Skip to comments.
Hillary Meter: Support Falls to 2005 Low
Rasmussen Reports ^
Posted on 11/30/2005 6:05:16 AM PST by slowhand520
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 next last
To: slowhand520
There will be a lot of headlines about this news in the next few days with a lot of analysis about why her numbers are at record lows.
2
posted on
11/30/2005 6:06:56 AM PST
by
AD from SpringBay
(We have the government we allow and deserve.)
To: slowhand520
Heh heh heh.
Run, Hillie, run...
3
posted on
11/30/2005 6:07:37 AM PST
by
mewzilla
(Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
To: slowhand520
I won't be satisfied until the day after the 2008 elections and the MSM is full of 'what happened'? stories.
4
posted on
11/30/2005 6:07:47 AM PST
by
IncPen
(Because it's not your money, Senator Kennedy. It's mine, and I'd like to keep it)
To: IncPen
That is always the case because they "get high on their own supply" meaning they fall victim to their own bogus polls. In essence the lie becomes the truth to them and after elections it is always "What went wrong?"
To: slowhand520
6% say she's conservative? Must be the San Francisco sample.......
6
posted on
11/30/2005 6:10:04 AM PST
by
Red Badger
(There are no female angels..............)
To: slowhand520
To: slowhand520
That is always the case because they "get high on their own supply" meaning they fall victim to their own bogus polls. In essence the lie becomes the truth to them and after elections it is always "What went wrong?" The worst thing any politico can do to themselves is to believe their own propaganda............
8
posted on
11/30/2005 6:11:43 AM PST
by
Red Badger
(There are no female angels..............)
To: slowhand520
I wonder how she is going to cheat, lie, steal and scratch her way to the WH?
I hope this continues.
9
posted on
11/30/2005 6:11:51 AM PST
by
freekitty
To: IncPen
'what happened' to be followed by the moon bats howling 'the election was stolen!'
10
posted on
11/30/2005 6:12:04 AM PST
by
socialismisinsidious
(Liberals are all about choice UNTIL you choose differently than them.)
To: mewzilla
If everyone is concentrated in The Beast, someone else may slip in and take us unawares.........
11
posted on
11/30/2005 6:13:07 AM PST
by
Red Badger
(There are no female angels..............)
To: slowhand520
In 2008, when all is said and done... this gender-challenged socialist will get the same support as the spine-challenged socialist did in 2004.
12
posted on
11/30/2005 6:13:19 AM PST
by
johnny7
(“You have a corpse in a car, minus a head, in the garage. Take me to it.”)
To: slowhand520
I just wish everyone on this site would pay attention to these numbers and stop talking about her as a threat. These numbers have shown up in other polls as well. She CAN'T WIN giving up 4 of 10 voters before she starts.
13
posted on
11/30/2005 6:14:21 AM PST
by
jmaroneps37
(We will never murtha to the terrorists. Bring home the troops means bring home the war.)
To: slowhand520
The Push Back is having an effect. The Donks, and
Hillary! in particular, overextended themselves on the War and immigration. Now they look like idiots and the President looks like the only responsible adult in Washington.
Today, Hillary! is returning to offend-nobody, focus-tested "Small Ball" initiatives like regulating violence in video games and pork projects like extending the clean-up zone at Ground Zero into Long Island. The great themes of War and Peace and National Security have been lost to the President.
But the days of Sistah Souljah and mandatory bicycle helments for kiddie-poos are over. People aren't going to fall for that sort of window-dressing anymore. Unless Hillary! can come up with credible solutions to the big issues, she is toast.
14
posted on
11/30/2005 6:14:26 AM PST
by
gridlock
(eliminate perverse incentives)
To: socialismisinsidious
The irony here is that she has tried to given the appearance of a hawk on the war debate. I wonder what this means for the shrill defeateist dems?
15
posted on
11/30/2005 6:15:22 AM PST
by
Wristpin
( Varitek says to A-Rod: "We don't throw at .260 hitters.....")
To: Red Badger
I'm more concerned with Hillie on the ticket as a veep. Ot any Dems who wins the election suddenly needing a veep and picking Hillie.
Bottom line: Don't want to risk having another Toon in the WH, don't vote Dem or RINO (in the primaries).
16
posted on
11/30/2005 6:15:43 AM PST
by
mewzilla
(Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
To: slowhand520
"Twenty-eight percent (28%) of Americans say New York's junior Senator is "very likely" to win the Democratic nomination in 2008. Another 26% say she is "somewhat likely" to be the party's nominee. Senator Clinton leads the pack among Democratic Primary voters, attracting more votes than the next three candidates combined.
17
posted on
11/30/2005 6:17:06 AM PST
by
kabar
To: slowhand520
To: mewzilla
The Beast will be nobody's second banana.........(pun intended)......
19
posted on
11/30/2005 6:17:57 AM PST
by
Red Badger
(There are no female angels..............)
To: Red Badger
Not for long, anyway. That's the problem.
20
posted on
11/30/2005 6:18:48 AM PST
by
mewzilla
(Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson