Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Internet Control Annoys Nations
The Tampa Tribune ^ | 11/11/05 | MATT MOORE

Posted on 11/11/2005 2:06:43 PM PST by DogBarkTree

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last
To: DogBarkTree
"many of the countries most eager to impose international control also have bad records on free speech issues, political prisoners."

Exactly. We are doing this right and the UN or some international commission cannot be relied upon.

21 posted on 11/11/2005 2:23:19 PM PST by mark502inf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DogBarkTree
>U.S. Internet Control Annoys Nations


22 posted on 11/11/2005 2:25:15 PM PST by theFIRMbss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DogBarkTree
"The reasons for resentment of U.S. control are numerous, beginning with objections to U.S. foreign policy."

AND, THAT'S the VERY reason we SHOULD MAINTAIN CONTROL!!!

23 posted on 11/11/2005 2:25:29 PM PST by goodnesswins (DEMS....40 yrs and $$$dollars for the War on Poverty, but NOT a $$ or minute for the WAR on Terror!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DogBarkTree

Are there a lot of computer users in the Third World?


24 posted on 11/11/2005 2:28:30 PM PST by GSWarrior (Proudly posting bandwidth-consuming images since November 2000.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hank Rearden

bang on

assholes

who developed it?
whats the meaning of intellectual property?
rentals, leases and taxes


25 posted on 11/11/2005 2:30:47 PM PST by jackson29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: DogBarkTree

Remind me again why we let them use our internet?


26 posted on 11/11/2005 2:32:43 PM PST by AntiGuv (™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DogBarkTree

Ya beat me to it. If the Dems are sad, I am happy. If the thugs at the UN are sad, I am happy. If the Euroweenies and their buddies are sad, I am happy.

Gosh. Life should be so easy.


27 posted on 11/11/2005 2:33:16 PM PST by rlmorel ("Innocence seldom utters outraged shrieks. Guilt does." Whittaker Chambers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DogBarkTree
What critics seek varies and remains in many cases vague.
Socialists like vague regulations. I don't.

28 posted on 11/11/2005 2:34:05 PM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion (The idea around which liberalism coheres is that NOTHING actually matters but PR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DogBarkTree
Shut them down for awhile. See how appreciative they are to get it back. Problem solved, customer happy.

Next!

29 posted on 11/11/2005 2:35:07 PM PST by muir_redwoods (Free Sirhan Sirhan, after all, the bastard who killed Mary Jo Kopechne is walking around free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DogBarkTree
U.S. Internet Control Annoys Nations


30 posted on 11/11/2005 2:35:35 PM PST by Paul_Denton (The U.S. should adopt the policy of Oom Shmoom: Israeli policy where no one gives a sh*t about U.N.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DogBarkTree

Why don't they just make their own Internet? This one is ours. I have no problem with the EU forming their own.


31 posted on 11/11/2005 2:36:06 PM PST by Porterville (Pray for War- Spanish by birth, American by the Grace of God!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv
Remind me again why we let them use our internet?

And, what are we charging them?

32 posted on 11/11/2005 2:36:12 PM PST by polymuser (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: DogBarkTree

"Unilateral control by the U.S. government would be very sad," EU spokesman Martin Selmayr said. "They just have to give up their unilateral control and everything will be fine."

What the hell does this clown mean by WOULD BE?

What IS....IS.

If Bubba taught us anyting, its what is...is.


33 posted on 11/11/2005 2:36:25 PM PST by Bob from De
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DogBarkTree

Does the US Gummint control the Internet or even domain name extensions? That's the problem with these third-world democracies: they see either their neighborhood mafioso or Gummint. They have no idea how capitalism works.


34 posted on 11/11/2005 2:37:09 PM PST by RightWhale (Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DogBarkTree
Image hosted by TinyPic.com
We would be fools to lose control of the internet. That is why the left will probably demand that we do.
35 posted on 11/11/2005 2:37:55 PM PST by Old Seadog (Inside every old person is a young person saying "WTF happened?".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jackson29
>who developed it? whats the meaning of intellectual property? rentals, leases and taxes

Who DEVELOPED and
BUILT the oil fields that OPEC
became OPEC with?

36 posted on 11/11/2005 2:38:06 PM PST by theFIRMbss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse

yeah and I say that we send them Al Gore to help!


37 posted on 11/11/2005 2:39:52 PM PST by socialismisinsidious (Liberals are all about choice UNTIL you choose differently than them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DogBarkTree
The worldwide network was born on U.S. shores, but that matters little to the growing number of nations now demanding shared control.

Our oil supply is on other shores.... I demand shared control!!!

(crickets)

:)

38 posted on 11/11/2005 2:43:46 PM PST by MamaTexan (It's amazing how many people don't understand the difference between the 'legal' system and the LAW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DogBarkTree
Image hosted by Photobucket.com by all means, feel free to design and build something better any time you wish... you useless eaters you!!!
39 posted on 11/11/2005 2:44:44 PM PST by Chode (American Hedonist ©®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DogBarkTree
The way I see it, the next Democrat president (and, sadly, there will eventually come a day) will give the Internet to the world and it was be ruined beyond recognition.

However, realizing how bad it has become, a group of entrepeneurs will create the next paradigm, a new "internet", and the U.S. will migrate to that, leaving that old crappy internet to the rest of the world, who will soon be complaining for a Piece of the Action.

TS

40 posted on 11/11/2005 2:53:11 PM PST by Tanniker Smith (By defiintion, we cannot have Consensus until you agree with me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson