Skip to comments.
Al-Zarqawi Likely Alive, Commander Says
AP/ABCnews ^
| Nov/22/05
| LOLITA C. BALDOR Associated Press Writer
Posted on 11/22/2005 10:24:06 AM PST by jveritas
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
Too much confusion. I greatly hope(d) that we got the evil bustard.
1
posted on
11/22/2005 10:24:06 AM PST
by
jveritas
To: jveritas
Experts agree, Abu Musab al-Zarqawi is either alive or dead.
2
posted on
11/22/2005 10:25:27 AM PST
by
Phantom Lord
(Fall on to your knees for the Phantom Lord)
To: jveritas
If he is alive, may he live in great pain and fear.
3
posted on
11/22/2005 10:26:22 AM PST
by
msnimje
(Bob Woodward is the Grinch who stole Fitzmas.....................................................)
To: jveritas
Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, may pork fat be upon him, if still alive can number his remaining days.
4
posted on
11/22/2005 10:31:05 AM PST
by
clee1
(We use 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 2 to pull a trigger. I'm lazy and I'm tired of smiling.)
To: jveritas
But, consenus was achieved that Mao Tse Tung is indeed, still dead.
Gotta get this guy while he's under the gun!
5
posted on
11/22/2005 10:31:09 AM PST
by
wvobiwan
(It's OUR Net! If you don't like it keep your stanky routers off it!)
To: Phantom Lord
Well, finally the experts can agree on something!
6
posted on
11/22/2005 10:31:51 AM PST
by
mlc9852
To: jveritas
Personally, I would like to see sweet justice served in the form of a U.S. soldier sawing off the bastard's head with a rusty machete.
But that's just me.
7
posted on
11/22/2005 10:33:36 AM PST
by
reagan_fanatic
(Darwinism is a belief in the meaninglessness of existence - R. Kirk)
To: jveritas
"A top U.S. commander in Iraq said Tuesday he has "absolutely no reason" to believe the leader of al-Qaida in Iraq, Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, died "
"Absolutely no reason" is a stretch imo.
We have a least a little reason.
A well guarded AQ safe house (well guared for some reason), 3 suicide bombers blew themselves up rather than be captured..just as Z is known to have planned in such an event. and he is known to wear a suicide belt.
Whether its him or not the DNA test should reveal, but it looks like at least a possibility to me.
US officials would want to play down the chance knowing that if it wasnt Z the media would use it to beat Bush over the head with it as a "failure."
To: Phantom Lord
Experts agree, Abu Musab al-Zarqawi is either alive or dead.LOL...think it's strange we've not heard anything from this scumbag. It was said we'd be hearing from him if he WASN'T DEAD.
9
posted on
11/22/2005 10:38:38 AM PST
by
shield
(The Greatest Scientific Discoveries of the Century Reveal God!!!! by Dr. H. Ross, Astrophysicist)
To: No Blue States
10
posted on
11/22/2005 10:43:16 AM PST
by
InsureAmerica
(Evil? I have many words for it. We are as dust, to them. - v v putin)
To: No Blue States
Yeah we've heard enough about his "Top Lieutenants" that have assumed room temperature.
I don't know what his organizational structure looks like, but it seems to be Zarq over about 75 top lieutenants, who in turn, are over the masses of cannon fodder.
Every now & then we snag a top lieutenant. I can't wait for the head dung ball to take the big dirt nap.
11
posted on
11/22/2005 10:44:42 AM PST
by
Sax
To: shield
I don't know about that. There were a couple of times Bin Laden "died" that it took a few days to hear from him again.
Here's to hoping he's saying "hi" to Hitler in Hell for us, though.
12
posted on
11/22/2005 10:47:08 AM PST
by
ark_girl
To: jveritas
I've read several reports about this raid, but there are never any comments about intel retrieved. Were any documents or computers etc in that house? If any of those who wore the belts
were higher-ups, there should be a wealth of info. Inquiring minds want to know.
Nam Vet
13
posted on
11/22/2005 10:50:05 AM PST
by
Nam Vet
(The Gaulistinians are rioting to reclaim the ancient 'holy ground' of Paris.)
To: InsureAmerica; Sax
In another version of Gen Vines comments he admits it is a
possibility: ""... It is possible, but I have no reason to believe it."
http://www.theadvertiser.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5936,17338399%255E1702,00.html
That beats a confirmed negative.
To: Nam Vet
Ive wondered the same thing. What intel did we gather there and why isnt it mentioned like in past articles.
To: Nam Vet
Things are too hush-hush.
I like this.
To: ark_girl
17
posted on
11/22/2005 10:53:00 AM PST
by
ASA Vet
(Those who know don't talk, those who talk don't know.)
To: Nam Vet
but there are never any comments about intel retrievedWhat??? FreeRepublic isn't on the distribution list for classified material?
18
posted on
11/22/2005 10:54:45 AM PST
by
ASA Vet
(Those who know don't talk, those who talk don't know.)
To: jveritas
How long does a DNA test take?
19
posted on
11/22/2005 10:56:45 AM PST
by
Aquinasfan
(Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
To: jveritas
20
posted on
11/22/2005 10:58:25 AM PST
by
BeHoldAPaleHorse
(MORE COWBELL! MORE COWBELL! (CLANK-CLANK-CLANK))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
