[silverleaf]

A leading abortion advocate, Kate Michelman, says that if it had been up to Judge Samuel Alito, she might not have been allowed, many years ago, to have the baby she was carrying killed. As you may know by now, Alito once ruled in favor of a law requiring that a married woman get her husband's consent before aborting.

For Ms. Michelman, this ruling brings both bad memories and dark forebodings. At the time of her abortion, she recalls, her husband had abandoned her, leaving her with two other children; even so, she says it was a "painful" decision.

And painful it was, indeed. Next question to Ms Michelman: "Was your aborted child a little boy or a little girl?"

[Mr. Blonde]

Am I mistaken or isn't the law the Alito voted to uphold only for notification? And also isn't there an exclusion for those who cannot reach their husbands?

[mosquitobite]

I hate the intentional confusion of "notification" and "consent". I HATE IT!

[Congressman Billybob]

Joe Sobran usually does his homework on his stories. So, it is surprising to see him make a major mistake in taking this abortionists word for a false statement.

The Pennsylvania law that Judge Alito was ruling on, requited NOTICE to the husband, with some exceptions including the husband being gone. It did NOT require the CONSENT of the husband. This is a critical lie that the abortionists falsely claim, which needs to be attacked as a lie whenever it appears.

Congressman Billybob

Latest column: "Lord of the Fires (French Riots, Day 13)"

[cubreporter]

Abortion is murder. AIM

Abortion is KILLING AIK (like ache)


Abortion is what it is. MURDER.

[colorcountry]

This could have been my story, two children, pregnant and abandoned....EXCEPT I bore my son (my third child.) It was the best CHOICE if my life!

[lady lawyer]

In order to do an abortion, you have to kill more than the developing child. You first have to kill that precious part of a woman that -- more than anything else -- wants to protect her babies.