Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Revolutionary Channels His Inner Michael Moore
New York Times ^ | November 26, 2005 | NAZILA FATHI

Posted on 11/26/2005 3:32:41 AM PST by infocats

TEHRAN

For years, Massoud Dehnamaki was known widely as the feared enforcer of conservative rules that restricted freedom for women and society.

In recent years, however, he has emerged as Iran's Michael Moore, having directed a documentary on the taboo issue of prostitution and another forthcoming film on soccer as a metaphor of political struggle.

Reformists and conservatives alike harshly criticized Mr. Dehnamaki for making the first movie, "Poverty and Prostitution." Conservatives were furious that one of their own had not only highlighted an un-Islamic social pathology but seemed to sympathize with the prostitutes. Reformists believed he deliberately exaggerated the problem to make a case against easing Islamic law.

In an interview in his basement office in downtown Tehran, Mr. Dehnamaki said both camps had gotten it wrong, and denied that his views had undergone a radical transformation.

"I was always concerned about justice in society," he said. "There was a time that I believed that the people were the problem. But that was a mistake. The real problems are our rulers, who have become used to corruption and cannot fulfill the promises of the early days of the revolution about social justice and equality."

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: americans4afreeiran; deadmullahsstink; freeirannow; freeirantoday; usa4afreeiran

1 posted on 11/26/2005 3:32:42 AM PST by infocats
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: infocats

2 posted on 11/26/2005 3:34:55 AM PST by ChadGore (VISUALIZE 62,041,268 Bush fans.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: infocats
For years, Massoud Dehnamaki was known widely as the feared enforcer of conservative rules that restricted freedom for women and society.

Had to barf here. Conservatism doesn't involve the enslavement, tyrannical or abusive treatment of any individual. That would be extremism, as in the extreme left.

Conservatism would be the opposite, a balanced perspective that barely deviates from the stated intent or platform. Think "Obeying the Constitution as it was written" - That would be conservatism.

3 posted on 11/26/2005 3:42:25 AM PST by Caipirabob (Democrats.. Socialists..Commies..Traitors...Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: infocats

Oh goody!

Just what the world needs. ANOTHER Michael Moore!/sarc




4 posted on 11/26/2005 3:43:04 AM PST by Bigh4u2 (Denial is the first requirement to be a liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: infocats

This guy is going to wake up dead one morning.


5 posted on 11/26/2005 3:49:55 AM PST by stm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stm

Which guy? You mean the author of the piece? This is not in the same vein as M Moore. His work is predicated upon distortion and conceit. He does not expose the inner corruption of social systems. Moore exemplifies the inner corruption in our society.


6 posted on 11/26/2005 5:14:41 AM PST by Louis Foxwell (THIS IS WAR AND I MEAN TO WIN IT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson