Posted on 11/25/2005 5:21:54 PM PST by ncountylee
Edited on 11/25/2005 5:34:30 PM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]
Can not post any text from this source
46 in Rasmussen
I'm certain that Bush has no chance of being re-elected in 2008.
Delusional Democrats (but I repeat myself) can't seem to get it through their brick heads that George Bush is NOT RUNNING IN 2008 AND DOESN'T HAVE TO GIVE TWO SQUATS ABOUT WHAT POLLS SAY!
That's right, 46% in Rasmussen but the MSM does not want to mention that. They only quote the highly partisan AP, Newsweekk, CNN, etc. the usual suspects
This probably means that George Bush can't run for re-election and win. Maybe George McGovern still has a chance.
When is the MSM going to realize that Bush doesn't give a feces about polls?? These people are so delusional that they're probably smoking crack and injecting heroin simultaneously.
We all need to keep in mind. The reason Mr. Bush has been so carefull, not going into Iran, is because the Dems will try to impeach. That is expected as they are traitors to the Republic.
The key here is the damn gutless, clubby, approval from their peers RINO's.
They are the reason we cannot be more forcefull in Iraq and why We tip toe around the murder gang that is the ROP.
McCain being the ringleader, he likes being a spoiler.
Our worst enemy is our own team, nothing is worse then someone who says they are your friend then stabs you in the back
History shows that every President since Kennedy has had poll numbers below 40%. (And for JFK and earlier, polls were far less frequently taken and hardly comparable.)
Good reasoning about the democrats and MSM wanting to impeach. Clinton would also benefit.
These people have no clue! As far as I know Bush can't run again.
They've been quoting polls about Bush going "so low" for almost two months now yet we're still in Iraq, he's still signing bills into law, he's still flying around on Air Force One, he's still leading the world, and if you ask a legitimate poll of the american people who they want to lead them, Bush or Kerry? You would find out that Bush wins handily.
In fact, if I remember correctly, there was a poll on this about 12 months ago...can anyone confirm this? I think it was called "Election Day" or something really jazzy like that. I could be wrong.
Those nasty 'RATS and their "polls."
I thought I'd read that both Clinton and Reagan had polls lower than Bush's worst showing at one point or another.
These are very challenging times, and President Bush is destined to have quite a legacy, unlike his predecessor. I think that's what has the libs little panties in a bunch.
Other than that, polls, schmolls, they mean NOTHING.
By the way.
How many more times do I have to hear 'unexpected' and 'surprising' being used as adjectives by pundits and anchors on election night when they describe GOP victories?
TO ALL MY FELLOW FREEPERS: Please remember that ALL presidents, even 2nd-termers, run for re-election in that they will try their best to have a member of their party elected as their successor. Thus, Bush is "running for a 3rd term" in the form of whichever GOP candidate gets the nomination. If W leaves office under a cloud of negative poll #'s or some pseudo-scandal cooked up by the Commie media, it will hurt the GOP candidate's attempt to defeat the Commucratic candidate in 2008.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.