...and you've demonstrated *such* a comprehensive and accurate understanding of science on these threads...
I never said it defines science, Fester. Try to keep up. But a hypothesis which cannot possibly be falsified *is* still a nonscientific one. And an utterly useless one as well.
Your verbal semantics are amusing, but they do not make your case. "Falsifiabiliy" does not define something as either scientific or unscientific. ID does not have to have a falsifiable hypothesis to be scientific. Neither does evolution.