Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Documents Reveal Saddam Hid WMD, Was Tied to Al Qaida
NewsMax ^ | Wednesday, Nov. 16, 2005 12:15 p.m. EST | Carl Limbacher

Posted on 11/16/2005 9:26:41 PM PST by TBP

Recently discovered Iraqi documents now being translated by U.S. intelligence analysts indicate that Saddam Hussein's government made extensive plans to hide Iraq's weapons of mass destruction before the U.S. invasion in March 2003 - and had deep ties to al Qaida before the 9/11 attacks.

The explosive evidence was discovered among "millions of pages of documents" unearthed by the Iraq Survey Group weapons search team, reports the Weekly Standard's Stephen Hayes.

In the magazine's Nov. 21 issue, Hayes reveals that the document cache now being examined contains "a thick stew of reports and findings from a variety of [Iraqi] intelligence agencies and military units."

Though the Pentagon has so far declined to make the bombshell papers public, Hayes managed to obtain a list of titles on the reports.

Topics headlined in the still embargoed Iraqi documents include: • Chemical Agent Purchase Orders (Dec. 2001)

• Formulas and information about Iraq's Chemical Weapons Agents

• Locations of Weapons/Ammunition Storage (with map)

• Denial and Deception of WMD and Killing of POWs

• Ricin research and improvement

• Chemical Gear for Fedayeen Saddam • Memo from the [Iraqi Intelligence Service] to Hide Information from a U.N. Inspection team (1997)

• Iraq Ministry of Defense Calls for Investigation into why documents related to WMD were found by UN inspection team

• Correspondence between various Iraq organizations giving instructions to hide chemicals and equipment

• Correspondence from [Iraqi Intelligence Service] to [the Military Industrial Commission] regarding information gathered by foreign intelligence satellites on WMD (Dec. 2002) • Cleaning chemical suits and how to hide chemicals

• [Iraqi Intelligence Service] plan of what to do during UNSCOM inspections (1996)

Still other reports suggest that Iraq's ties to al Qaida were far deeper than previously known, featuring headlines like:

• Secret Meeting with Taliban Group Member and Iraqi Government (Nov. 2000)

• Document from Uday Hussein regarding Taliban activity

• Possible al Qaeda Terror Members in Iraq

• Iraqi Effort to Cooperate with Saudi Opposition Groups and Individuals

• Iraqi Intel report on Kurdish Activities: Mention of Kurdish Report on al Qaeda - reference to al Qaeda presence in Salman Pak

• [Iraqi Intelligence Service] report on Taliban-Iraq Connections Claims

• Money Transfers from Iraq to Afghanistan

While the document titles sound stunning enough to turn the Iraq war debate on its head, Hayes cautions that it's hard to know for certain until the full text is available.

It's possible, he writes, "that the 'Document from Uday Hussein regarding Taliban activity' was critical of one or another Taliban policies. But it's equally possible, given Uday's known role as a go-between for the Iraqi regime and al Qaeda, that something more nefarious was afoot."

"What was discussed at the 'Secret Meeting with Taliban Group Member and Iraqi Government' in November 2000? It could be something innocuous. Maybe not. But it would be nice to know more."

Hayes also notes that an additional treasure trove of evidence on Saddam Hussein's support for al Qaida may be lost forever.

"When David Kay ran the Iraq Survey Group searching for weapons of mass destruction, he instructed his team to ignore anything not directly related to the regime's WMD efforts," he reports.

"As a consequence, documents describing the regime's training and financing of terrorists were labeled 'No Intelligence Value' and often discarded, according to two sources."


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: alqaedaandiraq; iraq; osama; saddam; terrorism; waronterror; wmds
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last
Well, just further evidence that Saddam did have weapons of mass destruction (other than the Democrats) and he was connected to Al Qaeda. But do you think that even the Administration will acknowledge this? No, becasue they have no backbone.
1 posted on 11/16/2005 9:26:43 PM PST by TBP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TBP

or he had a reason.


2 posted on 11/16/2005 9:28:45 PM PST by Chena (I'm not young enough to know everything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBP
Every time I see a thread with this type of headline, I click on with trembling fingers and bated breath.

Then I see it's from NewsMax..........

Leni

3 posted on 11/16/2005 9:28:56 PM PST by MinuteGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem; Tolik; Alice au Wonderland; Darksheare

if this pans out... there will be much spin in Donk circles


4 posted on 11/16/2005 9:29:33 PM PST by King Prout (many accuse me of being overly literal... this would not be a problem if many were not under-precise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBP
The explosive evidence was discovered among "millions of pages of documents" unearthed by the Iraq Survey Group weapons search team, reports the Weekly Standard's Stephen Hayes. In the magazine's Nov. 21 issue, Hayes reveals that the document cache now being examined contains "a thick stew of reports and findings from a variety of [Iraqi] intelligence agencies and military units."

I don't see the article on their website.

5 posted on 11/16/2005 9:30:23 PM PST by bnelson44 (Proud parent of a tanker!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBP

I'm not holding my breath on this stuff. Far too many can't misses slithered away into the sand during the Iraq invasion.

It's good news, and if it holds weight, all the better.


6 posted on 11/16/2005 9:30:53 PM PST by CheyennePress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinuteGal

yeah... NewsMax's credibility is only slightly less bad than those of the Alphabet News...

but IF this pans out...


7 posted on 11/16/2005 9:30:54 PM PST by King Prout (many accuse me of being overly literal... this would not be a problem if many were not under-precise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MinuteGal

This either true or not ...If it is true I want to hear it shouted from the rooftops


8 posted on 11/16/2005 9:31:22 PM PST by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: All

WHERE THE WMDS WENT

http://michellemalkin.com/archives/003917.htm


9 posted on 11/16/2005 9:31:41 PM PST by bnelson44 (Proud parent of a tanker!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TBP

You have that right. They let a prosecutor run a 2 year witch hunt over a statute that wasn't even violated. Bush is a piece of work, he falls head long into every demoncrat trap. There is a whole book out with what WMD they did find in Iraq. Yet, it is never quoted. This will not only be forgotten but will be shredded as soon as Bush finds it exists. Pubbies are all nutcases when it comes to politics.


10 posted on 11/16/2005 9:31:43 PM PST by Goreknowshowtocheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBP

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1523195/posts


11 posted on 11/16/2005 9:33:02 PM PST by RandallFlagg (Roll your own cigarettes! You'll save $$$ and smoke less!(Magnetic bumper stickers-click my name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBP

I never had a doubt.


12 posted on 11/16/2005 9:33:17 PM PST by demlosers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBP

BTTT


13 posted on 11/16/2005 9:33:22 PM PST by hattend (In France, it's not just the cheese that's soft and runny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBP

Sounds like the end of W's Rope-a-Dope is about to begin...finally.

The Dumbocrats have whined and moaned for two years about not finding WMD and that there no links of Saddam to al Qaeda. Hoist them on the petard of Saddam's documents, I say.

I can hardly wait (he says, hoping to hell this is as good as he wants it to be)!

And then we need an accounting of who was RIGHT and who was WRONG - politicians, foreign leaders, "journalists" and bloggers, TV media, etc.


14 posted on 11/16/2005 9:33:54 PM PST by RandyRep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinuteGal

I've pretty much gotten to where I can tell the source of an article by just looking at the thread headline. I almost never miss the NewsMax ones any more.


15 posted on 11/16/2005 9:34:37 PM PST by CFC__VRWC ("Anytime a liberal squeals in outrage, an angel gets its wings!" - gidget7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TBP

While Liberal girlymen on the left have an orgasm just at the mention of WMDs, intelligent, level-headed people are asking, "Where are they?"


16 posted on 11/16/2005 9:36:04 PM PST by FlingWingFlyer (It's no coincidence that the Democrat mascot is a jackass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bnelson44

This is an excellent article and is a must read.

BTTT


17 posted on 11/16/2005 9:36:31 PM PST by Chgogal (Viva Bush, the real revolutionary. We're winning the WOT in Iraq! Goodbye Che. Hello W!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: MinuteGal
I agree with you about NEWSMAX, but common sense tells me that Saddam had these weapons and he had help in hiding them, or removing them.

I still remember the reports that Saddam personally pinned medals on several Soviet Military officials shortly before we invaded and kicked Saddam's ass

18 posted on 11/16/2005 9:37:05 PM PST by MJY1288 (The main stream media has the wisdom of a new born and the vision of a still born)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TBP

This kind of information will never see the light of day with the MSM.


19 posted on 11/16/2005 9:37:58 PM PST by Jess Kitting
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBP

WMD's were never the real reason for the invasion. However, it was never offered as the only reason for it either.


20 posted on 11/16/2005 9:40:32 PM PST by Wiseghy (Discontent is the want of self-reliance: it is infirmity of will. – Ralph Waldo Emerson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson