Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/14/2005 6:03:44 AM PST by Clive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Great Dane; Alberta's Child; headsonpikes; coteblanche; Ryle; albertabound; mitchbert; ...
This article appeared at the same time as an article by Eric Margolis entitled "Bush faces crisis ..."

It is my policy to never post a Margolis column.

2 posted on 11/14/2005 6:05:41 AM PST by Clive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clive
But none of this matter to the angry left, who seem ever-ready to betray America's interests to the hordes who remain sworn enemies of freedom.

The minds of the Democratic party leadership are filled with rocks.

They will destroy themselves to a chorus of heavenly hallelujahs.

They are lovers of power and the lust for such rather than lovers of truth.

4 posted on 11/14/2005 6:11:40 AM PST by A message
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clive

Great article.


5 posted on 11/14/2005 6:17:04 AM PST by jveritas (The Axis of Defeatism: Left wing liberals, Buchananites, and third party voters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clive
No matter what the Left will forever insist the President Bush lied about WMD.

That is because they chose to defend the disgraced Clinton who took the oath with his hand on the Holy Bible in an American court of law and lied through his teeth.

Their only defense was that he lied about sex but the truth is when you take the oath in a court of law you don't get to decide what you are allowed to lie about. The Judge makes a ruling and when you are instructed to answer to MUST tell the truth.

Add to that Clinton was President and took an oath to uphold our laws and then he goes and lies under oath, that is extremely disgraceful. On the scale of national disgrace nobody come close in the history of the US to Clinton. Even Benedict Arnold false a bit short of what Clinton did because Arnold was not the President. Nixon? He resigned in disgrace but never lied under oath in a court of law.

So all this crapheaded hysterics about President Bush having lied about WMD is just how the Left is desperately cover their own historical disgrace.

Their friends in the media have done a very good job of coving up the historical disgrace otherwise both Clinton's would (as the should) be toast by now. But in the long run the Left will lose and history will judge President Bush to have been 100% correct about Iraq, while Clinton will eventually wear the full burden of his disgrace, especially when Hillary loses badly in her bid to be President again (she was the one who was really running Bill's Administration, she made all the appointments and promotions).
6 posted on 11/14/2005 6:25:00 AM PST by Berlin_Freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clive
I had to laugh at Steve Roberts this morning. He's bloviating on WABC radio.

Said the President should take his advice and become a moderate because that's what the people want. Said the President should not be trying to please the conservatives.

Oh, I am sure Dubya is dying to hear more from Roberts and his ilk.

7 posted on 11/14/2005 6:28:43 AM PST by OldFriend (The Dems enABLEd DANGER and 3,000 Americans died.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clive

The left thinks that if they use the media enough with the same old, same old they can make everyone forget about their own previous positions on issues such as Clinton's Iraqi Regime Change Resolution. The WMD charge should not be about whether Saddam had them but when did they manage to hide them or destroy them? Everyone knew he had them because he used much of them on his own people and they remained unaccounted for when the UN tried to collect and destroy the rest. The Rats better be careful because the media will turn on them also when the stories runs out of steam.


8 posted on 11/14/2005 6:35:27 AM PST by tobyhill (The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clive
Neither facts nor history seem to matter to its current leadership, which has focused on ideology wrapped in layers of resentment and hate directed at Bush.

Actually it is precisely facts and history which are pounding liberalism into oblivion. The media initially distorts, then the truth creeps out from the fog.

The left's ideological underpinning cannot support the weight of evidence against it. Their most sacrosanct tenets are refuted daily by events. They must believe their own lies to survive, but soon the house of cards will fall.

Fact: the Main-stream Media, both broadcast and print, are bleeding customers profusely. Meanwhile talk radio, the internet, and Fox News flourish.

9 posted on 11/14/2005 6:49:51 AM PST by wayoverontheright (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clive
The left's fantasies? But I thought they were the reality-based community!
10 posted on 11/14/2005 7:52:58 AM PST by RightWingAtheist (Free the Crevo Three!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clive

This guy can see things more clearly from outside of the country. You're right pal, it is only in the small rat brain.


11 posted on 11/14/2005 10:08:05 AM PST by jmaroneps37 (Everything points to it so why not call them the Whigs?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson