Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

200 Russian engineers designing world's largest cargo plane
RIA Novosti ^ | 19:47 | 15/ 11/ 2005

Posted on 11/16/2005 3:11:23 AM PST by mym

MOSCOW, November 15 (RIA Novosti) - Two hundred Russian engineers in Moscow are designing a cargo aircraft, the Boeing-747LCF, that will be used to deliver components for the new Boeing-787 Dreamliner passenger plane.

"Moscow is handling the design of this special cargo plane, which will deliver components produced in Japan, Britain, France, and Russia to the aircraft-manufacturing plant in Seattle for final assembly of the Dreamliner, which will only take three days," Sergei Kravchenko, the president of U.S. aircraft giant Boeing in Russia and the CIS, said.

Kravchenko said the Central Aerohydrodynamic Institute (TsAGI) had built an experimental test bench for static and dynamic tests of life-size fuselage panels of the Boeing-787.

Under the Dreamliner project, Boeing also cooperates with the Russian Academy of Sciences and the All-Russian Aviation Materials Institute (VIAM).

Kravchenko said the new project had caused Boeing to increase its purchases of industrial titanium alloys in Russia.

The tests of the Boeing-787 will be finished in 2006. The plane will conduct its first flight in 2007 and will be supplied to the first buyer in Japan in 2008.

The volume of the market for the Dreamliner, which will replace the 767 model, is estimated at

3,500 planes over the next 20 years.

The Russia-Boeing Dreamliner project is being conducted within the framework of an agreement signed in November 2004 between the Russian Industry and Energy Ministry and Boeing.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; Miscellaneous; Russia; Technical; US: Washington
KEYWORDS: avia; boeing; russia; tech; usa
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-144 next last
I wonder what is a necessity to develop Boeing-747LCF? Existing AN-124 "Ruslan" and AN-225 "Mriya" are giant planes:

1 posted on 11/16/2005 3:11:24 AM PST by mym
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: mym; GarySpFc

Ping


2 posted on 11/16/2005 3:13:24 AM PST by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mym
200 Russian engineers designing world's largest cargo plane... hmmmm (dream sequence)....


3 posted on 11/16/2005 3:17:40 AM PST by mc5cents
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mc5cents

4 posted on 11/16/2005 3:24:16 AM PST by mym (Russia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mym

I'm guessing that reliability and maintainability are the issue.


5 posted on 11/16/2005 3:26:51 AM PST by FreedomPoster (Guns themselves are fairly robust; their chief enemies are rust and politicians) (NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mym
Answer, parts, repair, training..operational life expenses, Boeing loyalty.
6 posted on 11/16/2005 3:29:14 AM PST by Leisler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mym


7 posted on 11/16/2005 3:29:43 AM PST by CarrotAndStick (The articles posted by me needn't necessarily reflect my opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mym
Dang. That thing actually flies!


8 posted on 11/16/2005 3:30:03 AM PST by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CarrotAndStick

Beat me by 20 seconds!


9 posted on 11/16/2005 3:30:46 AM PST by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: mym

The Soviets/Russians were never good at making efficient or fast planes, but making freakin' huge planes is and has been their forte. Unless my memory is flawed, it was an Antonov that carried the EP-3 back from China in '01. Given enough time and money, the Rooskies could probably build a plane to pack up and move China itself.


10 posted on 11/16/2005 3:31:33 AM PST by ReignOfError
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mym
"I wonder what is a necessity to develop Boeing-747LCF? Existing AN-124 "Ruslan" and AN-225 "Mriya" are giant planes: ... "

Many years ago, a unified people had become so arrogant that they decided to build, and climb, a 'stairway' to heaven ... God saw all of this and said, "I don't think so."

God broke down their LEGO's and confounded their language so it could never happen again.

There seems to be a re-ignition of the old "I want to be God" desire.

The problem is, the babeling has been going on for some time now and the confounded languages have learned, and use the binary language.

Everything is the same thing only different.

Sit back and watch the show .... but be sure of your salvation ... and tell others how they too can be saved.

11 posted on 11/16/2005 3:34:13 AM PST by knarf (A place where anyone can learn anything ... especially that which promotes clear thinking.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mym
I wonder what is a necessity to develop Boeing-747LCF? Existing AN-124 "Ruslan" and AN-225 "Mriya" are giant planes:

They have very inefficient engines. They are desigmed as military transports with roll on roll of loading. The are great for transporting unique high value items that need to be transported long distances quickly, but it's not the plane you'd want routinely transporting components for a mass production line.

The 747-400 is a very efficient modern commercial cargo plane that has lots of spare parts available world wide. Just about half of the 1360 or so 747's ever built are 400 series. There is a large pool of pilots that can fly them. Basing the LCF on the 747 will save Boeing billions of dollars over the life of the 787 program. Sure lots of specialized ground equipment will be needed to load and unload cargo, but this plane will be used only between a few airports that will be equipped to handle them.

12 posted on 11/16/2005 3:44:21 AM PST by Paleo Conservative (Hey hey ho ho Andy Heyward's got to go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ReignOfError
==The Soviets/Russians were never good at making efficient or fast planes, but making freakin' huge planes is and has been their forte.==

You're wrong. Russian/USSR aviation program don't emphasize size against speed or efficiency. For example Russia has the fastest fighter MiG-25. The only example of AN-225 was created to carry Russian shuttle Buran:


The strongest side of Russian planes is a construction (glider), the weakes - avionics.
13 posted on 11/16/2005 3:46:04 AM PST by mym (Russia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

==They have very inefficient engines. They are desigmed as military transports with roll on roll of loading. The are great for transporting unique high value items that need to be transported long distances quickly, but it's not the plane you'd want routinely transporting components for a mass production line.==

Thanks for the explanation!


14 posted on 11/16/2005 3:49:05 AM PST by mym (Russia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
"The 747-400 is a very efficient modern commercial cargo plane...."

Thanks a ton for your analysis - would've taken me an hour to dig that stuff up.
(Don't we just LOVE Freerepublic.)

15 posted on 11/16/2005 3:51:37 AM PST by Psalm 73 ("Gentlemen, you can't fight in here - this is the War Room".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: mym

Wow!


16 posted on 11/16/2005 3:51:57 AM PST by The_Media_never_lie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dashing Dasher

Aviation ping.

What, no biplane model of the 747LCF?


17 posted on 11/16/2005 3:54:23 AM PST by Fierce Allegiance (Want to be on my Civil Engineers ping list? Just say so!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

Yeah, I didn' think about restrictions of routine transporting.


18 posted on 11/16/2005 3:56:25 AM PST by mym (Russia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Larry Lucido; CarrotAndStick

An-225 take-off: http://rapidshare.de/files/7709556/antonov.wmv.html

Scroll down, click on the 'FREE' button, then wait until the seconds at the bottom of the page count down to zero, and the link appears.


19 posted on 11/16/2005 4:02:01 AM PST by mym (Russia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: mym

Great picture. Thanks.


20 posted on 11/16/2005 4:02:03 AM PST by Jet Jaguar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-144 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson