Posted on 11/16/2005 11:20:59 AM PST by Pikamax
When will Novak talk?
Apparently Novak has said that "We'll all laugh" when we hear who it was.
Gotta be Wilson. Or some prominent Dem.
But Woodward is a liberal journalistic icon. He could not possibly be involved...
He has access to a grand jury that is different from the one which indicted Libby. It looks like Woodward is now in the hot seat.
Bingo!
exactly... this couple seems like they were shouting it on every corner to get attention or something
This is why Pincus "forgot" what Woodward told him, as it revealed Joe Wilson to be a liar. Reporters like Pincus routinely "forget" such things.
Got a link to this apology? Sounds like the wheels are coming off the DNC/MSM/Fitzgerald witch hunt.
I might hope that Fitzgerald would actually go after the real perps--Wilson, Plame, and their friends in the left wing press--if he had not revealed, when he indicted only Libby, that he is nothing but another lying, left-wing stooge.
I don't think anyone should get his hopes up that Fitzgerald will ferret out the truth anytime soon, because his intentions appear to be quite different.
What a lying sack of sh** this Pincus is. Just like he backtracked and said Joe maybe didn't tell me he 'saw' the forged documents... I misunderstood him. He backtracked on a couple other subjects of his first piece. Even mods and libs talk about this guy (love him or hate him), was always right on in facts when you read him... they are flummoxed on how since the Wilson story, all his professionalism jumped out the window.
No, he most certainly did NOT say that.
"But Woodward is a liberal journalistic icon. He could not possibly be involved..."
The comments about Woodward by the DU site are totally disparaging; basically Woodward is a suck-up and a shill for the administration in order to gain access and sell books.
IF Woodward mentioned to Libby that Wilson's wife was with the CIA BEFORE Cheney told Libby about the Plame, and Libby NOW testifies that his recollection could have been incorrect, that it could have been Woodward and NOT Russert who mentioned Wilson's wife, then what evidence does Fitzgerald have that would, "beyond a reasonable doubt," prove that Libby committed perjury or obstruction?
P.S. Woodward couldn't be all that bad if DU despises him (kinda like what is a reasonable settlement? "one that both the plaintiff and the defendant hate"
They keep saying a White House official told him, I could have sworn he testified it was a high level CIA person... big difference.
FYI.
Looks like Pincus might want to think about getting a good 'white collar defense lawyer' on retainer. ;-)
Pinz
Irrelevant MSM types playing up their self importance once again.
They are going to try to muddle this so bad that it will eventually get so convoluted that they will just say let's forget it and moveon.org.
Agreed -- it is time for Pincus to be indicted for lying to the GJ.
"They are going to try to muddle this so bad that it will eventually get so convoluted that they will just say let's forget it and moveon.org."
True that they might try to get out of this by muddying the waters but I wonder how some testimony from Andrea Mitchel might just settle things to the bottom and provide a bit of clearity.
I have a question - Why is it that this incident is getting 10 times the coverage Berger got from stealing and destroying top secret information from the government?
And what did Berger get? I think it was probation -
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.