Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Grandmother, 32, faces fake AMBER Alert charge
Muskegon Chronicle ^ | 11-11-05 | Lisa Medendorp

Posted on 11/13/2005 5:36:10 PM PST by Dan from Michigan

Grandmother, 32, faces fake AMBER Alert charge Friday, November 11, 2005

A 32-year-old Muskegon Township woman has been charged with a misdemeanor after her report of a missing baby and teenage mother -- which resulted in an AMBER Alert Tuesday night -- was proven to be false, authorities say.

Christina Faith Petrongelli, of 2535 Friendship Lane, may have been afraid state welfare inspectors were going to take her granddaughter away because of recurring care problems, authorities said.

She was arraigned Wednesday before 60th District Judge Andrew Wierengo III and is free on a $1,000 personal recognizance bond. Technically, the charge is "making a false report of the commission of a misdemeanor -- interference with a (Family) Court custody order."

(Excerpt) Read more at mlive.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; US: Michigan
KEYWORDS: amberalert; fraud; gilf; sterilizethem
A Grandmother at 32???
1 posted on 11/13/2005 5:36:11 PM PST by Dan from Michigan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan

Way to go there, Granny.


2 posted on 11/13/2005 5:37:13 PM PST by SIDENET ("IT'S A COOKBOOK!!!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan

16 + 16


3 posted on 11/13/2005 5:37:37 PM PST by Tax-chick (I'm not being paid enough to worry about all this stuff ... so I don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan

I never went to a pro football game until I was 32 - I have not been living!


4 posted on 11/13/2005 5:37:51 PM PST by Senator Pardek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan

A new generation Every 16 Years!


5 posted on 11/13/2005 5:38:02 PM PST by H. Paul Pressler IV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan

15-16 year old kids having kids, then kids having kids. My ex's oldest sis was a grandmother at 32.


6 posted on 11/13/2005 5:38:50 PM PST by mathluv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: H. Paul Pressler IV
A new generation Every 16 Years!

She'll be a great-grandmother at 48!

7 posted on 11/13/2005 5:39:52 PM PST by SIDENET ("IT'S A COOKBOOK!!!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SIDENET

I was not even a father at 32.


8 posted on 11/13/2005 5:40:56 PM PST by H. Paul Pressler IV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan

The apple evidently doesn't fall far from the tree.


9 posted on 11/13/2005 5:44:20 PM PST by L98Fiero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan
Just think, if the 7th kid in the line lives to be 96, they can have a family portrait with baby, mother, grandmother, great grandmother, great-great grandmother, great-great-great grandmother and great-great-great-great grandmother.

All on welfare, no fathers, of course...... just your all-around great American family in the greatest nation on this great planet Earth.

Leni

10 posted on 11/13/2005 5:48:22 PM PST by MinuteGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinuteGal

Assuming none are in prison.


11 posted on 11/13/2005 7:02:11 PM PST by ncountylee (Dead terrorists smell like victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan

I wasn't a MOTHER until I was 32!


12 posted on 11/13/2005 7:05:01 PM PST by mombonn (¡Viva Bush/Cheney!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mombonn

33 here.


13 posted on 11/13/2005 7:13:52 PM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan

Sounds like the last town we lived in. I had to double check to make sure it wasn't.


14 posted on 11/13/2005 7:15:07 PM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ncountylee

You mean, assuming they don't all get assigned to the same prison.


15 posted on 11/13/2005 8:02:02 PM PST by thoughtomator (Bring Back HCUA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan

32! Sheesh. I was just getting in high gear at 32.


16 posted on 11/14/2005 4:37:04 AM PST by OpusatFR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan
...may have been afraid state welfare inspectors were going to take her granddaughter away

Definition: welfare check in danger of being reduced.

17 posted on 11/14/2005 4:39:59 AM PST by pageonetoo (Rush probably broke the law, but it's OK. WE love our MajaRushie, and we can't think for ourselves!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: L98Fiero
The apple evidently doesn't fall far from the tree.

But it does fall quickly.

18 posted on 11/14/2005 4:41:10 AM PST by SlowBoat407 (The best stuff happens just before the thread snaps.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: pageonetoo
Definition: welfare check in danger of being reduced.

Or eliminated. An able-bodied woman with no young children to care for can be sent to McDonalds

19 posted on 11/14/2005 4:43:07 AM PST by SauronOfMordor (I do what the voices in lazamataz's head tell me to)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson