But Woodward is a liberal journalistic icon. He could not possibly be involved...
"But Woodward is a liberal journalistic icon. He could not possibly be involved..."
The comments about Woodward by the DU site are totally disparaging; basically Woodward is a suck-up and a shill for the administration in order to gain access and sell books.
IF Woodward mentioned to Libby that Wilson's wife was with the CIA BEFORE Cheney told Libby about the Plame, and Libby NOW testifies that his recollection could have been incorrect, that it could have been Woodward and NOT Russert who mentioned Wilson's wife, then what evidence does Fitzgerald have that would, "beyond a reasonable doubt," prove that Libby committed perjury or obstruction?
P.S. Woodward couldn't be all that bad if DU despises him (kinda like what is a reasonable settlement? "one that both the plaintiff and the defendant hate"