Posted on 11/22/2005 7:33:07 AM PST by newgeezer
|
"If they want to convict her, they'll need some evidence that she conspired with him before the fact."
I posted that point earlier.
" I'm guessing that they'll find that evidence in her emails."
I believe you are right.
I went to that website that they frequented before it was 'locked down'.
Didn't see anything that could have been used against them there tho.
The e-mails and possibly phone records (text messaging) would the proof they need.
Unless, of course, there is a confession by her.
I believe in the former case, the girl got off with a "slap on the wrist", and actually married the son of the prosecutor...
It was the basis of the Terrence Malick film "Badlands"...
- John
If they were meeting in secret, the father wasn't watching closely enough.
In case anyone hasn't noticed, among all the other calamities we are experiencing in the "Age of Feminized Man," young girls from supposedly good families are disappearing all around us and turning up as ground beef or not turning up at all. We fathers cannot let our daughters run wild out on the streets without risking disaster for them, for our own families and for the communities we live in.
In the name of feminine "equality" (whatever that means), we men are permitting our entire civilization to be reduced to an episode from "Girls Gone Wild," with naked girls passing out free sex, and young men correspondingly unable to control themselves.
This is having catastrophic consequences everywhere.
DA740
I heard on the local news here that in PA, to get a death penalty, a murder charge must be accompanied by another felony charge which kidnapping is. I'm not a lawyer and this didn't make sense to me, but that seems to have been the reason that whether or not the kidnapping charge stuck was so important.
Whether it comes to play in the trial or not (and I suspect you're right), the media will play it up as much as possible.
"If they were meeting in secret, the father wasn't watching closely enough."
So what was her father supposed to do? Follow her everywhere she went? Or maybe just assume that she is lying, no matter what she says?
I think having a little faith in your children is also necessary. You can't just assume everything a kid says is a lie.
There may have never been a reason to believe she was lying.
Especially if she seemed to be the 'model' daughter.
I'm sorry, but I never chased my daughters around everywhere they went, but I did check to make sure that they were where they were supposed to be if they said they were going to be on a 'sleep over'.
But, that being said, I didn't call in the middle of the night to see if her 'friend' let her sneak out in the middle of the night either.
It's called 'trust'. And until they violate that trust, there is no reason to be a 'paranoid' parent.
I read some of the blogs and something was definitely up. But I didn't infer murder. I thought it sounded more like she may have been pregnant. I wonder whether she got an abortion. Or whether she could be pregnant now. That could be the reason why she still wanted to marry him.
Two counts of murder may be enough for the death penalty.
I loved my parents with my whole heart and soul and wish they could still be here. I cannot even fathom how this could be done. It's tragic.
You might be right about that. He does seem to be cooperating, though. I figure if he'll get life.
This is beyond my imagination, too. However, I still don't assume that Kara is guilty because she left with him. I just don't know all the facts and I don't know her. She could have been, but I guess it's easier for me to see her ran away with her lover than actively plan her parents' murder. I'm sure that LE is carefully putting their case together. We'll see soon enough.
Unless I'm mistaken, there's no mention of it in this article. ;^)
There's plenty of time yet...
Maybe you should call the MSM and remind them that they haven't honed in on the home-schooling aspect enough.
I'm sure that they don't need my help:)
The problem is that responsibility-avoidance has risen to an art form.
If a man's 14 year old girl was able to do the things this girl did, that man is responsible. If you let your 14 year old girl get out of hand, that's your fault.
Granted we now live in a situation where we men have ostensibly relegated the responsibility for raising children partly to big brother (Social Services, meaning NO responsibility), and so when a man takes action to prevent his children from getting out of hand, he risks facing the idiotic creature of his own creation, Social Services, to step in and prevent him from doing so. Result: Little Debbie does Dallas.
What we men have done is idiotic in the extreme.
DA740
What if she willingly went to a bank and signed a contract to buy a house? Would it be legal? No. Why? Because we say that 14 year-olds aren't mature enough to make those decisions, willing or not.
Sure there is. I can only imagine this could make for quite a TV-movie event, a real 'Look at the religious weirdos!' sort of thing.
On the other hand, what I recall of the Elizabeth Smart movie seemed tasteful. Maybe that's because I saw only some 'authorized' version. Or, maybe it's because I'm not a Mormon.
At any rate, I'm sure we'll get a chance to see whether Hollywood decides to handle these evangelical Christians with more than their usual level of class.
Don't you think it was the boy, the murderer, who was slightly more out of hand here than the girl? Maybe his parents should have kept him locked in the house. Would have solved the problem right there.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.