Terrorists Possess Multimillion Dollar Intelligence Network (MSM is their fifth column.)

CBS News reports that "as the US military death toll continues to rise, officials have determined that the insurgents are utilizing media reports to outsmart armed forces."

Perhaps that's overstating the problem. I won't denigrate our military by alleging the insurgents are outsmarting our military, but I will admit that it seems as if the insurgents in Iraq and the terrorists across the globe are outsmarting the news media and their comrades on the left. These members of the elite, who suffer from the delusion that they're the smartest people in the room, are not difficult to outsmart by their own admission.

The media template for President George Bush and for conservatives in general is that we're not too swift when it comes to intelligence. However, that assessment may more closely define the left in the Democrat Party and the news media than it does the unwashed masses and their president.

The media template provides as a given that George W. Bush is inarticulate and not very bright. Okay, for the sake of argument I'll give them that. But how do they explain how Bush could: (1) Steal two elections; (2) Con them into voting for the Iraq War that they're against; (3) Get reelected against a supposedly intellectually superior opponent -- well, that was before we found out Kerry was really a dunce in college.

So the Democrats, who can't hold on to an election they claim is theirs and can be easily manipulated to vote for a war they oppose want us to give them a shot at controlling the House of Representatives, the Senate and the White House? Really? A bunch of intellectual geniuses who can be duped by a Texas dunderhead think they're worthy of ruling the country with their neo-Marxist supporters? I don't think so.

The GOP may be wanting in many areas, but they are still far superior than the whining, wash-women who can't even hold on to an election in spite of advantages such as having dead folks vote and MTV urging kids to vote left because it's cool to be a lefty. Plus the members of the news media who perform lap dances for the likes of Bill and Hillary Clinton and others in the Democrat Party made certain to attempt hurting Bush with forged documents and hearsay. Add the whole entertainment media, the magazine industry including even TV Guide and it's a miracle that John Kerry lost to the mentally challenged George Bush. Not only that, but Bush also outsmarted them by not leaving a trail to prove he stole the second election.

So now CBS News reports that the terrorists and insurgents are outsmarting the US troops. Remember, the denizens of America's newsrooms believe they're the brightest bulbs in the stadium. So our dumb troops are being outsmarted by Muslim radicals who still live in the 12th Century.

Not so. Actually, it is the news media who are being outsmarted. They are saving the international terrorist network tons of money. The terrorists do not need an intelligence network to help their operations -- they have the Democrats, some Republicans and the news media working in lockstep to provide them with a well-oiled intelligence asset. Not only that, but unlike the US intelligence community, the terrorists' intelligence network includes commercials so they can take a bathroom break, refill their glasses with goat's milk, or simply sit back and watch a Victoria's Secret commercial as they daydream about those 72 virgins all looking like Tyra Banks.

A terrorist with access to Google, Yahoo, the New York Times, the Washington Post, CNN, CBS, ABC, NBC, etc., makes for a formidable spy since he can find out about strategic and tactical intelligence. He can find out about secret CIA prisons. Or find out about what interrogators can and cannot do to obtain information from captured terrorists. The news media and Democrats provide the terrorists and insurgents with talking points, as well. Examples abound. For instance, Senator Dick Durbin on the floor of the US Senate comparing US soldiers to Hitler's stormtroopers, US detention facilities to gulags and US operations to the killing fields of Cambodia's mass murderer Pol Pot. Another example is Newsweek regurgitating jailhouse gossip that a US soldier flushed a Koran down the toilet in the Gitmo prison. Hell, besides being an intelligence network for the Islamofascists, they're also the recruiting arm of Al-Qaeda.

Senator Jay Rockefeller, ranking Democrat for the Senate Intelligence Committee, actually admitted he's an intelligence operative for radical Islamic terrorists and state-sponsors of terrorism. By his own admission, prior to the invasion of Iraq, he flew to the Middle East and met with heads of state from Syria, a nation on the US list of sponsors of terrorism, and Saudi Arabia, a nation that should be on that list. Rockefeller told Fox News Channel's Chris Wallace that he warned the Syrians and Saudis that Bush had made up his mind to attack Iraq. That's right! Senator Rockefeller gave a country that harbors terrorists, Syria, and a nation in which certain members of its royal family financially support terrorists, Saudi Arabia, inside information about what he believed were Bush's war plans.

And we wonder what happened to the weapons of mass destruction? I hope President Bush did mislead Rockefeller on prewar intelligence and postwar intelligence, as well. The Senator is a one man snitch operation paid for by US taxpayers.

And the Democrats are great at providing counterintelligence operations for the terrorists. For example, there were military intelligence reports that indicated they were monitoring Osama bin Laden's cellphone. Well, within an hour the entire world including Osama found out about it thanks to an idiot Senator who went in front of the TV cameras and blabbed about the surveillance to the world. Sprint lost a customer that day with Osama probably switching to AT &T.

There are many other examples: from Geraldo Rivera tracing troop movements in the sand to reporters informing the world that US special forces where closing in on bin Laden or some other terrorist leader.

Here's an interesting pastime, whenever reading a newspaper or watching TV news or listening to newsradio, check out how many times you read or hear something that would be beneficial to you if you were a terrorist. You'll be shocked. Perhaps it's all Americans who are being outsmarted by the international terrorist network. Afterall, aren't we the ones who pay the salaries of their intelligence operatives?

This is the terrorist instruction manual that was published as an instruction manual, it supports your article.

For some reason, it has been several months since a copy of it has shown up.

In one it advised the terrorist to wear western casual clothing and to have a Boom Box, turned on......and look western.

granny......

http://jamestown.org/terrorism/news/article.php?articleid=2368849

Volume 1, Issue 8 (November 12, 2004)

INSIDE THIS ISSUE:
Radical Clerics in the Firing Line
Options Narrow for Avoiding an Insurgency in Southern Thailand
Al-Battar Number 22 Released
A New Leader for Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula?
How to Become a Mujahid

Al-Battar Number 22 Released

By Stephen Ulph

On November 10 the latest issue of al-Qaeda's online journal Mu'askar
al-Battar (no. 22) was posted on al-Ma'sada, a jihadist internet forum
(www.alm2sda.net – section "Jihadi Cells' [Muntada al-Khalaya
al-Jihadiyya]). Outside the standard on-going features on weaponry – in
this issue specializing on the use of revolvers in close combat, and a
detailed chapter on the Apache helicopter - the themes of the issue focus
on bin Laden's address to the U.S., the latest audio tape released by
al-Qaeda in Saudi Arabia and the progress of the struggle for Fallujah.

The editor highlights bin Laden's audio address threatening the United
States with financial ruin through attrition, and the evidence that "the
mujahideen have finally forced Bush to have recourse to an emergency
budget in order to continue the fight in Afghanistan and Iraq, which
indicates the success of the plan to exhaust [them] to the point of
bankruptcy, God willing". (al-Battar p.19).

The editor notes with satisfaction the reaction of the world's press, from
al-Quds al-Arabi's description of al-Qaeda as having restored its ranks,
and of bin Laden as "a political genius" putting his deep knowledge of
political events "to the service of issues affecting his nation". Or Jason
Burke's description in the UK daily the Guardian of bin Laden as "one of
the greatest masters of propaganda in history" who is "fighting to defend
his faith, culture and Islamic society against the western campaign waged
against Muslims". The editor also quotes the San Jose Mercury in its
description of how "American and Saudi intelligence were struck and
paralyzed" by the tape, and Newsweek's description by a U.S. official of
the "psychological shock" caused by the appearance of bin Laden on the
television screens, highlighting the failure to locate him. al-Battar also
publishes its take on the casualties suffered by the coalition in Iraq. Since
the beginning of Ramadan, the losses amount to 6,700 coalition soldiers,
550 pieces of equipment destroyed or crippled and 27 aircraft including an
F16. (al-Battar pp.19-21).

The Chapter on Istikhbarat (Intelligence Gathering) provides some
interesting notes on how to accumulate intelligence on a potential target.
It prioritizes them thus: 1) the media, from which 70 per cent of
information may be derived; 2) telephone interception, which accounts for
25 per cent; and 3) human intelligence (espionage) which provides three
to four percent of intelligence material. "On arriving at a new zone", the
text explains, "the following method should be observed: obtain the local
telephone directory, tourist maps and newspapers, change your outward
guise, avoid places where you may be exposed to danger, familiarize
yourself with the local standards of security, culture, society, ethics and
services." (al-Battar pp.36-37).

Great thread! Confirms some of my suspictions.

Jim Kouri. Remember, the denizens of America's newsrooms believe they're the brightest bulbs in the stadium.

A symptom of a contemporary phenomenum that I call subtextual schism whereby conservatives and leftists bring different sets of underlying assumptions to debates. Allow me to illustrate with a couple of quotes that seem to mean different things depending upon your political orientation.

"Our troops have become the enemy"
Rep. John Murtha of Pennsylvania

“The fact is that, unlike during other times of national threat or crisis, the United States of America is not at war.”
Jimmy Carter

Stephen Ulph. the "psychological shock" caused by the appearance of bin Laden on the television screens

Olds Media disclosed their support of Islamofascism when they broadcast binny's propaganda.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.