Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Battleship Film Revives Japan's Pride In Wartime Generation
The telegraph (UK) ^ | 11-28-2005

Posted on 11/27/2005 4:41:55 PM PST by blam

Battleship film revives Japan's pride in wartime generation

(Filed: 28/11/2005)

Sixty years after the colossal battleship Yamato was sunk, the pride of Japan's wartime navy is once again an object of fascination.

Almost 400,000 visitors have flocked to see a full-scale replica of the deck of the Yamato in Onomichi, western Japan. The ship was reconstructed for the shooting of a film, Men of the Yamato, which will be released next month.

The £3million replica deck, made for the film Men of the Yamato, has attracted 400,000 Japanese visitors

The Yamato, the largest battleship ever built, was considered indestructible by the Japanese. But little more than three years after it was completed it was sunk in the East China Sea in April 1945 on a suicidal mission that cost the lives of almost its entire crew of 3,000 men.

The film does not glorify the sacrifice, graphically portraying the anguish of the crew's families and the bloody end to which the men came as their ship was swarmed by US Navy planes.

But, like other recent Japanese war movies, it glosses over Tokyo's aggression and focuses instead on the bravery and comradeship of the men who fought.

Growing tension in East Asia, particularly since North Korea launched a missile over Japanese airspace in 1998, has led to a rethink of the post-war commitment to pacifism. As Japan's Self Defence Forces have been despatched to provide logistical support for the US-led war in Afghanistan and to Iraq for post-war reconstruction, it has become more acceptable to be interested in military matters.

The true hero of the film is the Yamato itself. The production company Toei spent £3 million building the replica deck to ensure the film gives a powerful sense of the scale of the ship and the awe it inspired in the wartime nation.

The ship displaced 65,000 tons and was 862 feet long but was largely obsolete by the time it was built. The Japanese attack on Pearl Harbour amply demonstrated the vulnerability of battleships to aerial attack.

The anniversary of the ship's sinking was also marked in April by the opening of a museum dedicated to the Yamato in Kure, near Hiroshima, where the original was built. The museum displays items recovered from the Yamato after it was located on the sea bed in 1985.

Under pressure to take a larger share of the burden of fighting in 1945, the Japanese navy elected to turn the Yamato into a gigantic kamikaze ship. With neither air cover nor enough fuel to return, the Yamato was ordered to sail to Okinawa, where the Americans were fighting their way on to Japanese soil.

It was destroyed the day after setting sail, becoming the epitome of the "smashed jewel", a rallying cry for the entire nation to achieve beauty in defeat by dying without surrendering.

The Yamato continues to loom large in popular consciousness. One of the country's most famous cartoon series is Spaceship Yamato, set in a future when the Yamato is recovered from the sea and flown into space. Yamato model ships are the must-have toy for boys.

The Yamato offers the Japanese a relatively safe outlet for feelings of pride in - and sympathy for - the war generation. Few express admiration for the wartime leaders or for soldiers who fought in China, for example, where massacres were committed.

But the navy's reputation was not sullied by atrocities while its leader, Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto, opposed the catastrophic war with the United States.

The young sailors of the Yamato are widely seen as victims, who fought bravely to protect their country even as they were betrayed.

The film's director, Junya Sato, has stressed it is an anti-war film. "We need to think about what needs to be done so that Japan doesn't go to war again. Making a film about the Yamato is a step in that direction," he said.

However, others fear a negative reaction from a war movie which focuses only on Japanese suffering.

"Given the strained relations with China I wonder whether this is a good time to make this movie. It could be misunderstood as glorifying the ship and the war," said one visitor to the reconstructed Yamato.


TOPICS: Japan; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: battleship; eastchinasea; film; generation; japan; japans; midway; militaryhistory; musashi; pearlharbor; pride; revives; toratoratora; wartime; worldwareleven; wwii; yamato
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last
To: jim_trent
The Japanese Flattop that was sunk by a single torpedo was the Taiho. I believe it was the Albacore, (I'm at work and don't have access to my reference materials.) The fish would not have sunk the Taiho by itself but she was brand new, and had no damage control training. The torpedo ruptured a avgas tank. Somebody turned the ships fans back on to disperse the fumes. The real effect was to turn the Taiho into a ginormous FAE. When the inevitable spark set it off, it made a MOAB look like an M-80.
61 posted on 11/28/2005 8:48:08 AM PST by 75thOVI (Navy son, Navy vet, Navy husband........Marine dad. What's up with that?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: blam

Star Blazers ROCKED.


62 posted on 11/28/2005 8:49:18 AM PST by Centurion2000 ((Aubrey, Tx) --- America, we get the best government corporations can buy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Yes, I think it was the very early 60's. I would have been 12 in 1960. Agreed that the Iowa class were much prettier. And faster, according to what I've read today.


63 posted on 11/28/2005 9:35:19 AM PST by Sam Cree (absolute reality) - "Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one." Albert Einstein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: 91B

I just finished reading "Last Stand of the Tin Can Sailors". What a great book!


64 posted on 11/28/2005 9:40:26 AM PST by IGOTMINE (Front Sight. Press. Follow Through. It's a way of life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: GonzoGOP

Excellent point about the impact those ships could have had off Guadalcanal. They could have engaged in shore bombardment and REALLY plastered Henderson field, but then again Henderson was shelled repeatedly by Kongo class BB's and still kept in the fight.

No tellin', but I'm glad those ships stayed in home waters.


65 posted on 11/28/2005 9:51:34 AM PST by IGOTMINE (Front Sight. Press. Follow Through. It's a way of life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
I must respectfully disagree. The Iowa's armor was not quite as heavy, but better arranged. The 16" heavy shell the Iowas fired was very nearly as good as the Yamato's 18.1" Where the Iowa shines is in speed, (sets the range of battle) and fire control. Outside of 20kyds the Iowa basically disassembles the Yamato. The Yamato never demonstrated the ability to hit anything smaller than the Pacific. Most if not all of the damage to the "Taffys" off Samar was from the heavy cruisers. Luck and the "fog of war" would always be a factor, but I'd put my money on Iowa.

"There is no battleship but Iowa, and South Dakota is her prophet."
66 posted on 11/28/2005 9:57:36 AM PST by 75thOVI (Navy son, Navy vet, Navy husband........Marine dad. What's up with that?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: IGOTMINE
IMHO the attack of the DD's and DE's of Taffy 3 is one of the greatest acts of heroism in the history of the Navy.
67 posted on 11/28/2005 10:12:59 AM PST by colorado tanker (I can't comment on things that might come before the Court, but I can tell you my Pinochle strategy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Bender2
In the end, all the Japanese effort and expense of building the Yamato was for naught. American Airpower sunk it as another payment for Pearl Harbor.

But the IJN couldn't know that until it was too late.

Planning for the Yamato class battleships began as far back as the 1920's - even though they knew it would bust the limits imposed on Japan by the Washington Naval Treaty. Yamato and Musashi were both laid down well before Pearl Harbor. Yamato, in fact, was offficially commissioned just a couple weeks after Pearl.

At the time they were laid down, they seemed to make sense as the solution to the problem of Japanese naval inferiority: They could not build as many ships as Britain or America. But they could build them bigger, and make up in quality what they lacked in quantity. And in the 1930's, advocates for naval air power hadn't won the argument in any naval service of note. Yet.

After Taranto, Pearl Harbor and the sinking of the Repulse and Prince of Wales, it had become obvious to many in the IJN that carriers, not battleships were the way to go - and after Midway, the need became urgent. Yamato and Musashi were already built, so nothing could be done about that. But Shinano was still early enough along that it could be converted to a carrier.

Even so I grant that IJN thinking on naval airpower, ironically (in view of their enormous success with carrier power in the first six months of WWII), was still a little behind the US Navy, which made virtue of necessity after losing all its battlewagons. But if Japan gets nicked for finishing off its obsolete superbattleships, you have to also wonder why the US Navy insisted on building so many new battleships of the South Dakota and Iowa classes - rather than more carriers.

Of course, we DID have the industrial capacity and to spare such that it probably didn't make much difference...

68 posted on 11/28/2005 10:52:21 AM PST by The Iguana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: 75thOVI
"'Sides as a former submariner, I think all that "Going on top of water", is unnatcheral anyway."

Ditto. USS Jallao, SS-368

69 posted on 11/28/2005 11:02:11 AM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: The Iguana
"you have to also wonder why the US Navy insisted on building so many new battleships of the South Dakota and Iowa classes - rather than more carriers."

The US had over 100 carriers in the Pacific at the end of WW2, albeit, most were the 'baby' or escort carrier class.

70 posted on 11/28/2005 11:05:53 AM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: blam

I thought the Yamato was destroyed by a warp core breach when a computer defect shut down the containment fields?

Oh. Wrong Yamato.


71 posted on 11/28/2005 11:07:27 AM PST by BigCinBigD (Merry Christmas!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Politics aside, the greatest heroism is most often displayed in defeat. The Japanese were great individual soldiers and sailors. To denigrate them because of the bad policies by their leaders only diminishes the sacrifices and accomplishments of those who fought, suffered and died defeating them.
72 posted on 11/28/2005 11:07:31 AM PST by Natural Law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

It almost looks like a small nuke wnt off, great picture.


73 posted on 11/28/2005 11:17:50 AM PST by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: yarddog
**I think the Yamato took 19 torpedoes if my memory is right plus a lot of bombs.**

It took 20 torpedos, and seventeen Direct Bomb Hits to sink her, and that's only because of a magazine explosion...

Unlike Musashi, she had a Captain and Officers that did not believe that Damage Control Training was an admission of failure. USS Tunny put 3 torpedos in her in April 44, and taught the crew a valuable lesson about surviving hits...
74 posted on 11/28/2005 11:18:49 AM PST by tcrlaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Hexenhammer

75 posted on 11/28/2005 11:22:05 AM PST by bmwcyle (Evolution is a myth -- Libertarians just won't evolve into Conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: 91B

***Do not forget to give some credit to the suicidally brave task force of destroyer escorts and escort carriers that put up so much of a fight***

TAFFY3 Destroyers were identified as Cruisers when they were first seen, which led to a lot of confusion for the Japanese. Again, the lack of Air Intelligence hurt the Japanese just when they needed it most.

Halsey was "Carrier Nuts" and the Japanese plan to draw the heavy units North had worked PERFECTLY. It was only Toyoda's timidity (uncharacteristicly for him) that saved the day for the Americans...


76 posted on 11/28/2005 11:28:54 AM PST by tcrlaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

I think an Iowa class would do fine in a battle with a Yamato class. Yamato was just heavier not better.


77 posted on 11/28/2005 11:39:02 AM PST by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: The Iguana
Ah, but the US did cancel the "USS Montana" class before the first keel was laid down. As designed and proposed in 1940, it would have had 12 instead of 9 16" rifles as on the "USS Iowa" class BBs. Thus even the Battleship Navy realized that Billy Mitchell was right after all (1943).
78 posted on 11/28/2005 4:12:03 PM PST by SES1066 (Cycling to conserve, Conservative to save, Saving to Retire, will Retire to Cycle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Temple Owl
They probably had a good time raping Korean "Comfort Girls" before getting nailed by the United States Navy.

Unlikely. Keep in mind that the Japanese Army and the IJN were two very different organizations. The Navy opposed the war, while the Army was having a horrific good old time of it in Manchuko at the time. The IJN was a much more professional organization.

79 posted on 11/28/2005 4:17:58 PM PST by HolgerDansk ("Oh Bother", said Pooh, as he worked the bolt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: The Iguana
Re: "...you have to also wonder why the US Navy insisted on building so many new battleships of the South Dakota and Iowa classes - rather than more carriers. "

The fast battleships of the Iowa Class offered large AA platforms that could keep up with and protect our carriers. Plus they and their older cousins provided fire support for the many beachheads we stormed against the Japanese and the future North Koreans and Iraqis.

True, the IJN building of super battleships like the Yamato were correct in their 1920ish treaty eyes until events showed them how the carrier was the wave of the future. However, it was the lack of well trained pilots that doomed Japan rather than lack of planes or carriers... Or more super battleships.

Remember, it was Admiral Ozawa's near pilot-less carriers that were the decoys to pull Halsey and his Third Fleet away from San Bernardino and guarding the Leyte Gulf beachhead that allowed the Yamato lead force to come into the gulf to attack...

BTW we Armchair Admirals could win any war given enough beer, chips, dip and cigarettes, eh?

80 posted on 11/28/2005 5:28:13 PM PST by Bender2 (Even dirty old robots need love!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson