Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Purdue 'Metamaterial' Could Lead To Better Optics, Communications
Science Daily | Purdue University ^ | 2005-11-30

Posted on 11/30/2005 9:13:33 PM PST by sourcery

Engineers at Purdue University are the first researchers to create a material that has a "negative index of refraction" in the wavelength of light used for telecommunications, a step that could lead to better communications and imaging technologies.

"This work represents a milestone because it demonstrates that it is possible to have a negative refractive index in the optical range, which increases the likelihood of harnessing this phenomenon for optics and communications," said Vladimir Shalaev, the Robert and Anne Burnett Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering.

The material consists of tiny parallel "nanorods" of gold that conduct clouds of electrons called "plasmons" with a frequency of light referred to as the near-infrared. The wavelength size of this near-infrared light is 1.5 microns, or millionths of a meter, the same wavelength used for fiberoptic communications.

"This is the most important wavelength for communications," Shalaev said.

Findings are detailed in a paper appearing Dec. 15 in the journal Optics Letters, published by the Optical Society of America. The paper was written by Shalaev, his graduate research assistants Wenshan Cai and Uday K. Chettiar, doctoral student Hsiao-Kuan Yuan, senior research scientists Andrey K. Sarychev and Vladimir P. Drachev, and principal research scientist Alexander V. Kildishev.

The nanorods are an example of materials that are able to reverse a phenomenon called refraction, which occurs as electromagnetic waves, including light, bend when passing from one material into another and is caused by a change in the speed of light as it passes from one medium into another. Scientists measure this bending of radiation by its "index of refraction." Refraction causes the bent-stick-in-water effect, which occurs when a stick placed in a glass of water appears bent when viewed from the outside. Each material has its own refraction index, which describes how much light will bend in that particular material and defines how much the speed of light slows down while passing through a material. All natural materials, such as glass, air and water, have positive refractive indices.

In the late 1960s, researchers hypothesized what would happen if a material had a negative refractive index, causing it to bend light in the opposite direction from ordinary materials. In 2000, researcher John Pendry at the Imperial College London theorized that slabs of such material might be used to create a "superlens" that would drastically improve the quality of medical diagnostic imaging and other technologies. Such lenses theoretically could compensate for the loss of a portion of the light transmitting an image as it passes through a lens. Lenses and imaging systems could be improved if this lost light, which scientists call "evanescent light," could be restored. An imaging system that used a combination of positive and negative refraction might restore the lost evanescent light.

Harnessing materials that have a negative index of refraction could make it possible to take optical images of objects that are smaller than the wavelength of visible light, including molecules such as DNA, for research and medical imaging; the development of "photo-nanolithography," which would make it possible to etch smaller electronic devices and circuits, resulting in more powerful computers; new types of antennas, computer components and consumer electronics such as cell phones that use light instead of electricity for carrying signals and processing information, resulting in faster communications.

A major obstacle now hindering development of opto-electronic devices is that wavelengths of light are too large to fit into the tiny features needed for miniature circuits and components. "Plasmonic nanomaterials," however, could make it possible to squeeze light waves into much smaller spaces, Shalaev said.

Various research groups have fabricated "metamaterials" made of tiny metal rings and rods, which have a negative index of refraction. No metamaterials have yet been created that have negative refraction indices for visible light, but now the Purdue researchers have created the first metamaterial with a negative refractive index in the near-infrared portion of the spectrum. This is just beyond the range of visible light, demonstrating the feasibility of applying the concept to communications and computers.

"The challenge was to fabricate a structure that would have not only an electrical response, but also a magnetic response in the near-infrared range," Shalaev said.

The gold nanorods conduct clouds of electrons, all moving in unison as if they were a single object instead of millions of individual electrons. These groups of electrons are known collectively as plasmons. Light from a laser or other source was shined onto the nanorods, inducing an "electro-optical current" in the tiny circuit. Each of the rods is about as wide as 100 nanometers, or 100 billionths of a meter, and 700 nanometers long.

"These rods basically conduct current because they are a metal, producing an effect we call optical inductance, while a material between the rods produces another effect called optical capacitance," Shalaev said. "The result is the formation of a very small electromagnetic circuit, but this circuit works in higher frequencies than normal circuits, in a portion of the spectrum we call optical frequencies, which includes the near-infrared. So we have created a structure that works as kind of an optical circuit and interacts effectively with both of the field components of light: electrical and magnetic."

The research has been funded by the U.S. Army Research Office and the National Science Foundation and is affiliated with Purdue's Birck Nanotechnology Center at Discovery Park, the university's hub for interdisciplinary research.

"Although many researchers are skeptical about developing materials with a negative index of refraction in optical wavelengths and then using them in practical technologies, I think the challenges are mainly engineering problems that could eventually be overcome," Shalaev said. "There is no fundamental law of physics that would prevent this from happening."


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

1 posted on 11/30/2005 9:13:34 PM PST by sourcery
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv; Ernest_at_the_Beach; FairOpinion; phatoldphart; SunkenCiv

Ping


2 posted on 11/30/2005 9:14:13 PM PST by sourcery (Either the Constitution trumps stare decisis, or else the Constitution is a dead letter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sourcery

I thought Metamaterial was a kind of laxative.


3 posted on 11/30/2005 9:19:43 PM PST by billorites (freepo ergo sum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sourcery
Do they mean an index of refraction less than unity? Implies they've found a way to make light propagate at a speed in excess of c

Or do they really mean the index of refraction is negative? Wouldn't a cube-corner mirror have a negative index of refraction, strictly speaking?

Questions, questions, questions, in the mind of today's concerned young person. < / zappa>

4 posted on 11/30/2005 9:21:12 PM PST by Steely Tom (Fortunately, the Bill of Rights doesn't include the word 'is'.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billorites
I thought Metamaterial was a kind of laxative.

I guess you might think of a material with a negative index of refraction as a sort of laxative for light waves.

5 posted on 11/30/2005 9:21:17 PM PST by sourcery (Either the Constitution trumps stare decisis, or else the Constitution is a dead letter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom
Or do they really mean the index of refraction is negative?

That's my assumption.

6 posted on 11/30/2005 9:22:56 PM PST by sourcery (Either the Constitution trumps stare decisis, or else the Constitution is a dead letter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sourcery
I'd rather have a gravitational lens for my camera - it would be a beautiful apochromat, all wavelengths bent identically. But it would suck in all the dust from a mile around.
7 posted on 11/30/2005 9:25:15 PM PST by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billorites
I thought Metamaterial was a kind of laxative.

Yeah... My Grandmother used it.... ;-)

8 posted on 11/30/2005 9:37:53 PM PST by NoCmpromiz (John 14:6 is a non-pluaralistic statement.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare

See around corners ping....


9 posted on 11/30/2005 9:39:12 PM PST by NoCmpromiz (John 14:6 is a non-pluaralistic statement.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sourcery

Sounds like it might have applications both in optical computers and high-power lasers.


10 posted on 11/30/2005 9:39:52 PM PST by Ostlandr (Hillary Clinton and Chuck Schumer do NOT represent me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom
"These rods basically conduct current because they are a metal, producing an effect we call optical inductance, while a material between the rods produces another effect called optical capacitance," Shalaev said. "The result is the formation of a very small electromagnetic circuit, but this circuit works in higher frequencies than normal circuits, in a portion of the spectrum we call optical frequencies, which includes the near-infrared. So we have created a structure that works as kind of an optical circuit and interacts effectively with both of the field components of light: electrical and magnetic."

Do they mean an index of refraction less than unity? Implies they've found a way to make light propagate at a speed in excess of c

A "material" with a refractive index less than that of vacuum would imply a electromagnetic wave propagating faster than c. I'm not a physicist, but I don't think that's what is going on here. It sounds like this material is made of nanoscopic LC circuits, or natural oscillators. Electromagnetic waves propagate due to the mutual creation of electric field from a changing magnetic field, and the creation of magnetic field from a changing electric field. When waves enter this material, the energy osicllates between the nano capacitors and inductors. The oscillations occur in the frequencies of 10^5 cycles per second, so when light with this frequency enters the material, it resonates along the oscillating circuits, and leaves the material without much absorption. I still don't understand why the rays would bend away from the normal to the surface, as when leaving a more dense material.

11 posted on 11/30/2005 10:03:07 PM PST by Liberal Classic (No better friend, no worse enemy. Semper Fi.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Liberal Classic

Perhaps it means that the angle of exit is greater than the angle of incidence, and a function thereof.

Cool stuff!


12 posted on 11/30/2005 10:18:28 PM PST by Atlas Sneezed (Your FRiendly FReeper Patent Attorney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

bump


13 posted on 11/30/2005 11:23:10 PM PST by AmericanArchConservative (Armour on, Lances high, Swords out, Bows drawn, Shields front ... Eagles UP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #14 Removed by Moderator

To: Liberal Classic
Perhaps what they mean is that the material has a negative... what is that called? The derivative of refractive index with respect to frequency. The "dispersive coefficient" or something like that (I admit I've forgotten a lot about optics, which I had hoped to do big things in sigh). Maybe they've found a way to make that negative. That would imply self-focussing behavior, wouldn't it?

If they can make little L-C circuits that operate at optical frequencies, they could set up transmission line behavior in the bulk material, and they could modulate that behavior with respect to depth, etc.

15 posted on 12/01/2005 5:01:32 AM PST by Steely Tom (Fortunately, the Bill of Rights doesn't include the word 'is'.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Beelzebubba

For ordinary refractors the angle of exit is greater than the angle of incidence. When a ray of light hits glass at an angle, the light ray is bent towards the line perpendicular to the surface. When the ray exits, the light ray is bent away from the line perpendicular to the surface.

I think what they're saying is the angle of refraction is greater than the angle of incidence, and the angle of exit is *less* than the angle of incidence, as if the material were less dense than air or the speed of light were faster in it than in air.

It is cool stuff! :)


16 posted on 12/01/2005 5:26:30 AM PST by Liberal Classic (No better friend, no worse enemy. Semper Fi.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: sourcery

The article didn't say, but I wonder if Julian Phillips had a hand in this project.

He went to Purdue, ya know.


17 posted on 12/01/2005 5:38:41 AM PST by bert (K.E. ; N.P . Peta girls end up as spinsters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

I don't claim to know a lot about optics, just some of the basics. Different light rays refact at different angles, which is why a prism separates light into the spectrum, right? So there is a change in refractive index with respect to the frequency of the wave. I guess they're claiming for some waves entering this material, the change is going the other way.

Since this material is made of tiny osillators, it must be sensitive to certain frequencies, or certain frequencies resonate within it. I think they said it acts like a conductor. They must have found something that acts peculiarly at certain freqencies, but not at others. The article says they have it refracting light into the infrared range, but not the visible range. Does this mean it is opaque to visible light, or does it refract normally?

I honestly don't understand how this would be self-focusing. I also don't understand how this could be used to focus light on objects smaller than one wavelength. Wouldn't interference destroy any image? Looking at interference patterns is one of the ways we image very small objects, such as Watson and Cricks x-ray interference patter of a DNA molecule. I can kind of understand how this would be a good conductor, for certain frequencies especially.

Cool stuff, indeed!


18 posted on 12/01/2005 5:45:31 AM PST by Liberal Classic (No better friend, no worse enemy. Semper Fi.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Liberal Classic

Go Boilermakers! Ping


19 posted on 12/01/2005 5:50:16 AM PST by steveyp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

How about a materials science ping, just for something different?


20 posted on 12/01/2005 5:56:41 AM PST by Liberal Classic (No better friend, no worse enemy. Semper Fi.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson