The only thing that has been stopped is they have made slight changes to the Crescent, removed the name "Crescent of Embrace," and are now calling it a bowl. The rest of the entire memorial continues to exist as a shrine to the terrorists. The architect is a liberal who believes that terrorists can be won over and that "inclusion" is the way to bring peace to the world. I have proof of his intent from a letter I received from one of his relations. The entire design includes Islamic symbolism and there is not a single cross or flag to be found on the site. The media is lying about this being "stopped."
Typical of the media is this article: http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory?id=1358444
The truth about this new design (linked in my original message): http://errortheory.blogspot.com/2005/11/redesigned-flight-93-memorial-still_30.html
Michelle Malkin and several others came out stongly against the original design.
Have they taken a position on this new design? It has been available online for about a week.
What is it with these architects?
Why in the EFF don't they hire a new firm?
You really have to watch some architects....particularly landscape....the latter are almost always greenie lefties.
Damn shame....I loathe folks like this.