Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Atheist to sue over 'In God We Trust' on money
www.volunteertv.com ^ | 11/13/05

Posted on 11/13/2005 6:11:40 PM PST by Ellesu

SACRAMENTO, Calif. The atheist who's spent years trying to ban recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance in public schools says he'll file a new lawsuit this week.

Michael Newdow says he'll ask a federal court to order removal of the national motto "In God We Trust" from U-S coins and currency. He says it violates the religious rights of atheists who belong to his "First Amendment Church of True Science."

The church's "three suggestions" are "question, be honest and do what's right." Newdow says it wouldn't be right to take up a collection when the money says "In God We Trust."

Last year, the Supreme Court dismissed Newdow's lawsuit over the words "under God" in the Pledge of Allegiance because he doesn't have custody of his daughter, in whose name the lawsuit was filed.

Newdow has resurrected that case by filing an identical lawsuit on behalf of two families.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: atheists; culturewars; ingodwetrust; lawsuit; michaelnewdow; motto; newdow; pleasedo; purge; scum
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-170 next last
To: Howie66

Actually, I hope this gets enough publicity that the next POTUS candidates will have to go on record how they feel about it...

Newdow is just full of himself and is like a gnat buzzing everyone's heads...but, let's look on the positive side ..and use this as an opportunity for Hillary and others to "cast their vote" for God in our country, or not.


21 posted on 11/13/2005 6:20:44 PM PST by Txsleuth (I am the real TXSLEUTH...please freepmail me if you doubt it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Ellesu
I object to the government funding scientific research because it could be construed to favor the religion "First Amendment Church of True Science". I'm also offended by all school science classes.
22 posted on 11/13/2005 6:20:52 PM PST by Farmerbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ellesu; SJackson

BTTT


23 posted on 11/13/2005 6:20:54 PM PST by Fiddlstix (Tagline Repair Service. Let us fix those broken Taglines. Inquire within(Presented by TagLines R US))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ellesu

Newdow needs an attitude adjustment.


24 posted on 11/13/2005 6:21:39 PM PST by sgtbono2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ellesu

I'll bet the @sshole is even offended by my D O G


25 posted on 11/13/2005 6:21:50 PM PST by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ellesu

His church needs to be abolished. Their beliefs offend me.


26 posted on 11/13/2005 6:23:28 PM PST by SealSeven (Moving at the speed of dark.... Even "nothing" takes up space.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ellesu
Now Michael Newdow is trying to get our currency declared unconstitutional? That's as surprising as learning the sun rises in the east in the morning.

(Denny Crane: "I Don't Want To Socialize With A Pinko Liberal Democrat Commie.Say What You Like About Republicans. We Stick To Our Convictions. Even When We Know We're Dead Wrong.")

27 posted on 11/13/2005 6:23:30 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GreenHornet
So, how does he plan to pay his lawyer?

Obviously, his lawyer doesn't suffer from the same hangups as his client...

28 posted on 11/13/2005 6:24:03 PM PST by Experiment 6-2-6 (Admn Mods: tiny, malicious things that glare and gibber from dark corners.They have pins and dolls..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: GreenHornet

Like he pays everything -- with Soros' money, of course!


29 posted on 11/13/2005 6:25:21 PM PST by JennysCool (Non-Y2K-Compliant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Ellesu

Maybe Michael should just stop using our money then. That would solve one of his problems.


30 posted on 11/13/2005 6:26:37 PM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Farmerbob

Well done!!!


31 posted on 11/13/2005 6:26:59 PM PST by uptoolate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: JennysCool

I don't know if that is true, but it would fit in with what Soros is doing.


32 posted on 11/13/2005 6:27:28 PM PST by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Ellesu

As most egotistical zealots always do, Newdow has gone over the edge. He will be laughed out of town on this one.


33 posted on 11/13/2005 6:27:54 PM PST by sageb1 (This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145
Last time I made a comment about Newdow, I received a
Comment Removed by Moderator

Newdow is a puke.

34 posted on 11/13/2005 6:28:01 PM PST by DumpsterDiver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth

Newdow is a POS that should have had his worthless tail kicked on a daily basis when he was a kid.

More likely than not, his "Daddy" was some worthless POS slimeball that was henpecked to the max by his old lady.


35 posted on 11/13/2005 6:28:48 PM PST by Howie66 ("America will never seek a permission slip to defend the security of our people.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: MonroeDNA

Remember when law suits were about Justice?


36 posted on 11/13/2005 6:30:57 PM PST by GregoTX (The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Ellesu


Judicial activism run amok
Posted: June 28, 2002



On June 26, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit struck again.


snip



Michael Newdow is a minister of atheism, ordained by the Universal Life Church. He says he will soon open his own church, the First Amendment Church of True Science, on the Internet. His daughter attends public elementary school in California. Under state law and school district policy, teachers begin each school day leading their students in the Pledge of Allegiance. They use the script first codified by Congress in 1942 and amended in 1954 by adding the words "under God."

Mr. Newdow objects to these two words. He does not object to his daughter being compelled to say them, because participation in the pledge is voluntary. He objects that his daughter must "watch and listen" to the words said by her classmates. His daughter exercising her freedom not to participate renders others exercising their right to participate an "establishment of religion" forbidden by the First Amendment.

He argued that the 1954 statute adding the "G" word to the pledge is unconstitutional. He wanted a federal judge to order the president to "repeal" the pledge by removing the offending words. (Note to Mr. Newdow: Just like you can't read the Constitution's First Amendment, you can't read its Articles I and II. The president cannot repeal a statute passed by Congress). He also wanted a federal judge to order Congress to remove the words. (Another note to Mr. Newdow: Read that Constitution some more, this time Article III – courts can't order Congress to pass legislation).


snip


This isn't the first time Mr. Newdow has gone to court attacking other people's freedom of religious speech. The Sacramento Bee reports that Mr. Newdow filed suit against President Bush after Rev. Franklin Graham's invocation at the 2000 presidential inauguration ceremony. When that suit got tossed out, Mr. Newdow then tried to sue Sen. Mitch McConnell, then-chairman of the committee in charge of the 2000 inaugural.


http://tinyurl.com/ahjay


37 posted on 11/13/2005 6:31:15 PM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ellesu

As a very proud atheist (flame me at will I don't care about that either), the words that seriously offend me on the greenback are the ones that say "This note is legal tender for all debts, public and private", which, in conjunction with the absence of the words "Redeemable in Gold / Silver", amounts to a very huge affront to my trust and intelligence.


38 posted on 11/13/2005 6:32:04 PM PST by kcar (The UNsucks.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ellesu

Michael Newdow: "Look at me!"


39 posted on 11/13/2005 6:32:40 PM PST by Clemenza (In League with the Freemasons, The Bilderbergers, and the Learned Elders of Zion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ellesu

Michael Newdow is more annoying than a wedgie.


40 posted on 11/13/2005 6:32:45 PM PST by old_sage_says
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-170 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson