Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kosovo: Clinton Lied, People Died
World Net Daily ^ | December 1, 2005 | Laurence A. Elder

Posted on 12/01/2005 8:58:07 AM PST by tgambill

Kosovo: Clinton 'lied, people died'?

________________________________________ Posted: December 1, 2005 1:00 a.m. Eastern © 2005 Laurence A. Elder The White House – finally – began pushing back against irresponsible charges that Bush "lied" to the American people in making the case for war.

The garrulous Sen. Ted Kennedy, D-Mass., made many "Bush lied" accusations: "There was no imminent threat. This was made up in Texas, announced in January [2003] to the Republican leadership that war was going to take place and was going to be good politically. This whole thing was a fraud." And Kennedy later intoned on the Senate floor, "Before the war, week after week after week after week, we were told lie after lie after lie after lie."

Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., said, "... [T]he administration intentionally misled the country into war." Anti-war protester Cindy Sheehan, speaking to the president in a TV ad, said, "You were wrong about the weapons of mass destruction. You were wrong about the link between Iraq and al-Qaida. You lied to us, and because of your lies, my son died." Question: If Bush "lied," did former President Clinton "lie" about Kosovo?

Clinton, in a March 24, 1999, Oval Office broadcast, explained his military action in Kosovo: We act to prevent a wider war, to defuse a powder keg at the heart of Europe, that has exploded twice before in this century with catastrophic results ... By acting now, we are upholding our values, protecting our interests and advancing the cause of peace ... Ending this tragedy is a moral imperative. It is also important to America's national interests ... Do our interests in Kosovo justify the dangers to our armed forces? ...

I am convinced that the dangers of acting are far outweighed by the dangers of not acting – dangerous to defenseless people and to our national interests ... I have a responsibility as president to deal with problems such as this before they do permanent harm to our national interests. America has a responsibility to stand with our allies when they are trying to save innocent lives and preserve peace, freedom and stability in Europe. That is what we are doing in Kosovo.

The former president called Kosovo a humanitarian crisis. The New York Times, on April 19, 1999, wrote: In San Francisco on Thursday, President Clinton said that the Serbs had displaced 'over a million Kosovars' and had killed and raped 'thousands upon thousands of them.' From interviews that journalists and relief workers have conducted with scores of refugees from Kosovo, there is no reason to doubt him. But at this point it is also impossible to prove that he is correct.

Actor-activist Mike Farrell, who opposes the Iraq War, nevertheless supported military action in Kosovo, stating:

I am in favor of an intervention ... I was in Rwanda shortly after the slaughter there. I was infuriated then – and am now – that the international community did not step in ... I know that the escalation of violence and violations of human rights in Kosovo have been going on for some time ... I reluctantly find myself supporting the notion that something needed to be done and that it is appropriate for us to act, and if this is the only way, so be it.

But what about Clinton's assertion of the displacement of "over a million Kosovars"? According to USA Today on July 1, 1999:

Many of the figures used by the Clinton administration and NATO to describe the wartime plight of Albanians in Kosovo now appear greatly exaggerated as allied forces take control of the province ... Instead of 100,000 ethnic Albanian men feared murdered by rampaging Serbs, officials now estimate that about 10,000 were killed. But is the 10,000 number accurate? The Orange County Register, in a Nov. 22, 1999, editorial, said:

Months after the bombing has ceased, United Nations and European Union investigations have bolstered what critics had argued: NATO's estimates of Serbian genocide against the Kosovars were greatly overblown. Many observers now think the inflated numbers simply were part of the U.S.-led propaganda effort to build support for the war.

The latest evidence suggests that fewer than 3,000 Kosovars were murdered – horrifying, yes, but not many more than the number of Serbs who were killed by NATO bombing attacks on Yugoslavia, roughly estimated between 3,000 and 5,000 soldiers and civilians. Does this mean that Clinton "lied, people died"? The intelligence turned out to be wrong, very wrong. Something like this always warrants a serious examination of intelligence failures. But intelligence failures, bad intelligence or failing to properly analyze the intelligence is a far cry from accusing a commander in chief of deliberately and intentionally misleading the American people.

Can we, perhaps, now drop the "Bush lied" nonsense, and pursue the business of winning the war against Islamo-fascism? Perhaps?


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: balkans; clintonistas; clintonlegacy; clintonsquagmire; islamofascists; kosovo; kosovoclinton; sorosfluffers; wrongplace; wrongside; wrongtime; wrongwar; x42
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-105 next last

1 posted on 12/01/2005 8:58:08 AM PST by tgambill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: tgambill

Funny how the NY Times and other liberal organs never talk about Kosovo. Why is that?


2 posted on 12/01/2005 9:01:24 AM PST by GianniV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tgambill

Didn't Slick put America on the side of radical muslims in Kosovo?


3 posted on 12/01/2005 9:01:44 AM PST by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tgambill
Thanks for this post, I had been thinking about this point exactly, and was readying it for use in my debates with Liberals. I was not sure of this tactic, but this article pretty much confirms what I have been thinking the last couple of years.

Does anyone recall how many civilians the bombings killed?

4 posted on 12/01/2005 9:03:46 AM PST by Paradox (Just because we are not perfect, does not mean we are not good.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tgambill
gar·ru·lous ( P ) Pronunciation Key (gr-ls, gry-) adj.

Given to excessive and often trivial or rambling talk; tiresomely talkative.

Wordy and rambling: a garrulous speech.

5 posted on 12/01/2005 9:04:31 AM PST by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasCajun

didnt he also bomb a chinese embassy too?


6 posted on 12/01/2005 9:05:20 AM PST by Mr. K (Some days even my lucky rocket ship underpants don't help...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: tgambill
Is it my imagination or has the Bush Lied BS kind of quietened down a bit the last couple of weeks?
7 posted on 12/01/2005 9:12:23 AM PST by SF Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tgambill
The latest evidence suggests that fewer than 3,000 Kosovars were murdered

The recoveries of K-Albanians from the Serbian MUP grounds at Batajnica make any efforts to diminish the number of K-Albanian victims moot - Slobo's regime was murderous, and lost it's mandate to govern non-Serbs by the treatment it meted out to them, and that loss of mandate isn't going to be reversed in Kosovo by any American administration, no matter how hard the Serbs or their allies try to change it.

You'll note that we're in year 5 of the Bush administration, and our recent diplomatic moves in the region, aiming to finish our clean-ups of Milosevic's Bosnia and Kosovo messes, are highly unfavorable to the Serb nationalist interest.

So if taking out their angst on Clinton while we finish the job works for Serbia's dead enders and their proxies, more power to 'em.

8 posted on 12/01/2005 9:20:35 AM PST by Hoplite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GianniV
They swept the entire war under the rug because after 9/11 it is hard to demonize Milosevic who reacted to a Muslim invasion against Christian Serbs.

We hired bin Laden to provide the ground troops for the Islamic jihad against the Christian Serbs. We have created a terrorist Muslim European homeland.

When we pull out of Iraq, the jihadies will head west to finish the job in the Balkans.

I believe there are many European leaders who realize that ultimately a Milosevic solution will be required to save their continent and this is why there is no longer much desire to convict Milosevic for doing what they will be required to do in the future.
9 posted on 12/01/2005 9:38:47 AM PST by Jim_Curtis (Torture works)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Hoplite

So Milocevich was an "imminent" threat to America, possessed WMD and the whole military operation was authorized by the UN, right?


10 posted on 12/01/2005 9:47:03 AM PST by Mi-kha-el ((There is no Pravda in Izvestiya and no Izvestiya in Pravda.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Mi-kha-el
No, he was a brutal dictator who ignored warnings from two successive American administrations that if he continued his course of action, we'd bomb the snot out of him.

Which is exactly what we wound up doing in 1999.

11 posted on 12/01/2005 9:51:57 AM PST by Hoplite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: tgambill
And what, pray tell, was clinton's exit strategy?

Inquiring minds want to know.

Regards,
GtG

12 posted on 12/01/2005 9:57:03 AM PST by Gandalf_The_Gray (I live in my own little world, I like it 'cuz they know me here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hoplite

So why don't the Dems apply the same criteria to this war as they do to the Iraq war. Their criticism of the motives for the Iraq war sounds hollow because of this. Saddam was a brutal dictator who ignored warnings from successive US administrations and the UNSC (17 resolutions)and we bombed the snot out of him. How is it different?


13 posted on 12/01/2005 9:58:28 AM PST by Mi-kha-el ((There is no Pravda in Izvestiya and no Izvestiya in Pravda.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: tgambill

"And Kennedy later intoned on the Senate floor, "Before the war, week after week after week after week, we were told lie after lie after lie after lie."
Then Teddy boy work up and realized it was he was lying week after week.
Of course, he wont admit it. Heck, that would be like calling the police after you drove your car in a lake with a woman drown in the back seat - and we know his history on that score.


14 posted on 12/01/2005 9:59:32 AM PST by truemiester (If the U.S. should fail, a veil of darkness will come over the Earth for a thousand years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mi-kha-el
"So Milocevich was an "imminent" threat to America, possessed WMD and the whole military operation was authorized by the UN, right?"

No, the war in Kosovo was spilling into Albania and was becoming a threat to the stability of the region, which DOES border two NATO members, Greece and Italy.
15 posted on 12/01/2005 10:02:52 AM PST by GAB-1955 (being dragged, kicking and screaming, into the Kingdom of Heaven....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Mi-kha-el
"So Milocevich was an "imminent" threat to America, possessed WMD and the whole military operation was authorized by the UN, right?"

No, the war in Kosovo was spilling into Albania and was becoming a threat to the stability of the region, which DOES border two NATO members, Greece and Italy.
16 posted on 12/01/2005 10:02:53 AM PST by GAB-1955 (being dragged, kicking and screaming, into the Kingdom of Heaven....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Mi-kha-el
So why don't the Dems apply the same criteria to this war as they do to the Iraq war.

Dunno. Don't care. I'm about as interested in Democratic posturing on Iraq as I am Clinton era Republican posturing on the Balkans - it's all for naught as soon as power changes hands and a realistic policy has to be substituted for opportunistic rhetoric.

17 posted on 12/01/2005 10:05:26 AM PST by Hoplite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: GAB-1955

Saddam was spilling into the entire Middle East which contains huge oil resources. Imagine Saddam sitting on Saudi, Kuwaiti and other ...aiti... oil.


18 posted on 12/01/2005 10:22:32 AM PST by Mi-kha-el ((There is no Pravda in Izvestiya and no Izvestiya in Pravda.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Gandalf_The_Gray
"And what, pray tell, was clinton's exit strategy?"

Hand it off to Bush.

Worked pretty good too!

Once again, any current administration will not openly bad-mouth the previous administration's screw ups unless that was the primary focus of their campaign. The worse the screw up the greater effort to make it go away or appear otherwise. I'm firmly convinced that that should have been Reagan's 12th commandment because it seems to be an absolute of American politics.

19 posted on 12/01/2005 10:24:07 AM PST by norton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: GAB-1955

And today, Kosovo is a cradle of peace and stability.


20 posted on 12/01/2005 10:25:28 AM PST by Mi-kha-el ((There is no Pravda in Izvestiya and no Izvestiya in Pravda.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-105 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson