Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Saddam Planned Pre-war Attacks on U.S.!!!
The Washington Post ^ | June 19, 2004 | Walter Pincus

Posted on 11/27/2005 1:47:48 PM PST by redvers llewellyn

WHY HAS THIS DAMNING REVELATION BEEN FORGOTTEN? _________________________________________________________

Russia Warned U.S. About Iraq, Putin Says

By Walter Pincus Washington Post Staff Writer Saturday, June 19, 2004; Page A11

Russian President Vladimir Putin said yesterday that his intelligence service had warned the Bush administration before the U.S. invasion of Iraq that Saddam Hussein's government was planning attacks against U.S. targets both inside and outside the country.

Putin, who opposed Bush's decision to go to war in Iraq, did not go into detail about the information that was forwarded, and said Russia had no evidence that Hussein was involved in any attacks.

"After Sept. 11, 2001, and before the start of the military operation in Iraq, the Russian special services, the intelligence service, received information that officials from Saddam's regime were preparing terrorist attacks in the United States and outside it against the U.S. military and other interests," Putin said, according to RIA Novosti, the Russian news agency. "American President George Bush had an opportunity to personally thank the head of one of the Russian special services for this information, which he regarded as very important," the Russian president told an interviewer while in Astana, capital of Kazakhstan.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: alqaedaandiraq; cialeak; iraq; jihadinamerica; johndoe2; okcbombing; pincus; prequel; putin; saddam
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 last
To: redvers llewellyn

bttt


41 posted on 11/27/2005 2:46:50 PM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redvers llewellyn

What??

This should be front page news somewhere. Anywhere!


42 posted on 11/27/2005 2:47:15 PM PST by pollyannaish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pollyannaish
Oops. Note to self: Remember to at least GLANCE at the date.

Sheesh.
43 posted on 11/27/2005 2:48:13 PM PST by pollyannaish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: redvers llewellyn

It has been an incredible failure of this administration to effectively make the case for doing the right thing. The case has been there.


44 posted on 11/27/2005 2:48:47 PM PST by doug from upland (The troops will come home when the mission is complete)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redvers llewellyn
The major media barely mentioned it. Hmm, I wonder why.

Bottom line folks ... if the Bushies can't get this sort of info out they aren't playing in the big league. There are ways to circumvent the liberal mainstream media ... if this report is true.

45 posted on 11/27/2005 2:51:06 PM PST by BluH2o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redvers llewellyn

Bump, BTTT, means to reply to a thread for the purpose of keeping it current on the screen. This works for only a very short time since everything scrolls by rapidly.


46 posted on 11/27/2005 2:55:27 PM PST by RightWhale (Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
"Bump, BTTT, means to reply to a thread for the purpose of keeping it current on the screen. This works for only a very short time since everything scrolls by rapidly."

I've always wondered about that. Does something remain at the top of the queue simply because it gets a lot of hits? It's never seemed that way to me. It seems that topics move down the list as they are supplanted by new posts, and that this has nothing to do with how many hits a post receives.
47 posted on 11/27/2005 3:03:19 PM PST by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Steve_Seattle

It seems pointless to bump since the volume of traffic is so large. It might be a way of bookmarking a thread for oneself, or just saying 'hey'. The ping is more useful since a group with known or suspected interests can be called to a thread long after it has scrolled into the bit bucket.


48 posted on 11/27/2005 3:09:08 PM PST by RightWhale (Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: redvers llewellyn
<<>> Because it was buried on Page 11.... Page 1 would have cut the MooreOns off at the knees in an election summer, and that would have cost a LOT of people a BUNCH of money and ratings.... And you KNOW we can't have THAT! It's why they had the fake "Race" with Edwards, Sharpton and Kerry "Debating" all the time...
49 posted on 11/27/2005 3:20:07 PM PST by tcrlaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rocko
WHY HAS THIS DAMNING REVELATION BEEN FORGOTTEN? Because the Dims threw it down the Memory Hole.

1984 Again

50 posted on 11/27/2005 4:53:21 PM PST by p23185 (Why isn't attempting to take down a sitting Pres & his Admin considered Sedition?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: redvers llewellyn

Oh but see, he hadn't actually done anything yet! We should have waited until he killed a few thousand Americans and then made sure he had a fair trial with a good defense attorney! /sarcasm


51 posted on 11/27/2005 4:55:06 PM PST by ladyinred (RIP dear Texas Cowboy, you will be missed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WalterSkinner
"This shouldn't be a surprise. BTW it took 60 years to find out that Hitler had planned attacks against New York."

Exactly! All this should be brought out in Saddam trail. I suppose Putin was going to warn us ...(not!)

52 posted on 11/28/2005 2:30:33 AM PST by M. Espinola (Freedom is never free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Archangelsk

Yep, there is the issue of how reliable Putin is. The Left used that argument when this story first came out.


53 posted on 11/28/2005 8:12:38 AM PST by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: popdonnelly
So, you trust an ex-KGB Colonel, hmmm. Thanks for the input Gospodin Tovarisch.
54 posted on 11/28/2005 9:21:56 AM PST by Archangelsk (Handbasket, hell. Get used to the concept.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: redvers llewellyn
Consider bump a complement.

What it means is that I am trying to keep the story near the top as it is important.

I also gave it a bump for a selfish reason, I wanted to have a post of mine own on this thread so that I could easily come back to this article in the future.

People bump an article to keep it up top in the current postings for other people to see and post on.

People also bump an article for self reference so that they can log into their own account look at their postings and rereference the article.

55 posted on 12/01/2005 8:25:33 PM PST by Freedom of Speech Wins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson