To: TrailofTears
I guess then evolution is still a supposition based upon something not able to be observed etc.
If evolution were nothing more than supposition then it would not be a "theory". If you don't understand the significance of the word "theory" in a scientific context then you are not qualified to make comments on the issue.
So then what we have is both sides giving theories of origins.
No, we have one side that has a scientific theory and another side that has logical fallacies rooted in mysticism.
455 posted on
11/15/2005 6:32:12 AM PST by
Dimensio
(http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
To: Dimensio
...another side that has logical fallacies rooted in mysticism. Got a link to these documented cases?
463 posted on
11/15/2005 9:20:57 AM PST by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going....)
To: Dimensio
Funny how everyone who embraces evolution refuses to acknowledge that they are following a religion of secularism. They are a state sponsored "belief" monopoly. They hate the arena of ideas mainly because they lose everytime they are confronted with the truth.
571 posted on
11/17/2005 4:08:26 PM PST by
TrailofTears
(."We mock loyalty and are shocked at finding traitors in our midst." CS Lewis)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson