To: churchillbuff
Newmark now suffers from a moral dilemma: He feels guilty about helping cause job losses and poorer-quality papers, but he's excited to accelerate the decline of the big, bad mainstream media.""
To: churchillbuff
Bay Area papers alone forfeit at least $50 million annually to Craigslist, losses that contribute to layoffs of dozens of reporters. As fearful publishers cut newsroom jobs, inferior news coverage is the likely outcome. BUAHAHAHAHAHA. This guy has a very overblown sense of self -- news reporting CAN'T get any worse.
"Journalists" today are hacks -- they can't use proper grammar, they invent news, they slant their stories (to the Left).
This is complaining about quill pens bein replaced by ballpoints!
3 posted on
12/01/2005 4:29:21 PM PST by
freedumb2003
(Vote Democrat--it's Easier than Getting a Job.)
To: churchillbuff
Now that I have had a chance to read the rest of the article, I have to say it is a perfect example of why newspapers are loosing advertising dollars.
Talk about purple prose! My gawd, you would think William Rivers Pitt or some 10th grader wrote this.
4 posted on
12/01/2005 4:31:28 PM PST by
freedumb2003
(Vote Democrat--it's Easier than Getting a Job.)
To: churchillbuff
Do I detect a whiff of self-righteous carping here from some Jurassic reporter types...nah, couldn't be. These are
Bay Area reporters, the Progressive of the Progressives.
Why, they could never be against something new and more democratic then the Commie rags they all write fiction for....nooooo, not them, huh-uh, they're the Vanguard of the New Reality....at least they thought they were, until it kinda left their butts in the dust.
5 posted on
12/01/2005 4:31:41 PM PST by
Regulator
To: churchillbuff
6 posted on
12/01/2005 4:32:37 PM PST by
rcocean
(Copyright is theft and loved by Hollywood socialists)
To: churchillbuff
Interesting that the article doesn't mention that ebay has purchased a stake of Craig's List (I forget the percentage).
I guess that's because we're stuck with having inadeuqate reporters.
I love Craig's List.
7 posted on
12/01/2005 4:40:14 PM PST by
birbear
(Admit it. you clicked on the "I have already previewed" button without actually previewing the post.)
To: churchillbuff
I suppose if people stopped housebreaking their puppies, there would be an even more significant drop in the demand for newspapers.
8 posted on
12/01/2005 4:45:36 PM PST by
weegee
(Christmas - the holiday that dare not speak its name.)
To: churchillbuff
The San Jose Mercury News alone misses out on $12 million annually in employment ad revenue because of Craigslist, according to recent estimates by Lou Alexander, who retired as the paper's advertising operations director two years ago. Of course it wouldn't be because of Monster.com or other webservices...
Of course losses in ad revenue wouldn't have anything to do with being caught publishing inflated circulation figures either (a nationwide scam).
9 posted on
12/01/2005 4:50:03 PM PST by
weegee
(Christmas - the holiday that dare not speak its name.)
To: churchillbuff
I wonder how many of the newspapers who decry the freeness and/or cheapness of Craigslist have written editorials extolling the benefits of illegal immigration and how its wage-suppressing effects result in so-called cheaper products.
I suppose Craig Newmark is just doing a job American newspapers just won't do.
To: churchillbuff
he's excited to accelerate the decline of the big, bad mainstream media.
---
burn baby burn!
12 posted on
12/01/2005 4:59:44 PM PST by
traviskicks
(http://www.neoperspectives.com/french_riots.htm)
To: churchillbuff
The San Jose Mercury News alone misses out on $12 million annually in employment ad revenue because of Craigslist Maybe Barbara Boxer can claim it's the paper's constitutional right to get the money. Only the left can think the above makes sense. The sense of entitlement, that is. Liberals whining is such a great read!! I love good news.
14 posted on
12/01/2005 5:00:48 PM PST by
bfree
(Tolerance kills)
To: churchillbuff
First the story about the Chicago Tribune laying off people. Now this. Two good news stories in one day!!!
16 posted on
12/01/2005 5:09:06 PM PST by
abb
(Because News Reporting is too important to be left to the Journalists.)
To: churchillbuff
but given the reliance of participatory government on newspapers, it may be no bargain at all for society I understand the author's meaning totally: that government should STOP RELYING ON NEWSPAPERS at the earliest possible time.
I approve.
17 posted on
12/01/2005 5:21:45 PM PST by
gaijin
To: churchillbuff
Fewer reporters often means lower-grade news coverage... "There may be as many stories, but fewer have depth and include investigation." How much depth and investigation does it take to change a few words in the Democrat talking points before they publish it?
18 posted on
12/01/2005 5:36:23 PM PST by
RJL
To: churchillbuff
With the free ads, I don't understand how craigslist generates income. Have I missed something obvious?
21 posted on
12/02/2005 12:43:15 AM PST by
TwilightDog
(("The world is a stage, but the play is badly cast"--Oscar Wilde))
To: churchillbuff
At one point last year the Marin IJ offered all motor dealers a deal of 15 adds, a day, 7 days a week, for $300 a month, after 2 months they were filling 4 pages of adds a day.
Then for some corporate reason they stopped, I assume it was taking advertisers from there other newspapers, now they are back to the normal 1 page maybe.
I do not cry for the newspapers, they were ripping off advertisers for years, now it has stopped.
GOOD.
24 posted on
11/22/2006 1:28:00 AM PST by
petestuff
(Bad management should not be rewarded)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson