Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sruleoflaw
"1) The Republicans, who are blocking America from using the 10.4 billion barrels of oil in ANWR"

There is nothing in the bill to insure that the oil recovered in the ANWR will be sold only on the U.S. markets! The oil companies will sell said oil on the international oil market to maximize their profits as demanded by their shareholders.

It is estimated by U.S. government energy dept. agencies that it will be ten years until any oil from the refuge will be available on any market.

8 posted on 11/11/2005 10:11:58 PM PST by Rabble (Just When is John F sKerry going to release his USNR military records ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Rabble

Your solution then is to roll over?

I'm not wired that way, I prefer to join the battle.

Patton would have made an example of a coward like you.

TT


9 posted on 11/11/2005 10:25:23 PM PST by TexasTransplant (NEMO ME IMPUNE LACESSET)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Rabble
It is estimated by U.S. government energy dept. agencies that it will be ten years until any oil from the refuge will be available on any market.

Better get started then.

10 posted on 11/11/2005 10:42:18 PM PST by paul51 (11 September 2001 - Never forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Rabble
There is nothing in the bill to insure that the oil recovered in the ANWR will be sold only on the U.S. markets!

The sentate just passed a bill sponsored by Wyden that requires the oil from ANWR to be sold in US markets.

But the Senate adopted an amendment offered by James M. Talent (R-Mo.) and Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) that bans exports of any oil produced in ANWR by a vote of 83-16.

http://ogj.pennnet.com/articles/article_display.cfm?Section=ONART&C=GenIn&ARTICLE_ID=240660&p=7

13 posted on 11/11/2005 11:53:06 PM PST by double_down
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Rabble

"It is estimated by U.S. government energy dept. agencies that it will be ten years until any oil from the refuge will be available on any market."

Yes, and it was proposed over 10 years ago and the oil could have been flowing this very day.

Moreover, to start drilling would have a psychological impact on OPEC - in a positive way for us.


14 posted on 11/11/2005 11:58:17 PM PST by American in Singapore (Who needs Comedy Central when we have liberals?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Rabble

So what if it takes 10 years before we get our first oil from ANWR. If Clinton hadn't vetoed this measure in 1995, we would have oil flowing from ANWR today -- more than 1 million barrels per day, ENOUGH to cover what we lost during Katrina.

You are wrong on the issue of where the oil will go. "The oil won't necessarily go to the U.S." story is an old yarn. Some people used to claim the North Slope oil went to Japan. That was bunk. About 90-95 percent of the North Slope oil went to the U.S. and I assume you didn't hear about the amendment added to the ANWR legislation not to sell the oil abroad.


18 posted on 11/12/2005 7:32:23 AM PST by sruleoflaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson