Posted on 11/21/2005 3:01:08 PM PST by Main Street
I read with ashen resignation that Maureen Dowd, the professional spinster of the New York Times, will soon birth a book, no doubt parthogenetically, called Are Men Necessary? The problem apparently is that men have not found Maureen necessary. Hell hath . Clearly there is something wrong with men. I weary of the self-absorbed clucking of aging poultry.
Why is Maureen hermetically single? For starters, she is not just now your classic hot ticket. Shes not just over the hill, but into the mountains, to Grandmothers house we go. She probably gets more daily maintenance than a 747, but she still looks as though a vocational school held an injection-molding contest and everyone lost. That leaves her with only her personality as bait. The prognosis is grim.
Was that ungentlemanly? She makes a career of being disagreeable about men. Whats sauce for the gander is sauce for the goose, say I.
Reading her unending plaints, one concludes that she is deeply in lovewith herself, and too loyal ever to cheat with a man. Behind her writing you always hear the little voice, Im so wonderful, so elite why doesnt somebody marry me? (Well, Maureen, I can give you a few ideas. Youre a pain in the ass .) Im so smart, Im so powerful, Im so, sooo elite, so talented, so special. As, in their way, are ingrown toenails. Im successful, shriek. Men hate me because Im smart. They feel threatened because Im so wonderful.
Actually, Maureen, you are no more threatening, or appealing, than somebody elses gym socks. I suspect that men dont like you because you arent likeable.
Now, precisely why are you so wonderful? Clearly you arent stupid. You are a competent if sophomoric writer. Dummies cant do that. But Ill tell you what, Sweet Potato: I dont think I know anyone who would want to go out with you. As best I can tell, should you have an original thought, it would need counseling, for depression and loneliness.
Smart women are an attraction of Washington, at least the parts off the cocktail circuit. They made fifteen years in that wretched city bearable for me. I knew women with serious brains, golden-girl biochemists at NIH, a gal who ran a federal positron-emission tomography lab, weirded-out computer techs, startlingly good writers and chicks who had popped scores you wouldnt believe on tests at NSA that arent supposed to exist. Theyd eat you for lunch, Maureen.
Now, I know that people at the New York Times have ample self-esteem, and indeed come coated with it to a depth of inches. How about we have a little understanding here. In journalism as in politics, advancement has little to do with merit. Have you checked the contents of the White House lately? Dan Rather and Connie Chung are pinnacles of anything at all? Ive been around this game as long as you have and I know how the scam works. Getting to the upper ranks of journalism is a matter of luck, sexual sharing, brown-nosing, and staying carefully within the bounds of the regnant politics of the newsroom.
You are journalistic glitter, MaureenReporter Barbie, a literary Streisand. While working for the Times is perhaps nothing to be ashamed of, Id keep quiet about it.
Maureens agonizing does however provide exegesis of the American female mind at a curious moment. Again and again their question seems to be, what form of pretense is needed to achieve marriage? Must I feign sex-kittenhood? Be a calculated suck-up who always laughs at his jokes? Hide my brains? The underlying idea is that they must commit some fraud to attract a man. This of course implies that they arent attractive without committing fraud.
Ill give them that.
Those of us who have wives from Mexico, Thailand, the Philippines, Chile, or China view Maureen as being a very strange creature indeed, perhaps expelled from a geothermal vent. (Hi! Im Fred. Whats your phylum?) Like Maureen, so many gringas dont seem to know who they are, what they are, what they want to be, or how to get there. I think of a tinkertoy construction made by an insane two-year-old: a lot of protruding parts that dont fit together.
By contrast foreign women are psychologically coherent. They are sexy because they are women and like being sexy, not as a Vaudeville act or marketing tool. Resentment is not their primary emotion. They love their children and regard raising them as a pleasure, not an imposition of which they are ashamed.
If you read Maureen and her littermates, you realize that they are those most uncomfortable of women, heterosexual man-haters. For example, Maureen, from her new book:
Men, apparently, learn early to protect their eggshell egos from high-achieving women. The girls said they hid the fact that they went to Harvard from guys they met because it was the kiss of death.
Who would marry that? Yet it is classic Maureen, snotty, catty, hostile. As for her own Kevlar ego, theres this, from her interview with Howard Kurtz:
Even after a decade of writing a New York Times column, she admits to being very thin-skinned about criticism. I'm just not temperamentally suited to it, Dowd says. The first couple of years I spent curled up on the floor and crying.
Oh.
The drumbeat of animosity is never missing from her hetero-anguished feminism. Men are vain, frightened, immature, unreliable, treacherous, fascinated by gewgaws, obsessed with sex, and unfaithful. Several questions arise. If men are so bad, why does Maureen want one? What kind of men has she been running around with? Those closely resembling herself, it sounds as if. Most to the point, why would any man want anything to do with such a woman?
This confusion and hostility has made the American woman into an internationally acclaimed shrew. Yes, there are degrees, and perhaps more exceptions than examples, but talk to white men from Washington to Hong Kong and you see the same shudder.
These gals are wound too tight. Recently I was aboard a highway bus in an American enclave in Mexico. A gringa wanted to get off where there was no stop. The driver didnt understand her. In Mexico they speak Spanish, a point which apparently had eluded her. She began yelling at him abusively. (Verbatim quote: Youre the worst! You suck! Youre the worst!)
They do this. People notice. A friend somehow found himself talking with a gringa who had one of those puffy little white dogs you could buff a truck with. He said, Cute little thing. Ive got a real dog. This mild witticism set her into yelling.
Par.
Howard Kurtz, Washington Post, Saturday, November 5, 2005
Ask Michael Douglas...
Check your utensils at the chapel door.
Ouch! That's gonna hurt. Better put some ice on that.
You first.
Can I marry her opposite instead?
This'll do the job, and it won't be intimidated by her...heh...superior intellect:
http://www.drugstore.com/qxp70221_333181_sespider/hitachi/magic_wand_vibrator.htm
Damn, put some ice on that Mo cuz it's gotta hurt. He just beat her like a hoe who came up short on a Saturday night.
Marry an
Anus With Teeth !?
No Thanks.
Congressman Billybob
Latest column: "What If the French Had Pulled a 'Murtha' in 1781?"
Steyn calls her the elderly schoolgirl columnist of the NYT.
Let's just hope she reads this piece.
So, who's willing to take one for the team?
Nobody?
I didn't think so!
No one'll have her.
Hey swervie! Someone' talkin' 'bout yer dawgs...
[seee last paragraph]
Someone spent some money to fix her up. Check this video with Chris Matthews posted by Mia:
http://www.deletehillary.com/matt-dowd-do-hilL.swf
If she'll convert to Islam I'll marry her for the wife-beating aspect alone.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.