Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/24/2005 9:10:27 PM PST by ncountylee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: ncountylee
“You are not a predator to anyone except your family.”

That's okay then.

2 posted on 11/24/2005 9:13:09 PM PST by Restorer (Illegitimati non carborundum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ncountylee
A 10-year suspended sentence?

Justice would require 10 years in the electric chair.

3 posted on 11/24/2005 9:13:56 PM PST by SmithL (There are a lot of people that hate Bush more than they hate terrorists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ncountylee

This guy should be beaten till there's nothing left but a bloody mess!!!!


4 posted on 11/24/2005 9:15:47 PM PST by blastdad51 (Proud father of an Enduring Freedom vet, and friend of a soldier lost in Afghanistan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ncountylee

“I'm deeply sorry,” he said then started crying. “This should have never happened.”

Yuh. Now prison gang rape SHOULD happen.


5 posted on 11/24/2005 9:17:42 PM PST by WorkingClassFilth (The problem with being a 'big tent' Party is that the clowns are seated with the paying customers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ncountylee

I heard a replay of a Bill O'Reilly interview with a spokesman of
The National Association To Protect Children.
It was shocking to hear him say that something like 37 states have
legal loopholes that allow sex offenders to recover custody/conact
even with the children they molest in their own family.

Even more shocking was to hear about how much opposition the organization
has encountered in trying to rectify this gap in the law.
I guess the "revolving door" is just too lucrative to the legal system
and there's a lot of DANGEROUS thought in "child protective" circles
about how to treat these cases.

http://www.protect.org/


6 posted on 11/24/2005 9:24:00 PM PST by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ncountylee

I have zero sympathy for the sex offender.
I bet will see his name again in the news.
Next time, I doubt he will get a suspended
sentence.


8 posted on 11/24/2005 9:51:06 PM PST by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ncountylee

What happened to the poor girl?

This is disgusting and vile. He should face execution, not a suspended sentence.


11 posted on 11/24/2005 10:04:52 PM PST by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ncountylee

The predators get a good deal because the victims don't want the humiliation of testifying in court. I think it it terrible but it happens often.

A parent is the very worst sexual pervert..They hold a position of trust and protection of the child..May he burn in hell.


14 posted on 11/24/2005 10:38:13 PM PST by MEG33 (GOD BLESS OUR ARMED FORCES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ncountylee
>“You had inappropriate sexual contact with a child beginning at age six and continuing until her teenage years,” Langton said.

“I think this is a lenient sentence, not a typical case,” Langton said. “You are not a predator to anyone except your family.”

The judge almost comes off as sounding envious.

15 posted on 11/25/2005 12:15:09 AM PST by ApplegateRanch (Islam: a Satanically Transmitted Disease, spread by unprotected intimate contact with the Koranus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ncountylee

Suspended sentence? What the f... kind of justice is that?


18 posted on 11/25/2005 8:00:21 PM PST by darkangel82
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson