Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gary Glitter 'may face firing squad'
Telegraph ^ | 11/21/05

Posted on 11/21/2005 12:45:27 PM PST by Borges

Gary Glitter could face death by firing squad after he was accused of having sex with a girl aged just 12, Vietnamese police have said.

Glitter allegedly had sex with a 12-year-old girl Two girls, aged 12 and 18, told police they had sex with the former singer - real name Paul Francis Gadd - at his rented home in the southern resort of Vung Tau in Vietnam.

Under Vietnamese law, sexual contact with a minor carries varying degrees of penalties, depending on the charge.

"Obscene acts with a child can lead to up to 12 years in prison while child rape carries the maximum penalty of death before a firing squad," a Vietnamese police officer said.

"Having sex with a 12-year-old girl, regardless of whether he had her consent, is still considered child rape under Vietnamese law".

The 61-year-old former singer was arrested two days ago at Tan Son Nhat International Airport in Ho Chi Minh City as he tried to flee the country.

He left his rented home in Vung Tau a week ago amid allegations about his relationships with two teenage girls.

Glitter has been taken back to Vung Tau for further investigation by the police.

A Foreign Office spokeswoman said: "We are aware of the arrest of a British national and consular support is being provided."

Glitter was convicted in Britain in 1999 of possessing child pornography and served half of a four-month jail sentence before being released.


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: deathpenalty; firingsquad; freaks; garyglitter; pedophiles; pedophilia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-130 next last
To: Borges
Without a wig:


101 posted on 11/21/2005 5:06:00 PM PST by Milhous (Sarcasm - the last refuge of an empty mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

"Did you see this thread?" ping


102 posted on 11/21/2005 5:06:19 PM PST by indcons (FReepmail indcons to join the "Military History" ping list)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1066AD
Hmm, what is rape if not forcible ?

Statutory.

103 posted on 11/21/2005 5:09:08 PM PST by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

Surprisingly enough, the feds have never banned the death penalty for child rape. The SCOTUS has left the issue open, and the 5th Circuit hasn't ruled on the issue.


104 posted on 11/21/2005 5:13:17 PM PST by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Revolting cat!; WillamShakespeare

105 posted on 11/21/2005 5:13:38 PM PST by Milhous (Sarcasm - the last refuge of an empty mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: JustAnotherOkie

D'ohh! < headsmack >

Gotta brush up on my 70s Glam Rock trivia.


106 posted on 11/21/2005 5:21:43 PM PST by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: buwaya

wasn't there some kid from ohio about 10-15 years ago who was being caned for destroying property there... or was it another country


107 posted on 11/21/2005 5:23:39 PM PST by InvisibleChurch (The search for someone to blame is always successful. - Robert Half)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: indcons

Didn't see it until you pinged me. Sounds like a plan to me. The US waaaaay underuses the death penalty. I'm a pro-death penalty type. For murder, rape, child molestation, arson that kills anyone, kidnapping - punishment should be death. And not after 15 or 20 years. And hanging or firing squad is just fine.

For someone facing certain death, it gives them a chance to repent of their crime, which helps them in their next life. Plus the earth is freed of their presence.


108 posted on 11/21/2005 6:17:10 PM PST by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: PAR35
Surprisingly enough,the feds have never banned the death penalty for child rape.The SCOTUS has left the issue open,and the 5th Circuit hasn't ruled on the issue.

I was thinking more along the lines of individual states (and not the SCOTUS)having decided to reduce the maximum penalty for rape from execution...because doing so would remove the incentive that the perp might otherwise have to kill his rape victim.

109 posted on 11/21/2005 6:19:49 PM PST by Gay State Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: InvisibleChurch

Singapore


110 posted on 11/21/2005 6:22:10 PM PST by Skywalk (Transdimensional Jihad!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Borges

This would explain why Michael Jackson fled to Bahrain rather than Vietnam.


111 posted on 11/21/2005 6:25:13 PM PST by Redcloak (We'll raise up our glasses against evil forces singin' "whiskey for my men and beer for my horses!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Borges

These creeps NEVER change. We cannot rehab them. They will always be perverts.

Kill them up front and be done with it.


112 posted on 11/21/2005 6:27:36 PM PST by ridesthemiles (ridesthemiles)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gordongekko909

Only if it is not a cousin????


113 posted on 11/21/2005 6:28:50 PM PST by ridesthemiles (ridesthemiles)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Milhous
Mr Glitter's character reference.


114 posted on 11/21/2005 6:48:02 PM PST by Revolting cat! ("In the end, nothing explains anything.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative
.because doing so would remove the incentive that the perp might otherwise have to kill his rape victim.

Don't buy into the made-up theories of the liberals. Compare the murder stats from the present with those from the era before the Supreme Court banned the death penalty for ordinary rape. Then compare the rape stats for the same two eras. Murder rates didn't go down as the rape numbers went through the roof. I dug out the stats last time I had this discussion with someone several years ago, but I don't know if I'm disposed to re-do the research tonight.

115 posted on 11/21/2005 7:14:58 PM PST by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: SteveMcKing

who is this guy?


116 posted on 11/21/2005 7:21:29 PM PST by television is just wrong (Our sympathies are misguided with illegal aliens...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: television is just wrong

He made that annoying "stadium rock" song that goes: "na na na na - HEY!"

If you are a good little sheeple, you would sing along and clap at football games.


117 posted on 11/21/2005 7:30:19 PM PST by SteveMcKing ("I was born a Democrat. I expect I'll be a Democrat the day I leave this earth." -Zell Miller '04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: SteveMcKing

oh, ok.


118 posted on 11/21/2005 8:16:59 PM PST by television is just wrong (Our sympathies are misguided with illegal aliens...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: NotJustAnotherPrettyFace; Rastus
I wouldn't exactly call him a "one-hit wonder". He did "Pa Pa Ooh Mow Mow" as well.

Lots of people have done Pa Pa Ooh Mow Mow over the years. The Beach Boys were doing it as part of their stage act in 1964.

Example: Queen could have done nothing else except write "We Will Rock You" and still made it big.

Interesting you mention Queen. The first single released by May, Mercury, and Taylor (the three singers in Queen) was under the name "Larry Lurex" as a spoof of Gary Glitter's name.

119 posted on 11/21/2005 8:20:18 PM PST by MikeD (We live in a world where babies are like velveteen rabbits that only become real if they are loved.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: 1066AD

Then it depends; it might be statutory rape, some degree of sexual assault, or something else, depending on the specifics.


120 posted on 11/21/2005 9:09:43 PM PST by Gordongekko909 (I know. Let's cut his WHOLE BODY off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-130 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson