Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

John Kerry’s America (1971 WFB speech)
National Review Online ^ | 6/8/1971 | WFB

Posted on 11/17/2005 10:47:51 AM PST by Rodney King

John Kerry’s America What he said about us.

By William F. Buckley Jr.

EDITOR'S NOTE: This is the text of William F. Buckley Jr.'s June 8, 1971, commencement address to the United States Military Academy at West Point. The speech appears here as it is in Let Us Talk of Many Things : The Collected Speeches.

The morale in the armed services was low, reflecting the impasse and progressive demoralization in Vietnam, and especially the trial of Lieutenant William Calley for the massacre at Mylai. A drastic charge, flamboyantly made by decorated veteran John Kerry (now a United States senator from Massachusetts), had been rapturously received. Kerry ascribed to our soldiers in Vietnam uncivilized, barbarous practices. I devoted my talk to asking about Mr. Kerry's charges and reflecting on their implications.

A great deal has been written lately on the spirit of progressivism at West Point. I note that a generation ago, cadets were not permitted to read a newspaper, whereas today, each cadet room receives a daily copy of the New York Times. I know now what it means to be nostalgic for the good old days.

I read ten days ago the full text of the quite remarkable address delivered by John Kerry before the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations. It was an address, I am told, that paralyzed the committee by its eloquence and made Mr. Kerry — a veteran of the war in Vietnam, a pedigreed Bostonian, a graduate of Yale University — an instant hero.

After reading it I put it aside, deeply troubled as I was by the haunting resonance of its peroration, which so moved the audience. The words he spoke were these:

"[We are determined] to undertake one last mission, to search out and destroy the last vestige of this barbaric war, to pacify our hearts, to conquer the hate and fear that have driven this country these last ten years and more, so that when, thirty years from now, our brothers go down the street without a leg, without an arm, or a face, and small boys ask why, we will be able to say 'Vietnam!' and not mean a desert, not a filthy obscene memory, but the place where America finally turned and where soldiers like us helped it in the turning."

"Where America finally turned." We need to wonder: where America finally turned from what?

Mr. Kerry, in introducing himself to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, made it plain that he was there to speak not only for himself, but for what he called "a very much larger group of veterans in this country." He then proceeded to describe the America he knows, the America from which he enjoined us all to turn.

In Southeast Asia, he said, he saw "not isolated incidents but crimes committed on a day-to-day basis with the full awareness of officers at all levels of command."

A grave charge, but the sensitive listener will instantly assume that Mr. Kerry is using the word "crime" loosely, as in, "He was criminally thoughtless in not writing home more often to his mother." But Mr. Kerry quickly interdicted that line of retreat. He went on to enumerate precisely such crimes as are being committed "on a day-to-day basis, with the full awareness of officers at all levels of command." He gave tales of torture, of rape, of Americans who "randomly shot at civilians, razed villages in a fashion reminiscent of Genghis Khan, shot cattle and dogs for fun, poisoned food stocks, and generally ravaged the countryside of South Vietnam in addition to the normal ravages of war."

Mr. Kerry informed Congress that what threatens the United States is "not Reds, and not redcoats," but "the crimes" we are committing. He tells us that we have "created a monster, a monster in the form of millions of men who have been taught to deal and to trade in violence, and who have returned with a sense of anger."

Most specifically he singled out for criticism a sentence uttered by Mr. Agnew here at West Point a year ago: "Some glamorize the criminal misfits of society while our best men die in Asian rice paddies to preserve the freedom which most of those misfits abuse." Mr. Kerry insists that the so-called misfits are the true heroes, inasmuch as it was they who "were standing up for us in a way that nobody else in this country dared to." As for the men in Vietnam, he added, "we cannot consider ourselves America's 'best men' when we are ashamed of and hated for what we were called on to do in Southeast Asia."

And indeed, if American soldiers have been called upon to rape and to torture and to exterminate non-combatants, it is obvious that they should be ashamed, less obvious why they have not expressed that shame more widely on returning to the United States, particularly inasmuch as we have been assured by Mr. Kerry that they have been taught to deal and to trade in violence.

Are there extenuating circumstances? Is there a reason for our being in Vietnam?

"To attempt to justify the loss of one American life in Vietnam, Cambodia, or Laos by linking such loss to the preservation of freedom . . . is . . . the height of criminal hypocrisy, and it is that kind of hypocrisy which we feel has torn this country apart." It is then, we reason retrospectively, not alone an act of hypocrisy that caused the joint chiefs of staff and the heads of the civilian departments engaged in strategic calculations to make the recommendations they made over the past ten years, to three Presidents of the United States: it was not merely hypocrisy, but criminal hypocrisy. The nature of that hypocrisy? "All," Mr. Kerry sums up, "that we were told about the mystical war against Communism."

The indictment is complete.

It is the indictment of an ignorant young man who is willing to condemn in words that would have been appropriately used in Nuremberg the governing class of America: the legislators, the generals, the statesmen. And, reaching beyond them, the people, who named the governors to their positions of responsibility and ratified their decisions in several elections.

The point I want to raise is this: If America is everything that John Kerry says it is, what is it appropriate for us to do? The wells of regeneration are infinitely deep, but the stain described by John Kerry goes too deep to be bleached out by conventional remorse or resolution: better the destruction of America, if, to see ourselves truly, we need to look into the mirror John Kerry holds up for us. If we are a nation of sadists, of kid-killers and torturers, of hypocrites and criminals, let us be done with it, and pray that a great flood or fire will destroy us, leaving John Kerry and maybe Mrs. Benjamin Spock to take the place of Lot, in reseeding a new order.

Gentleman, how many times, in the days ahead, you will need to ask yourselves the most searching question of all, the counterpart of the priest's most agonizing doubt: Is there a God? Yours will be: Is America worth it?

John Kerry's assault on this country did not rise fullblown in his mind, like Venus from the Cypriot Sea. It is the crystallization of an assault upon America which has been fostered over the years by an intellectual class given over to self-doubt and self-hatred, driven by a cultural disgust with the uses to which so many people put their freedom. The assault on the military, the many and subtle vibrations of which you feel as keenly as James Baldwin knows the inflections of racism, is an assault on the proposition that what we have, in America, is truly worth defending. The military is to be loved or despised according as it defends that which is beloved or perpetuates that which is despised. The root question has not risen to such a level of respectability as to work itself into the platform of a national political party, but it lurks in the rhetoric of the John Kerrys, such that a blind man, running his fingers over the features of the public rhetoric, can discern the meaning of it:

Is America worth it?

That is what they are saying to you. And that is what so many Americans reacted to in the case of Lieutenant Calley. Mistakenly, they interpreted the conviction of Calley as yet another effort to discredit the military. And though they will not say it in as many words, they know that if there is no military, it will quickly follow that there will be no America, of the kind that they know, that we know. The America that listens so patiently to its John Kerrys, the America that shouldered the great burden of preserving oases of freedom after the great curtain came down with that Bolshevik subtlety that finally expressed itself in a Wall, to block citizens of the socialist utopia from leaving, en route even to John Kerry's America; the America that all but sank under the general obloquy, in order to stand by, in Southeast Asia, a commitment it had soberly made, to the cause of Containment — I shall listen patiently, decades hence, to those who argue that our commitment in Vietnam and our attempt to redeem it were tragically misconceived. I shall not listen to those who say that it was less than the highest tribute to national motivation, to collective idealism, and to international rectitude. I say this with confidence because I have never met an American who takes pleasure from the Vietnam War or who desires to exploit the Vietnamese.

So during those moments when doubt will assail you, moments that will come as surely as the temptations of the flesh, I hope you will pause. I know, I know, at the most hectic moments of one's life it isn't easy — indeed, the argument can be made that neither is it seemly — to withdraw from the front line in order to consider the general situation philosophically. But what I hope you will consider, during these moments of doubt, is the essential professional point: Without organized force, and the threat of the use of it under certain circumstances, there is no freedom, anywhere. Without freedom, there is no true humanity. If America is the monster of John Kerry, burn your commissions tomorrow morning and take others, which will not bind you in the depraved conspiracy you have heard described. If it is otherwise, remember: the freedom John Kerry enjoys, and the freedom I enjoy, are, quite simply, the result of your dedication. Do you wonder that I accepted the opportunity to salute you?

TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: kerry; lyingtraitor; traitor; wheresteresa; williamfbuckley
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
A great speech.
1 posted on 11/17/2005 10:47:52 AM PST by Rodney King
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Rodney King
Believe that if Vietnam were today, that we might win it. Liberals don't have their stranglehold on all sources of media now.

A side point: who were we fighting? Communists. Same people that killed close to a 100 million of their own people. We were right to fear them! They were an "evil empire."

Now, when the likes of Jane Fonda say or do something stupid, they are very strongly criticized and countered by Conservatives and the Conservative media. Something that they are shocked by since they have had a monopoly on the media. Not anymore!

Still a very tough battle the fight (not referring to the Iraq War itself but the BS campaign that the Left are now waging against the War).

We Conservatives need to keep on top of this. Thank you Freerepublic!
2 posted on 11/17/2005 11:05:24 AM PST by dhs12345 (w)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rodney King

I'd pay good money to see someone put one of these babies on "Hanoi" John or Turayzuh's bumper.

3 posted on 11/17/2005 11:06:44 AM PST by MarineBrat (When it rains, New Orleans makes its own gravy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rodney King; Laurita; CMS; The Sailor; txradioguy; Jet Jaguar; Defender2; OneLoyalAmerican; ...
Please take the time to read this
Click Below for full details
Hanoi Kerry is in in Violation of the
US Constitution 14th Amendment Section 3

Violation of 18 US CODE 2381

Violation of 18 USC 953
- Private correspondence with foreign governments

Violation of UCMJ Section 904. ART. 104.
- Aiding the Enemy.

Click Here if the 1st url is unavailable.

I VOW to the 58,000 + Brothers and Sisters on
The Viet Nam Wall who never came home
and to those who died at home from injuries and
from broken hearts.

"I will do everything I LEGALLY can
to expose Hanoi Kerry once and for all.

I will not tire, I will not falter,
and I will not fail.

I solemnly vow to do all I can to restore your honor
until I give my last breath on earth."

I spent 3yrs on a destroyer in the Navy from
'66-'69 as a Gunners Mate, GMG3.
USS CORRY DD 817 '68-'69 Gulf of Tonkin Yacht Club Member.
Home port was Norfolk Virginia
and sailed with her in the North Atlantic,
Caribbean,(dealt with Cuban gunboats off of Havana in Jan '68)
thru the Panama Canal, across the Pacific to Viet Nam and back.

I was there the same time Kerry was.
I was there Oct'68-Apr'69 on the destroyer USS Corry DD-817
which sometime supplied PCF's and PBR's
and provided gunfire and gunfire support
in North AND South Viet Nam.

My ship may have even supplied
Kerry's boat in the Mekong Delta

Although there are many similarities between naval gunfire support
and Operation Sea Dragon (which ended Nov '68), they differ in two important areas:
naval gunfire support is normally fired at the request of troops ashore,
while Sea Dragon's mission is the interdiction of supplies and destruction
of military targets; and naval gunfire support is always conducted in South Vietnam,
while Sea Dragon missions are fired only above the demilitarized zone.

29 US Navy ships received gunfire from Viet Cong shore batteries.
My ship DID NOT get hit by the VC.

In Feb '69 my ship was part of Operation Bold Mariner
which was the largest amphibious assault since Korea.

This is EXACTLY what I used to do as a Gunner's Mate 3rd class.
DoughtyOne found this top pic from another ship.
The bottom pic is the ship I served on.


4 posted on 11/17/2005 11:14:57 AM PST by 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub (Be wary of FReepers who preach and howl : Get over it Tonk. Move On! mmmm Move On as in Fat Boy?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rodney King
catch-up of Kerry in 1998..... all mispelled words are mine

Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.) Argued That Saddam "Obviously" Was Working, "Secretly And Otherwise" On Weapons Of Mass Destruction, Kerry: "Mr President, over the years, a consensus has developed within the international community that the production and use of weapons of mass destruction has to be halted. We and others worked hard to develop arms control regimes toward that end, but obviously Saddam Hussein's goal is to do otherwise. Iraq and North Korea and others have made it clear that they are still trying, secretly and otherwise, to develop those weapons." (Sen. John Kerry, Congressional Record, 10/10/98

Kerry Said Saddam Used Weapons Of Mass Destruction In The Past And Wanted "To Try...To Continue To Do So." "Saddam Hussein has already used these weapons and has made it clear that he has the intent to continue to try, by virtue of his duplicity and secrecy, to continue to do so. ... It is a threat with respect to the potential of terrorist activities on a global basis." (Sen. John Kerry, Press Conference, 2/23/98)

5 posted on 11/17/2005 11:15:13 AM PST by malia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub

John Kerry is a traitor.


6 posted on 11/17/2005 11:17:49 AM PST by StarCMC (Old Sarge is my hero...doing it right in Iraq! Vaya con Dios, Sarge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub


7 posted on 11/17/2005 11:20:37 AM PST by E.G.C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: All
Back then it was the myth of round the clock "atrocities."

Today it's the myth of round the clock "torturing."

If our military was under the command of an international peoples' organization and that organization was committing atrocities and torture (real atrocities and torture as defined by a dictionary) the left would not care one whit.

"Atrocities" and "torture" are not the issues for them. False charges of "atrocities" and "torture" are weapons. The issue is the destruction of our sovereignty and military. IMO.

8 posted on 11/17/2005 11:32:13 AM PST by WilliamofCarmichael (Hillary is the she in shenanigans.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub

Thanks for the ping!

9 posted on 11/17/2005 11:33:25 AM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MarineBrat

how much?

10 posted on 11/17/2005 11:35:02 AM PST by bitt ('George Bush was to go up in flames this Fall, not Paris.'...Richard Baehr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Rodney King; 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub

Guess we could ask the Rats the same question today. Is America worth it?

11 posted on 11/17/2005 11:44:36 AM PST by Jimmy Valentine's brother ( We need a few more Marines like Lt. Gen. James Mattis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub

JF'nK is a lying traitor!

Hang 'em High ~ Bump!

12 posted on 11/17/2005 12:03:26 PM PST by blackie (Be Well~Be Armed~Be Safe~Molon Labe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub


13 posted on 11/17/2005 12:08:39 PM PST by Soaring Feather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Rodney King

John Kerry is yesterday's news.

14 posted on 11/17/2005 12:17:21 PM PST by Clintonfatigued (Sam Alito Deserves To Be Confirmed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub; Zacs Mom; PhilDragoo; Happy2BMe; potlatch; ntnychik; Smartass; Boazo; ...

double ping for a great re-visit to the LT's words...

15 posted on 11/17/2005 1:18:49 PM PST by bitt ('George Bush was to go up in flames this Fall, not Paris.'...Richard Baehr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: WilliamofCarmichael

now where did those damn tigers go...hmm...

16 posted on 11/17/2005 1:19:44 PM PST by bitt ('George Bush was to go up in flames this Fall, not Paris.'...Richard Baehr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: bitt
how much?

Oh, I dunno.... say $50? :)

Now if you can procure a high quality video of Old Equestri-face's reaction to it, that'd be worth lots more.

17 posted on 11/17/2005 1:48:22 PM PST by MarineBrat (When it rains, New Orleans makes its own gravy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MarineBrat
if you can procure a high quality video of Old Equestri-face's reaction to it, that'd be worth lots more.

"Oh, boy! I'd better get THAT bumper sticker off my SUV before Teresa sees it! She'd have quite the little petit mal...and then she might notice I swiped her new lipstick, too...."

18 posted on 11/17/2005 1:56:48 PM PST by bitt ('George Bush was to go up in flames this Fall, not Paris.'...Richard Baehr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Rodney King

John Kerry, November 16, 2005......thirty four years later.....
"Democrats shot back immediately, with the party’s 2004 presidential nominee, Sen. John Kerry of Massachusetts, saying “it is hard to name a government official with less credibility on Iraq” than Cheney."

19 posted on 11/17/2005 4:39:18 PM PST by freema (Proud Marine Mom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

Thanks for the ping!

20 posted on 11/17/2005 8:52:27 PM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson