[Elsie]

I guess your creationist sources sort of "forgot" to inform you about the vast amounts of scientific evidence for evolution, eh?

 

Ah yes:  the ever changing eyesocket size and shape drawing.

---

---

 

http://www.gcssepm.org/images/fossil_a.gif

[Ichneumon]

Ah yes: the ever changing eyesocket size and shape drawing.

False slander does not become you.

[b_sharp]

If you had a clearer understanding of evolution the changing size wouldn't be so confusing to you. The path between any two points in the line of change will be a 'drunkards walk' where some features wobble back and forth before reaching the more recent point. Neither the geographical position of a population nor the environment encountered at any one time by that population are static. Over a million years, for example, there is much room for staggering features.

Your complaint of inconsistent change is invalid when considered in light of extant population patterns.

[Thatcherite]

Things like changing eyesocket size are typically referred to by creationists as "microevolution". You need to look at the way things fit together, not their dimensions.