sea could launch several dozen nuclear tipped missiles anywhere in my direction, in a matter of minutes. A nightmare scenario, indeed. How pleasant.


6 posted on 12/04/2005 12:17:33 PM PST by john drake (roman military maxim: "oderint dum metuant, i.e., let them hate, as long as they fear")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity

So, whats new? We had global strike capabilities 40 years ago! Re-stating the obvious, in case they weren't paying attention, probably.


7 posted on 12/04/2005 12:23:08 PM PST by Don Carlos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity

Sounds like the good old days of the fifties and the ICBM.


11 posted on 12/04/2005 12:33:42 PM PST by RightWhale (Not transferable -- Good only for this trip)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity

You mean our military forces are....[gulp]....capable?!?


13 posted on 12/04/2005 12:38:36 PM PST by StatenIsland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity

What kind of nonsense is this????

Anyone hear of the Trident Submarine fleet being decommissioned?

I have not!


14 posted on 12/04/2005 1:08:04 PM PST by Prost1 (I get my news at Free Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
Back when I was a SAC crewdog, it was almost impossible to get transferred out of the command. What was worse, if you did get a non-SAC assignment, SAC had first refusal on you next time around. We called it "SAC's world-wide striking power."
16 posted on 12/04/2005 1:14:17 PM PST by Grut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity

hmmmm


19 posted on 12/04/2005 2:16:55 PM PST by shield (The Greatest Scientific Discoveries of the Century Reveal God!!!! by Dr. H. Ross, Astrophysicist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity

Excellent news. We need to keep our nuclear response razor sharp.


20 posted on 12/04/2005 2:32:18 PM PST by MARKUSPRIME
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity

I think this was intended for Iran!


21 posted on 12/04/2005 2:34:11 PM PST by eastforker (Under Cover FReeper going dark(too much 24))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
As a former USAF veteran and formerly assigned to SAC, Strategic Air Command it seems to me that the military is just reinventing the wheel. The USAF had a global strike capability years ago and that was in the hands of SAC until it was deactivated in 1992. The only thing different now is certain weapon systems. The ability to strike was already there.
22 posted on 12/04/2005 2:42:27 PM PST by puppypusher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity; GOP_1900AD
Can you hear me now, Kim?

A strategic deterrent is only as credible as the guy who is supposed to pull the trigger. W has obviously been found wanting in credibility when it comes to the nuclear issue.

Obviously they don't. And have no reason to worry. W's continued kid-glove treatment of Pakistan, Iran, North Korea, not to mention China.

His pell-mell unilateral U.S. nuclear disarmament in the Moscow Treaty...hoping Russia would follow suit, and going ahead despite Moscow later blatantly announcing it would NOT dismantle any SS-18s until 2017 made clear he is subscribing to the distinctly liberal doctrinaire arms control posture.... Known as "Wishful Thinking."

A lame posture which merely evokes open contempt and scorn by the tyrants.

North Korea's missile test in W's face proved it. Iran's brinksmanship with Israel proves it.

They all believe he is either checkmated...or spine-challenged.

24 posted on 08/07/2006 11:33:34 AM PDT by Paul Ross (We cannot be for lawful ordinances and for an alien conspiracy at one and the same moment.-Cicero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity

What is new? Seems like the Polaris system had that capability. Not to mention the B-52s that were constantly flying around the clock, the first jet contrails some of us ever saw.


25 posted on 08/07/2006 11:38:13 AM PDT by RightWhale (Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
Here is the sentence I find interesting/like.

..wrote that the classified exercise involved the response to a radiological “dirty bomb” attack on Alabama by the fictional country Purple or allied terrorists.

26 posted on 08/07/2006 11:52:18 AM PDT by Vinnie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson