Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Income Tax and How it Undermines the U.S. Economy
OpinionEditorials.Com ^ | November 28, 2005 | Chris Liakos

Posted on 11/28/2005 1:46:25 PM PST by Eaglewatcher

On one day every year, more money is spent by Americans than has been spent on the whole Iraq War. This day is not Christmas or Valentine's Day, or any such fun day as that. This day is April 15, the deadline for Income Tax filing. In case you missed it, filing your Federal Income Taxes is not nearly as fun as opening presents on Christmas morning. It's not even close. Not only is it not fun, but Federal Income Taxes are a huge drain on the American economy, to the tune of $500 billion in 2002, according to the Tax Foundation (Boortz 49).

How did this figure come about? An estimated 5.8 billion hours spent by individuals, businesses, and non-profit organizations in compliance with our monstrosity of a tax code cost Americans approximately $194 billion in 2002 (Boortz 43). Established by the 16th Amendment on February 12, 1913, and having gone through approximately 35 years of reform, the current IRS tax code exceeds 54,000 pages and contains some 2.8 million words (Americans for Fair Taxation). Individuals and businesses usually have to hire professionals called CPAs to interpret and correctly file their taxes.

Not only are these explicit costs crippling, but how much worse are the implicit costs, or in other words, the opportunity costs? Think about it this way: those 5.8 billion hours are not being spent producing anything. As Neal Boortz correctly puts it in his new book, The FairTax Book, that figure is equivalent to the lifespan of 8,700 Americans (Boortz 43). That's almost three times as many people as died on September 11, 2001, every year! Boortz goes further with this analogy:

"What kind of workforce would it take to cover those 5.8 billion hours? If you figure a standard workweek - eight hours a day, five days a week, a few weeks every year off for vacation - it adds up to a workforce of more than 2.77 million people. That's more than the auto industry, the computer manufacturing industry, the aircraft manufacturing industry, talk radio, and the steel industry in the United States combined. (43-4)"

The current tax code continues to cost businesses money in this way: businesses are forced to make tax-decisions instead of economic decisions. That means, instead of making corporate decisions based on what is best for the company's profit, the corporations make decisions based on the lowest-cost tax implications. This hurts businesses in two ways: First, businesses lose potential earnings because the IRS tax code would penalize them for certain decisions. Second, as more of an opportunity cost, business executives actually have to spend time and money on figuring out the tax implications of their decisions. So, not only do the decisions they are forced to make hurt them, but they have to take the time to make those decisions. Corporations could be investing money back into their company, thus growing it and providing more jobs, but instead are having to waste time avoiding high taxes. How much money is lost here?

It is probably impossible to calculate the exact value of all of this time wasted by every American who files Federal Income Taxes, but the Tax Foundation has estimated that, opportunity costs added with the $194 billion compliance cost mentioned earlier, equals a total cost for America exceeding $500 billion. But wait, there's more.

What about embedded taxes? Don't think for a minute that businesses manage the whole tax burden by themselves. They pass a lot of the burden on to consumers, by raising the prices of their goods and services. That's right, you as a consumer are paying an average 22 cents out of every dollar to the businesses to cover their tax costs (Boortz 55). Not only do businesses have to pass the cost on to the consumers they serve, but also to their own employees. If businesses didn't lose money to the IRS, they could afford to pay their employees higher salaries and give them more benefits, including health care and vacation time.

An additional problem with the IRS tax structure is that it creates a desire to move companies overseas. Moving manufacturing plants and corporate headquarters to countries like Germany actually saves money for businesses. Places like Germany, although they don't have a great tax code, certainly have a more economically beneficent tax code. But when businesses move overseas, often referred to as outsourcing, America suffers. Jobs that should be given to Americans are instead given to people who live in those other countries. Additionally, because the regulatory costs and the costs of production are lower in those countries, those products, cars for example, become cheaper and more competitive, further reducing the amount of business done with American companies.

These offshore financial centers shelter trillions of dollars from any participation in the American economy. “[T]he 2000 Merrill Lynch & Gemini Consulting study World Wealth Report estimates that one third of he wealth of the world's high-net-worth individuals is held offshore. How much would that be? Try $11 trillion - $11 trillion sucked out of the American economy, all of it immune to the tax obligations you suffer every April 15 (Boortz 97).

Imagine if all of these trillions of dollars were added back to the American economy. On top of that, imagine saving the $500 billion compliance costs every year. These two things would give a huge boost to the American economy. Fortunately, there is a plan to make this happen, a plan sponsored by Georgia Representative John Linder. The plan is called The FairTax, or H.R. 25.

Bibliography Boortz, Neal & John Linder. The FairTax Book. New York: HarperCollins Publishers, 2005.

McConnell, Campbell R. & Stanley L. Brue. Economics: Principles, Problems, and Policies. 16th ed. McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2005. Online. Americans for Fair Taxation. . Online. Tax Foundation. .

###

Chris Liakos is a Political Science major in the University of Georgia. He serves as President of the Georgia Perimeter College Political Science Club in Lawrenceville. After campaiging for the GOP in the Fall of 2004, Chris started a chapter of Students for Saving Social Security at his local campus.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Government
KEYWORDS: economy; fair; fairtax; tax
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last
To: Eaglewatcher

Taxes are just another form of oppression.


21 posted on 11/28/2005 4:59:14 PM PST by Tarpon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Irontank

Yes, but with the FairTax we have a chance to get at least a piece of it back. It's a start and a good one. It will help the country economically a great deal - and individual taxpayers as well.


22 posted on 11/28/2005 5:21:04 PM PST by pigdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: RetiredArmy
Remember, a democrat started it, said it would go away after the war. That was 60 plus years ago, and that baby is still growing.

Actually it started before the war and was promised to only affect the rich, the rich at that time earned about 5000 per year. It was a flat tax and was perverted into the sliding scale during WWII and that was promised to end at the end of the war but it took up until the 80s for it to change at all. The upper bracket at the time of the end of the war was 90 percent!

This is why us old timers are against a flat tax and want a new system. We have seen what happens if any income tax at all is in place. It will eventually return to what we have now. Fair tax or the equivalent is the only way to go.

23 posted on 11/28/2005 5:50:30 PM PST by calex59 (Seeing the light shouldn't make you blind...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tarpon

Indeed. By definition, a 100% tax rate is slavery.


24 posted on 11/28/2005 5:52:07 PM PST by abb (Because News Reporting is too important to be left to the Journalists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Dick Bachert

This would make a great post! If you are not interested I will be glad to post it with your permission.


25 posted on 11/28/2005 6:09:39 PM PST by Eaglewatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Eaglewatcher; Taxman; pigdog; Principled; EternalVigilance; rwrcpa1; phil_will1; kevkrom; ...
A Taxreform bump for you all.

If anyone would like to be added to this ping list let me know.

John Linder in the House(HR25) & Saxby Chambliss Senate(S25) offer a comprehensive bill to kill all income and SS/Medicare payroll taxes outright and replace them with with a national retail sales tax administered by the states.

H.R.25,S.25
A bill to promote freedom, fairness, and economic opportunity by repealing the income tax and other taxes, abolishing the Internal Revenue Service, and enacting a national retail sales tax to be administered primarily by the States.

Refer for additional information:


26 posted on 11/28/2005 6:18:52 PM PST by ancient_geezer (Don't reform it, Replace it!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ancient_geezer

Fair Tax major BUMP! I read the book, too! 8)


27 posted on 11/28/2005 6:22:23 PM PST by Raffus (God Bless the US, the US Troops and Happy Veterans' Day!!!!,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: RetiredArmy

I have not seen any of our Republican friends doing anything to get rid of the income tax. We get BS about cutting this exemption and loosening that one. All they are doing is shifting the numbers around. There will never be any tax repealed in this country unless we sweep every one of them out of office every election cycle for the next 24 years. I noticed how our GOP leadership would not cut any pork out of the budget to pay for this hurricane relief.


28 posted on 11/28/2005 6:30:35 PM PST by satchmodog9 ( Seventy million spent on the lefts Christmas present and all they got was a Scooter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

placemark


29 posted on 11/28/2005 6:37:34 PM PST by dread78645 (Sorry Mr. Franklin, We couldn't keep it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: calex59

Fer shure!!!


30 posted on 11/28/2005 7:22:19 PM PST by pigdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: RetiredArmy; Your Nightmare; pigdog; Always Right; ancient_geezer; Principled; Taxman; Bigun; ...
Actually the income tax began as a Constitutional amendment in 1913 and was sold to the voters as a tax on the very top tier of income earners. The "tax" you speak of is the act of withholding portions of a paycheck to prepay the income tax. It was sold as a war measure and the country was assured it would be repealed after the war.

Now we know that both were lies. Maybe not lies when they were told but lies manifested none the less. It is up to us, the people, to do something. There are representatives in congress and the Senate who are sponsoring the fair tax.

There is a huge bureaucracy in Washington and Virginia that feasts off of the tax receipts from the hard working people in this country. They are career slum lords overseeing their real estate for profit only, not for the betterment of their tenants. This huge bureauracy, unelected, is the tyranny that Jefferson, Adams, Franklin, Mason et.al. warned us about. They are bloodsuckers and do not have our interests at heart. They only understand power.

Though unelected they wield considerable power as we can see every day with the major cabinet offices. We, as productive citizens are subject to the whims of millions of unnecessary regulations that bind our creative abilities like tethered sheep.

This bureaucratic morass is extremely entwined with the so called "K-Street" gang of lobbyists who spend millions of dollars of corporate money (the money we all earn for statists corporations as their loyal servants) to bribe the very people we send to congress to clean up the mess. Congress, on the other hand, is strapped by a wicked news media who have decided that the truth lies in government and we should all be a collective bunch of sissies. If any story depicts an individual accomplishment it is spiked in favor of an individual accomplishing because of a government program. You know the drill.

The fair tax, whether you agree with it or not, is at least a step toward ridding ourselves of what has become a hundred times worse than King George's tax on tea. If you don't agree with it please tell the rest of us how we can get rid of K-Street and its intertwined bureaucracy.

Otherwise, shut the hell up and go home.

31 posted on 11/28/2005 7:27:50 PM PST by groanup (shred for Ian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants; RetiredArmy; Bigun; Dick Bachert; ancient_geezer; pigdog; Principled
Actually it is the Second Plank of the Communist Manifesto:

"2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax."

And, since you brought it up, here are the other nine:

"1. Abolition of property in land and application of all rents of land to public purposes.

"3. Abolition of all rights of inheritance.

"4. Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels.

"5. Centralization of credit in the banks of the state, by means of a national bank with state capital and an exclusive monopoly.

"6. Centralization of the means of communication and transport in the hands of the state.

"7. Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the state; the bringing into cultivation of waste lands, and the improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a common plan.

"8. Equal obligation of all to work. Establishment of industrial armies, especially for agriculture.

"9. Combination of agriculture with manufacturing industries; gradual abolition of all the distinction between town and country by a more equable distribution of the populace over the country.

"10. Free education for all children in public schools. Abolition of children's factory labor in its present form. Combination of education with industrial production, etc."

Do you recognize any of the other nine that are firmly in place in the United States of America?

The (our) enemies of FReedom have been hard at work, and rather successful, wouldn't you say?

A man much wiser than I once said that Eternal Vigilance is the price of FReedom.

I'd have to say that we have not been vigilant.

However, all is not lost: We the People have an opportunity to begin the process of taking our country back by electing Senators and Representatives who will vote for the FairTax, H.R. 25 and S. 25.

That is just the first step, mind you. There is a lot more to be done after the FairTax becomes law of the land.

32 posted on 11/28/2005 7:52:13 PM PST by Taxman (So that the beautiful pressure does not diminish!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Dick Bachert

Why did I know that you would post Skousen's article on this thread? LOL!

Thanks, Dick. Hope all is well with you and yours and that you had a wonderful Thanksgiving.


33 posted on 11/28/2005 7:54:08 PM PST by Taxman (So that the beautiful pressure does not diminish!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: groanup; All

We, as productive citizens are subject to the whims of millions of unnecessary regulations that bind our creative abilities like tethered sheep.

The first section addresses many bogus laws -- victimless "crimes" -- beyond the WOD. The remainder addresses Taxman's 64 post. "You" is used generically directed toward those that support violating persons unalienable rights.

If a person thinks they have been harmed by another person's act of possessing a drug then the person should take the drug possessor to court and convince an impartial jury. That way the "victim" may gain restitution for his or her pain and suffering.

You've never done that because you know that even if the judge didn't refuse the case as frivolous it would be highly improbable that you'd ever convince an impartial jury that the mere act of a person possessing drugs caused you harm. 

Instead, you'll argue that drug possession and or use causes harm to society -- causes harm to the group. You'll take a communitarian stand. Of course, you'll have to turn a blind eye to reality. That is, for a group of people to exist there is a prerequisite that first the individual must exist. 

Each time an individual is sacrificed -- in whole or in part -- the group suffers a loss.  Protect the rights of the smallest minority -- the lone individual -- and the rights of all minorities and the majority are protected.

The federal government creates each year, on average, 3,000 new laws and regulations. Each one of those laws has people that support it and will argue why the new law is necessary. Proclaiming that without those new laws people and society will run headlong into destruction.

In reality virtually every person breaks one or more laws several times a year. Yet with every person violating the law people and society have not moved toward self-destruction. Instead, individuals and society have increasingly prospered.

Over the past several years and decades people and society increasingly prospered despite not having the supposed benefits of future laws yet to come. Today, people and society increasingly prosper despite not having the supposed benefits of next year's new laws or, new laws to come five, ten or fifteen years in the future.

Ninety-eight percent of the people do not knowingly initiate force, threat of force or fraud against any person or their property. Though, through widespread ignorance most people negligently support government initiation of force/harm against persons and their property. See War of Two Worlds below.

Setting aside for the moment that government officials in all three branches of government violate laws, if it were possible to apprehend all lawbreakers next week, society would run headlong into destruction. It would come to a screeching halt.

As it is, a very small fraction of lawbreakers are ever apprehended for the laws they violate. The few that are apprehended and punished cause a drain on their lives, families and society. Meanwhile everybody else that violates the same laws, while semi free, pay the price of having their brothers and sisters sacrificed for the greater good of society.

The beneficiaries are the politicians, bureaucrats and their automatons. They're parasites leeching off The People, the hosts. Value destroyers draining value producers.

Ir really is a war, to the death, between two groups of people: 64

War of Two Worlds

Value Producers
vs.
Value Destroyers

Politicians and bureaucrats work diligently to hide and numb much of the emotional dismay and stress that people would otherwise experience from funding the government. There's the politician and bureaucrat acting in a paternalistic superiority over ordinary people as demonstrated by the treatment they give the "patients". That treatment is to create an illusion that masks the pain while never addressing the real problem. 

In fact they dare not address the real problem because they are the problem. For they create problems that need not exist in the first place. Problems that drain wealth and hinder the progress of people and society. The people pay trillions of dollars each year for that.

Solution: make the method of paying taxes transparent to everyone. Let each person experience the pain and dismay of paying taxes and soon, very soon in mass, people will increasingly reign in government spending and lawmaking.

In all probability the FairTax is the most transparent.

Benefits of the FairTax

Rep. Bill Archer, Chairman, House Ways and Means Committee:

"A recent survey was done, in Europe and Japan, of the major corporations and I was astounded at the results. They were asked, 'If the US abolished its income tax and went to a sales tax, would that have any impact on your decisions?' Eighty percent of the corporations said they would build their factories in the United States of America. Twenty percent said they would move their international headquarters to the United States of America." 

That's the short list. For more information see fairtax.org or search: "national sales tax" OR "national retail sales tax"

34 posted on 11/28/2005 8:06:40 PM PST by Zon (Honesty outlives the lie, spin and deception -- It always has -- It always will.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Eaglewatcher
I favor the Fair Tax not principally to get rid of the IRS, although I think its great. I favor it since it would force Americans to pay the bill for government openly every time they make a purchase. People would able to see up front exactly how much government is costing them. That's the key in my view to both reducing spending and our tax burden. Under our current income tax, the cost of government is hidden from public view and tax cuts never really affect the overall spending picture to the extent people think.

(Denny Crane: "I Don't Want To Socialize With A Pinko Liberal Democrat Commie.Say What You Like About Republicans. We Stick To Our Convictions. Even When We Know We're Dead Wrong.")

35 posted on 11/28/2005 8:27:32 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Taxman

Eternal Vigilance is the price of FReedom.

And the lack of which contains its own punishment.

"The condition upon which God hath given liberty to man is eternal vigilance; which condition if he break, servitude is at once the consequence of his crime and the punishment of his guilt."
-John Philpot Curran: Speech upon the Right of Election, 1790.


36 posted on 11/28/2005 11:31:25 PM PST by ancient_geezer (Don't reform it, Replace it!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

What you should know about Ross Perot's campaign is that he got in because Hillary had promised him that his company, Perot Systems, would manage the new national healthcare system. He spent little of his own money and the "volunteers" did all the work. He succeeded in giving us the Clintons, which was his goal. Too bad for him he didn't cash in on the healthcare program and too bad for us and the country we got the Clintons for eight years. Perot is not near the patriot that he pretends.


37 posted on 11/28/2005 11:41:15 PM PST by Mind-numbed Robot (Not all that needs to be done needs to be done by the government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Taxman

Frank,
Because you're one of the smarter people frequenting FR (for a squid)? LOL
And you're clairvoyant??
And you know how my alleged mind works???
Have a Merry CHRISTmas, guy!!


38 posted on 11/29/2005 5:13:42 AM PST by Dick Bachert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Mind-numbed Robot
Where did you get this information on Perot and the Clintons? It is fascinating and certainly fits. But where did it come from?
39 posted on 11/29/2005 5:21:43 AM PST by Eaglewatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: ancient_geezer; EternalVigilance

Mr. Curran got it right -- too bad his words of wisdom are not well known.


40 posted on 11/29/2005 5:27:10 AM PST by Taxman (So that the beautiful pressure does not diminish!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson