1 posted on
11/25/2005 10:02:03 AM PST by
BenLurkin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
To: BenLurkin
Boy, you could gut (maybe skin, too!) your deer with one shot!
2 posted on
11/25/2005 10:04:11 AM PST by
DTogo
(I haven't left the GOP, the GOP left me.)
To: BenLurkin
When U.S. soldiers need to penetrate a tank's armor from a mile away, they count on a weapon that evolved from the garage tinkering of a former wedding photographer.Bullsh*t! A 50 cal is as useless against a tank a 100 yards as a spitwad, much less a mile.
3 posted on
11/25/2005 10:07:31 AM PST by
Blood of Tyrants
(G-d is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
To: BenLurkin
"I don't understand what good a .50-caliber is going to do you," King said. "I don't understand any civilian use of it. The only thing it's good for is for military or police application. You can't really hunt with it because it would destroy most of the meat."
It's obvious not only do you not understand what good a .50 cal is, but you don't understand the Constitution either! The 2nd amendment has nothing to do with HUNTING...try reading it sometime.
To: BenLurkin
The guns are used by most civilians for hunting big game Nonsense.
Wish I could afford one !
5 posted on
11/25/2005 10:07:47 AM PST by
1066AD
To: BenLurkin
But the powerful gun has drawn plenty of critics, who say the rifle could be used by terrorists to bring down commercial airliners as can a Canadian goose.time to ban them.
6 posted on
11/25/2005 10:08:44 AM PST by
Rakkasan1
(Peace de Resistance! Viva la Paper towels!)
To: BenLurkin
"They're (.50 caliber) easier to buy than a handgun," Diaz said.Yeah, 5ft+ long, and cost more than 3k. Much easier to buy & conceal, too. What an idiot.
10 posted on
11/25/2005 10:10:48 AM PST by
Puppage
(You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
To: BenLurkin
Hollywood eh? isn't this the gun that Arnold banned?
11 posted on
11/25/2005 10:11:32 AM PST by
Awestruck
(All the usual suspects)
To: BenLurkin
Joseph King, a terrorism expert at the John Jay College of Criminal Justice in New York, said terrorists could use the weapon to take out a plane. So, in effect, what he's saying is a .50 cal is as lethal as some boxcutters?
12 posted on
11/25/2005 10:13:19 AM PST by
Triggerhippie
(Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose.)
To: BenLurkin
You can't really hunt with it because it would destroy most of the meat."Obviously you can't shoot straight.
14 posted on
11/25/2005 10:15:41 AM PST by
SouthTexas
(What part of NO don't you understand?)
To: BenLurkin
The New York City Police Department recently announced it's training officers in its aviation unit to use the rifles, which will be on board some of the department's helicopters to intercept potential attacks from boats or airplanes That ought to be funny to watch. Who develops their tactics, Jean Claude Van Damme or Sylvester Stallone?
15 posted on
11/25/2005 10:15:43 AM PST by
USNBandit
(sarcasm engaged at all times)
To: BenLurkin
How does one avaoid breaking or dislocating one's shoulder when firing this thing?
17 posted on
11/25/2005 10:19:21 AM PST by
AEMILIUS PAULUS
(It is a shame that when these people give a riot)
To: BenLurkin
...critics, who say the rifle could be used by terrorists to bring down commercial airliners It's obvious that these critics do not have any understanding about the resolving of the target solution in an air defense problem. IOW's, when the bullet gets to where the the aircraft was when the shooter shot, the aircraft will not be there. The aircraft has moved on, unharmed and will continue to do so.
18 posted on
11/25/2005 10:19:57 AM PST by
elbucko
To: BenLurkin
When U.S. soldiers need to penetrate a tank's armor from a mile away,[...]
Clueless idiot.
23 posted on
11/25/2005 10:26:15 AM PST by
Riley
("Bother" said Pooh, as he fired the Claymores.)
To: BenLurkin
has drawn a customer base of gun enthusiasts, Hollywood actors This surely must be a typo...
24 posted on
11/25/2005 10:27:21 AM PST by
CommandoFrank
(Peer into the depths of hell and there you will find the face of Islam...)
To: BenLurkin
"made their way to terrorists, drug cartels and survivalists."
Equating "survivalist" with terrorist and drug cartels!
I'm surprised they forgot to throw in "Militia's".
For the record, "Survivalist" and legitimate "Militia" are honorable and necessary components of the U.S. citizenry.
This supposed article seems very familiar, I think it's mostly written by the anti's, and regurgitated every few month's.
25 posted on
11/25/2005 10:30:24 AM PST by
Richard-SIA
("The natural progress of things is for government to gain ground and for liberty to yield" JEFFERSON)
To: BenLurkin
Well, of course the stars buy them. They're elite and therefore exempt from the laws they prescribe for everyone else. Duh!
To: BenLurkin
MURFREESBORO, Tenn. (AP) -- When U.S. soldiers need to penetrate a tank's armor from a mile away, they count on a weapon that evolved from the garage tinkering of a former wedding photographer.Utter BS!!!
38 posted on
11/25/2005 10:48:43 AM PST by
Paul_Denton
(The U.S. should adopt the policy of Oom Shmoom: Israeli policy where no one gives a sh*t about U.N.)
To: BenLurkin
"I don't understand what good a .50-caliber is going to do you," King said. "I don't understand any civilian use of it. The only thing it's good for is for military or police application. You can't really hunt with it because it would destroy most of the meat."Obvious the he never heard of the second amendment.
39 posted on
11/25/2005 10:51:46 AM PST by
Paul_Denton
(The U.S. should adopt the policy of Oom Shmoom: Israeli policy where no one gives a sh*t about U.N.)
To: BenLurkin
It would be fascinating to see a first draft of this story before the editors got hold of it. Somehow, I suspect this started out as a profile of Barrett and his rifles, but became aa bigger anti-gun screed with each revision.
To: BenLurkin
Utter stupidity.
"Joseph King, a terrorism expert at the John Jay College of Criminal Justice in New York, said terrorists could use the weapon to take out a plane."
Really...they why did the P-51 and F-86 have 6 .50 BMG guns and the P-47 8 if all you needed was one round?
Earlier in the article we had:
"But the powerful gun has drawn plenty of critics, who say the rifle could be used by terrorists to bring down commercial airliners or penetrate rail cars and storage plants holding hazardous materials."
A few years back a rather tipsy individual shot a hole in the trans Alaska pipeline with a plain old .338. Any of the big game rounds (.375 .458 not to mention the Weatherby speedsters such as the .378 and .460) This is just another anti-gun lunatic fringe group out to ban all guns a little at a time.
43 posted on
11/25/2005 10:59:01 AM PST by
SeaWolf
(Orwell must have foreseen the 21st Century Democratic Party when he wrote 1984)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson