Am I mistaken or isn't the law the Alito voted to uphold only for notification? And also isn't there an exclusion for those who cannot reach their husbands?
PSST: What the libs fail to get (or refuse to admit) is that Alito's ruling had nothing to do with abortion notification...he upheld the right of the legislature of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania to establish this law.
This is how the people speak their views on the law. Through their own legislatures. Not through unelected judges. (Except for Roe vs Wade, of course)
In other words, this case came before Alito as a states' rights issue. Not an abortion issue. Note that libs have already begun trashing judges who strictly adhere to the Constitution regarding state's rights. Libs hate state's rights. Too much chance for the "wrong" people to be heard.