The problem is that this is a classic case of begging the question.
You're using your presumption in order to view the evidence as supporting your presumption. You have in no way *tested* your postulate.
Yes, I operate with the presumption, the given, the obvious evidence, and the simple truth. Matter is organized. That implies design. It does not need to be explained away or falsifiable to be scientific. It only begs the question of those who would attribute organized matter to some other cause. What is it?