Skip to comments.
U.S. Internet Control Annoys Nations
The Tampa Tribune ^
| 11/11/05
| MATT MOORE
Posted on 11/11/2005 2:06:43 PM PST by DogBarkTree
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 next last
To: DogBarkTree
"many of the countries most eager to impose international control also have bad records on free speech issues, political prisoners."Exactly. We are doing this right and the UN or some international commission cannot be relied upon.
To: DogBarkTree
>U.S. Internet Control Annoys Nations
To: DogBarkTree
"The reasons for resentment of U.S. control are numerous, beginning with objections to U.S. foreign policy." AND, THAT'S the VERY reason we SHOULD MAINTAIN CONTROL!!!
23
posted on
11/11/2005 2:25:29 PM PST
by
goodnesswins
(DEMS....40 yrs and $$$dollars for the War on Poverty, but NOT a $$ or minute for the WAR on Terror!)
To: DogBarkTree
Are there a lot of computer users in the Third World?
24
posted on
11/11/2005 2:28:30 PM PST
by
GSWarrior
(Proudly posting bandwidth-consuming images since November 2000.)
To: Hank Rearden
bang on
assholes
who developed it?
whats the meaning of intellectual property?
rentals, leases and taxes
To: DogBarkTree
Remind me again why we let them use our internet?
26
posted on
11/11/2005 2:32:43 PM PST
by
AntiGuv
(™)
To: DogBarkTree
Ya beat me to it. If the Dems are sad, I am happy. If the thugs at the UN are sad, I am happy. If the Euroweenies and their buddies are sad, I am happy.
Gosh. Life should be so easy.
27
posted on
11/11/2005 2:33:16 PM PST
by
rlmorel
("Innocence seldom utters outraged shrieks. Guilt does." Whittaker Chambers)
To: DogBarkTree
What critics seek varies and remains in many cases vague. Socialists like vague regulations. I don't.
28
posted on
11/11/2005 2:34:05 PM PST
by
conservatism_IS_compassion
(The idea around which liberalism coheres is that NOTHING actually matters but PR.)
To: DogBarkTree
Shut them down for awhile. See how appreciative they are to get it back. Problem solved, customer happy.
Next!
29
posted on
11/11/2005 2:35:07 PM PST
by
muir_redwoods
(Free Sirhan Sirhan, after all, the bastard who killed Mary Jo Kopechne is walking around free)
To: DogBarkTree
U.S. Internet Control Annoys Nations
30
posted on
11/11/2005 2:35:35 PM PST
by
Paul_Denton
(The U.S. should adopt the policy of Oom Shmoom: Israeli policy where no one gives a sh*t about U.N.)
To: DogBarkTree
Why don't they just make their own Internet? This one is ours. I have no problem with the EU forming their own.
31
posted on
11/11/2005 2:36:06 PM PST
by
Porterville
(Pray for War- Spanish by birth, American by the Grace of God!!!)
To: AntiGuv
Remind me again why we let them use our internet? And, what are we charging them?
32
posted on
11/11/2005 2:36:12 PM PST
by
polymuser
(")
To: DogBarkTree
"Unilateral control by the U.S. government would be very sad," EU spokesman Martin Selmayr said. "They just have to give up their unilateral control and everything will be fine."
What the hell does this clown mean by WOULD BE?
What IS....IS.
If Bubba taught us anyting, its what is...is.
To: DogBarkTree
Does the US Gummint control the Internet or even domain name extensions? That's the problem with these third-world democracies: they see either their neighborhood mafioso or Gummint. They have no idea how capitalism works.
34
posted on
11/11/2005 2:37:09 PM PST
by
RightWhale
(Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
To: DogBarkTree
We would be fools to lose control of the internet. That is why the left will probably demand that we do.
35
posted on
11/11/2005 2:37:55 PM PST
by
Old Seadog
(Inside every old person is a young person saying "WTF happened?".)
To: jackson29
>who developed it? whats the meaning of intellectual property? rentals, leases and taxes
Who DEVELOPED and
BUILT the oil fields that OPEC
became OPEC with?
To: Dead Corpse
yeah and I say that we send them Al Gore to help!
37
posted on
11/11/2005 2:39:52 PM PST
by
socialismisinsidious
(Liberals are all about choice UNTIL you choose differently than them.)
To: DogBarkTree
The worldwide network was born on U.S. shores, but that matters little to the growing number of nations now demanding shared control. Our oil supply is on other shores.... I demand shared control!!!
(crickets)
:)
38
posted on
11/11/2005 2:43:46 PM PST
by
MamaTexan
(It's amazing how many people don't understand the difference between the 'legal' system and the LAW!)
To: DogBarkTree
by all means, feel free to design and build something better any time you wish... you useless eaters you!!!
39
posted on
11/11/2005 2:44:44 PM PST
by
Chode
(American Hedonist ©®)
To: DogBarkTree
The way I see it, the next Democrat president (and, sadly, there will eventually come a day) will give the Internet to the world and it was be ruined beyond recognition.
However, realizing how bad it has become, a group of entrepeneurs will create the next paradigm, a new "internet", and the U.S. will migrate to that, leaving that old crappy internet to the rest of the world, who will soon be complaining for a Piece of the Action.
TS
40
posted on
11/11/2005 2:53:11 PM PST
by
Tanniker Smith
(By defiintion, we cannot have Consensus until you agree with me.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson