Skip to comments.
Backing out possible, not simple [Dover trial aftermath]
York (PA) Daily Record ^
| 11/17/05
| MICHELLE STARR
Posted on 11/17/2005 10:00:15 AM PST by Right Wing Professor
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-39 last
To: Right Wing Professor
Estimates I've seen for this case have been a kewl $1.7 m. I'm in the wrong line of work, dammit.
To: Senator Bedfellow
But at least some people like and trust you.
22
posted on
11/17/2005 1:47:24 PM PST
by
furball4paws
(One of the last Evil Geniuses, or the first of their return.)
To: All
Who, or what, is this Ebola University in California?
23
posted on
11/17/2005 1:54:59 PM PST
by
furball4paws
(One of the last Evil Geniuses, or the first of their return.)
To: furball4paws
I didn't think that would happen even at the start. Just a lot of angry dissent here on the forums from people who are both far more knowledgeable about life sciences than thousands of researchers with degrees and years of research under their belt and far better versed on US law than anyone who ever went to law school.
24
posted on
11/17/2005 1:55:01 PM PST
by
Dimensio
(http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
To: PatrickHenry
Could be half a million, before it's all over. (Give or take a few hundred thousand.) Saw this issue in a previous thread a few weeks back; the estimate of the plaintiffs' legal bill at that time was reported in the media as being around $1 million.
To: js1138
I think perhaps the school board members will face a class action suit by the taxpayers, and may lose on the basis of their perjury. I don't think public officials are immune from the results of actions taken in bad faith. So to speak. You might be on to something, there; especially if the boards members who lied under oath are subsequently charged and convicted for it.
To: Right Wing Professor
Napierskie asked the board to revoke the curriculum change that includes intelligent design, agree not to add it again and ask their legal representation, Thomas More Law Center, to file a motion to dismiss the lawsuit against them and pay $1 in damages.
I'll do anything you want just please, please, please don't let the judge rule on this.
27
posted on
11/17/2005 2:32:03 PM PST
by
ml1954
(NOT the disruptive troll seen frequently on CREVO threads)
To: <1/1,000,000th%
DI supported ID in the classroom, before they opposed it.
And the IDer is very disappointed in DI.
28
posted on
11/17/2005 2:35:31 PM PST
by
ml1954
(NOT the disruptive troll seen frequently on CREVO threads)
To: PatrickHenry
Now, it looks like the school board may end up with a titanic legal bill.Not to mention that certain members will be lucky to escape perjury charges!
29
posted on
11/17/2005 3:38:06 PM PST
by
Stultis
(I don't worry about the war turning into "Vietnam" in Iraq; I worry about it doing so in Congress.)
To: furball4paws
Yes, they do - the fools >:)
To: ml1954
And the IDer is very disappointed in DI. You mean you would have preferred they had become involved in this case, and been associated with the school board members revealed on the witness stand as serial liars?
31
posted on
11/17/2005 3:42:04 PM PST
by
Stultis
(I don't worry about the war turning into "Vietnam" in Iraq; I worry about it doing so in Congress.)
To: Stultis
Lots of people lie in court. Ever hear of a perjury trial? If they get charged, they may bargain to never run for the school board again. I can't see more happening re: the perjury.
Now, being sued for legal costs. That could happen. I doubt if many of them have much, though.
32
posted on
11/17/2005 4:44:22 PM PST
by
furball4paws
(One of the last Evil Geniuses, or the first of their return.)
To: Stultis
You mean you would have preferred they had become involved in this case, and been associated with the school board members revealed on the witness stand as serial liars?
Well, yeah. I like happy endings.
33
posted on
11/17/2005 5:36:42 PM PST
by
ml1954
(NOT the disruptive troll seen frequently on CREVO threads)
To: narby
And what about the disposition of all those creationist textbooks in the library? You mean the ones that the schoolboard member ran church fundraisers to buy, and then under oath perjured himself by declaring that he "didn't know" where the money to pay for them had come from?
To: Dimensio
...from people who are both far more knowledgeable about life sciences than thousands of researchers with degrees and years of research under their belt and far better versed on US law than anyone who ever went to law school. It's amazing how many of those we have around here...
To: Right Wing Professor
Retreat? Never. Advance to the rear? Again, I say, NEVER!
36
posted on
11/17/2005 6:08:29 PM PST
by
LiteKeeper
(Beware the secularization of America)
To: Ichneumon; All
I've revised the
Evolution Troll's Toolkit. Now, the trollish arguments are roughly grouped into four categories. It's far from precise, but it's all that the project demands.
37
posted on
11/17/2005 6:20:53 PM PST
by
PatrickHenry
(Expect no response if you're a troll, lunatic, retard, or incurable ignoramus.)
To: narby
Maybe the Thomas More Center will take them as payment.
38
posted on
11/17/2005 6:29:29 PM PST
by
furball4paws
(One of the last Evil Geniuses, or the first of their return.)
To: Dimensio
LOL...I need my coffee! I had to read that twice, and am glad I did before responding!
39
posted on
11/18/2005 4:43:48 AM PST
by
Gondring
(I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes over my dead body!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-39 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson