Posted on 12/01/2005 2:52:44 PM PST by new yorker 77
Tom Tancredo helped a lot but many applied pressure to change this memorial to the better.
Of course Tom is great on illegal immigration and was great when he had the guts to say Mecca Medina should be on considered for nuclear retaliation should an Islamic nuke be detonated here.
Where is Tancredo claiming credit for the redesign?
Source please.
Did YOU support the original design?
He is also not "stonewalling" immigration reform. He is trying to get immigration to serve the interests of the American people, not Mexico or big corporate interests.
You can tell a lot about a person by their choice of enemies. It is interesting that you heartily dislike someone who is willing to stand up to the open borders crowd.
I agree. Evidently it still points to Mecca, and is a natural guage of when to pray if your a Muslem adherent. What the hell was this designer thinking.
Evidently he counted the terrorists in the body count to be memorialized too.
Tar and feathers come to mind...
ping!
Please FReepmail me if you want on or off my ‘miscellaneous’ ping list.
Thanks for that. We live in PA and wanted to visit it when it was finished. I will write them.
Kinda like the po'ed dad when they built crosses fro the Columbine killers...
I'm in. :\
No sir, this was an unfortunate DECISION on your part to begin with. One wonders the motive frankly to use that design.
As to something memorializing the 4 terrorists? How about a 4 hogs roasting on a spit? Something feeling the heat of an eternal flame to symbolize the 4 terrorist bastards burning in hell.
Maybe a crescent shattered into four flaming pieces dug into the hole where the plane crashed, surrounded by an elevated halo shape made up of glowing glass spheres, one for each of the passengers. It could be called "The Final Destination".
I have a feeling you may be right. I would hate to see a genuine memorial vandalized, but this one...well, it's a disgrace to start with.
Thanks for the ping!
"Why am I *not* surprised? Contrary to what the AP implies, I can assure you that the complaints from those living in the area, along with at least some of the flight 93 families were quick, loud, and long as soon as the "design" was unveiled locally."
Flight 93 families approved of the original design except one person.... Tom Burnett, whose son was a passenger. He was the only one who recognized the crescent and the meaning. If you go to the site http://new.petitiononline.com/NOCRSCNT/petition.html you will read his comments. They will be on the first page that appears.
I honestly feel that unless you follow a site such as freerepublic, the average person just doesn't know much about things like this. They watch the news on TV, and what does the MSM tell you? I feel that these families are just naive and were sold on the idea when they were told their loved ones were going to be memorialized with a "Crescent of Embrace." Now doesn't that sound so loving? I don't think the park service knows much about Islam either. They just have no idea! I saw the wife of one of the pilots on TV commenting on the contraversy, and she just didn't get it! She couldn't understand what the fuss was about!
ping
"Red Maples in a crescent? Calling all Freepers with chainsaws!"
Do you know that copper nails will kill a tree?
"Who's paying for it, the park service?"
No, YOU are....the taxpayer.
And they want to HONOR the four scumbags who did this? They DESERVE a part of this memorial?
As far as I am concerned, the only memorial the 9/11 hijackers deserve is the mushroom cloud over the f*cking Middle East.
If it's a complete circle, and if it's forty groves, and 40 wind chimes, I will go for it...although I still think better designs could be put forth.
Someone had told me it was 44 which would then also include the terrorists, in which case I am steadfastly against it.
If it's a complete circle, and if it's forty groves, and 40 wind chimes, I will go for it...although I still think better designs could be put forth.
Someone had told me it was 44 which would then also include the terrorists, in which case I am steadfastly against it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.