Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Princeton Bioethicist says only “Know-Nothing Religious Fundamentalists” will Value Human Life by 20
LifeSite ^ | Friday December 2, 2005 | Hilary White

Posted on 12/02/2005 6:21:53 PM PST by nickcarraway

PRINCETON, December 2, 2005 (LifeSiteNews.com) - Infamous advocate of infanticide and the man often credited as the founder of the modern radical animal rights movement, Dr. Peter Singer, was featured in the National Post this week predicting that the traditional ethics of western civilization would shortly be abolished. Singer’s comments appeared first in the September/October edition of the journal Foreign Policy as a speculation on what cherished social institutions would still exist in 35 years.

Singer, a strict utilitarian and the man the New York Times called the “greatest living philosopher,” says, “By 2040, it may be that only a rump of hard-core, know-nothing religious fundamentalists will defend the view that every human life, from conception to death, is sacrosanct.”

The title, “The Sanctity of Life,” can only be meant as ironic coming from a man who has made his fame advocating abortion through all nine months of pregnancy, infanticide up to thirty days after birth and euthanasia for the elderly and infirm.

Singer’s predictions, shocking as they may appear, are well on the way to fruition, however. With the advance of utilitarian philosophy at both ends of human life, first with abortion, then with cloning, IVF, and growing rates of infanticide, and then with the acceptance of euthanasia, Singer has merely given an approving nod to what is verifiably happening all over the world.

He predicts bluntly, “During the next 35 years, the traditional view of the sanctity of human life will collapse under pressure from scientific, technological, and demographic developments.”

What Singer refuses to acknowledge is that there is no unavoidable necessity for this collapse. In fact most of it is being forced on nations by activist judges, undemocratic government and other organization actions and ruthless elites, who have constantly distorted facts to suit their agendas.

Technology has been developing since the emergence of organized human culture. In all that time, however, it is not until our own epoch that the suicidal anti-human philosophy has been so broadly accepted. In no other time before the modern age, has it been seriously proposed that the development of technology must necessarily supercede the inherent value of human life.

Ironically, as the implementation of Singer’s philosophical imperatives of drastic population reduction, mass euthanasia programmes, abortion and infanticide advance, the logical outcome will be that only those “know-nothing religious fundamentalists” he excoriates will survive the anti-human pogroms.

Read the full article: http://www.utilitarian.net/singer/by/200509--.htm


TOPICS: Extended News
KEYWORDS: 2040; abortion; bioethics; deathcult; euthanasia; humanlife; infanticide; petersinger; population; princeton; religion; singer; trends; utilitarianism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 next last
To: StPatricksBreastplate

I believe that God always has a witness even in the darkest places so that men are without excuse. I should think to pray for men and women in these tough places; they must feel like Daniel.


41 posted on 12/02/2005 7:40:05 PM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: IrishRainy

Funny how all their rules apply to everyone but themselves.


42 posted on 12/02/2005 7:40:56 PM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

"Utilitarian" is a Swiss army knife. Used as it is in this article, it should be replaced with "fool"


43 posted on 12/02/2005 7:44:41 PM PST by Imnotalib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SteveMcKing
I am a 'utilitarian', but in the very spirit of the word, I am willing to discard the term and adopt a new label if that's what's required

Lol..."The greatest happiness for the greatest number" is Utilitarian. Mussolini, Stalin, and Mao were Utilitarians.
.
44 posted on 12/02/2005 7:46:20 PM PST by mugs99 (Don't take life too seriously, you won't get out alive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: StPatricksBreastplate

I'll match your Robert George with a Nicholas Wolterstorff. Despite its current apostasy it is founded on True Religon.


45 posted on 12/02/2005 7:53:53 PM PST by Johannes Althusius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: metmom

Really overpriced toilet paper. Princeton is a private university.


46 posted on 12/02/2005 7:54:38 PM PST by Fred Hayek (Liberalism is a mental disorder)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: WKB; All
Revelation 21:8 "But the cowardly, unbelieving, abominable, murderers, sexually immoral, sorcerers, idolaters, and all liars shall have their part in the lake which burns with fire and brimstone, which is the second death." (NKJV)
SOLI DEO GLORIA!

47 posted on 12/02/2005 8:00:48 PM PST by alpha-8-25-02 ("SAVED BY GRACE AND GRACE ALONE")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: alpha-8-25-02

AND?


48 posted on 12/02/2005 8:02:19 PM PST by WKB (If you can't dazzle them with brilliance.. then Baffle them with BS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: mugs99
"The greatest happiness for the greatest number" is Utilitarian. Mussolini, Stalin, and Mao were Utilitarians.

Absurd... happiness is abstract, its measurement is more meaningless, and the "greatest number" can all bite me.

In the interest of avoiding confusion, I shall not speak the U-word from now on.

49 posted on 12/02/2005 8:07:16 PM PST by SteveMcKing ("No empire collapses because of technical reasons. They collapse because they are unnatural.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Rastus
I keep pointing out that according to many on this forum, we are without design or purpose. So, how much can one accident of time and chance complain when the other accidents decide to snuff him or her out for convenience or fun? Ole Pete is just pointing out the inevitable fruits of Darwinism and post-modernism. I don't agree with him. At least give him credit because he hasn't buried his head in the sand like those that want a moral society but without God. He is just pointing out the logical conclusion to current prevailing philosophy and most don't like it...yet.
50 posted on 12/02/2005 8:12:15 PM PST by chickenlips
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: WKB; alpha-8-25-02

AND?... If you think that living thru the first death is finality then you will really find out in the second death that there is no finality to your death.


51 posted on 12/02/2005 8:13:38 PM PST by Johannes Althusius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Johannes Althusius

AND?... If you think that living thru the first death is finality then you will really find out in the second death that there is no finality to your death.


I knew that!!


52 posted on 12/02/2005 8:14:59 PM PST by WKB (If you can't dazzle them with brilliance.. then Baffle them with BS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
I altered the title- only because the full title would not fit in its full form.

That's OK, Singer's ego can't be fit into an expanding super nova, let alone his cranium. At least the title you've presented is better comprehended than his dribble. Good read.

53 posted on 12/02/2005 8:20:44 PM PST by Cvengr (<;^))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Singer is what evil looks like.


54 posted on 12/02/2005 8:28:27 PM PST by MarMema (http://www.curenikolette.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
“By 2040, it may be that only a rump of hard-core, know-nothing religious fundamentalists will defend the view that every human life, from conception to death, is sacrosanct.”

Read between the lines, everybody - the Leftists are gearing up for another Stalinist purge.

55 posted on 12/02/2005 8:56:08 PM PST by JoJo Gunn (Help control the Leftist population. Have them spayed or neutered. ©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SIDENET
Unlike Nietzche, this alleged human hasn't even had the personal grace to go clinically mad and die young.

As if this clown will even be alive in 2040, eh? Any stupid sod can make a prediction whose outcome he or she will not live to see...sheesh.

56 posted on 12/02/2005 8:57:48 PM PST by SAJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Many before him have predicted the demise of Christianity and the Judeo-Christian ethic. They are gone, and Christianity continues to thrive - despite the assaults!


57 posted on 12/02/2005 9:19:24 PM PST by LiteKeeper (Beware the secularization of America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WinOne4TheGipper
the logical outcome will be that only those “know-nothing religious fundamentalists” he excoriates will survive the anti-human pogroms.
---
No, since they will refuse to bow to the "utilitarian" ideal of human life, they will themselves be among the first targets of the anti-human pogroms.
If this nutburger's ideas are actually put in place, no human in the country or on the planet will be safe from arbitrary extermination.
The insane and brutal massacres of Hitler, Stalin, Mao and the other collectivist butchers of the last century will be repeated in this century. And nutburger here approves.
58 posted on 12/03/2005 2:40:35 AM PST by Cheburashka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Rastus
I called him a nutburger, but you are right. His idea certainly are monstrous.
59 posted on 12/03/2005 2:42:57 AM PST by Cheburashka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Singer, Sanger, grim reapers, grim rapers of life.


60 posted on 12/03/2005 2:46:15 AM PST by stocksthatgoup (Polls = Proof that when the MSM want your opinion it will give it to you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson