Posted on 11/15/2005 8:49:00 PM PST by atomicweeder
Washington Post Assistant Managing Editor Bob Woodward testified under oath Monday in the CIA leak case that a senior administration official told him about CIA operative Valerie Plame and her position at the agency nearly a month before her identity was disclosed . . .
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
It's confusing because the lefties know that the truth won't help them.
The WaPost is front-paging this non-story for tomorrow...making a big deal possible about "Official A" so that other publications can make cheap shots with wild-eyed inferences.
The "unnamed senior administration figure" mentioned in this WaPost article is almost certainly Ari Fleischer...and the poor kid did little more than have lunch with Woodward and make the offhand comment that "Wilson's wife" may have been in a position to recommend Wilson for his second bogus Niger trip...which is why he wasn't indicted. He never said "Plame" and he wasn't running around to every reporter in town attempting to out her.
He just had one lunch with a guy who was writing a book on GWB, and made one offhand comment based upon what he'd been told by Scooter Libby.
Once.
But instead of naming him and explaining that the situation is innocent, the WaPost is keeping his ID "secret" so that other media outlets can spout "Rove, Cheney" a few dozen more times.
It's a cheap shot.
Notice they didn't say senior White House official. Probably someone in the State Department namely Powell's aide.
Curious... why do you think its Ari?
Fitzgerald has had many opportunities and two years to state conclusively whether the "outing" of Plame was or was not a crime.
He hasn't, and it wasn't.
I would think the unidentified official would be in a bit of trouble if he remembered his conversation with Woodward after the grand jury was sent home.
Imagine Pincus and Woodward on the stand playing he said/he said, one or both is either a perjurer or confused if Fitz does not indict either/both then the jury must assume Fitz believes confusion is a possibility.
Fitz should be giving Libby a big Fitzmas present in the form of dropping all charges.
I understand that. But one of Libby's "lies", according to Fitzgerald, was that he learned Plame's status from a reporter. Now, we know of one more reporter who knew...apparently before Libby did (according to Fitzgerald's timeline).
At the same time, Woodward testimony established that yet another reporter (Walter Pincus) also knew -- and at an early date (and that, incidentally, he may have lied about that very point to the grand jury).
It was actually published, once, early on in this sordid affair. Ari had a lunch with Scooter Libby in which Libby told him about Wilson's wife working for the CIA and recommending Wilson for his 2nd bogus Niger trip.
Bad timing. Ari had a scheduled lunch in the days that followed with Woodward.
Then Ari stepped down.
So it's not much of a stretch to conclude that Ari is "Offical A" (get it), and that he stepped down so that his one mistake wouldn't reflect badly upon his boss.
Remember, it was also a "Senior Admin Official" who told Novak who Plame was, and we have never found out who this "Non partisan gunslinger" is.
If Fitz gave the Leaker immunity to catch WH Officials, the gig is up. This blows Fitz's case to Hell. I would think the same Leaker to Novak is the Leaker to Woodward, and cannot be exposed.
Woodward busts Pincus, and he knows he cannot be held responsible for anything that happens from here on in. Classic.
We don't even know if this unidentified official was even asked to testify before the grand jury.
Not White House official and Novak said we would be surprised. Maybe Powell or his deputy.
Do you have a link to that conversation... this is the first I have heard of it.
If true it would answer many questions.
When asked by Fitzgerald if it was possible I told Libby I knew Wilson's wife worked for the CIA and was involved in the assignment, I testified that it was possible I asked a question about Wilson or his wife, but that I have not recollection of doing so.
<< Woodward permitted 60 Minutes to listen to tapes he recorded of his most important interviews, to read the transcripts, and to verify that the quotes he uses are based on recollections from participants in the key meetings.>>
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/11/17/60minutes/main529657.shtml
Woodward kept records and recordings of many people he interviewed for the book, but not regarding who told him about Plame. Obviously he did not believe it mattered enough to document, or even recall.
"Imagine Pincus and Woodward on the stand playing he said/he said, one or both is either a perjurer or confused if Fitz does not indict either/both then the jury must assume Fitz believes confusion is a possibility."
LOL..EXACTLY!!
bttt
Or, Tenet.
Either Woodward lied to the FBI or Pincus to the Grand Jury. Or maybe they were both confused like Libby.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.