Skip to comments.
Bush Should Run for a Fourth Term
November 11, 2005
Posted on 11/11/2005 7:00:22 AM PST by new yorker 77
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 next last
To: new yorker 77
2
posted on
11/11/2005 7:00:57 AM PST
by
Calpernia
(Breederville.com)
To: new yorker 77
"Liberals are making a huge mistake if they think President Bush will be the death of the GOP in 2006."
No. What will be the death of the GOP in '06 will be if they don't learn to start cutting spending and taxes - along with all the other stuff they were put into office to do.
To: new yorker 77
4th term??
Is this "new" math?
4
posted on
11/11/2005 7:04:30 AM PST
by
wallcrawlr
(http://www.bionicear.com)
To: new yorker 77
All politics is loco..........
5
posted on
11/11/2005 7:04:37 AM PST
by
Red Badger
(Whatever happened to formulas 1 through 408?.........)
To: new yorker 77
Liberals are making a huge mistake if they think President Bush will be the death of the GOP in 2006. The GOP House and Senate members are hurting themselves plenty without any help from the President.
6
posted on
11/11/2005 7:05:04 AM PST
by
SIDENET
("IT'S A COOKBOOK!!!")
To: new yorker 77
Considering the DUmbass leftist neo-hippies say that he didn't really win in 2000 or 04, then do we have a claim that President Bush was never 'elected' for his two terms and through a legal technicality can run again? Now that would really piss off some people..
7
posted on
11/11/2005 7:07:30 AM PST
by
mnehring
(My Karma ran over your Dogma)
To: SIDENET
Who set the agenda for the GOP House and the GOP Senators in 2002?
President Bush
8
posted on
11/11/2005 7:10:35 AM PST
by
new yorker 77
(FAKE POLLS DO NOT TRANSLATE INTO REAL VOTERS!)
To: new yorker 77
Pretty accurate. Bush has been running for President since 2000 because he has had two wars to fight, the one in Iraq and the one in the US.
9
posted on
11/11/2005 7:10:57 AM PST
by
Toespi
To: new yorker 77
Rumors of his death have been greatly exaggerated
10
posted on
11/11/2005 7:11:12 AM PST
by
truemiester
(If the U.S. should fail, a veil of darkness will come over the Earth for a thousand years)
To: libertarianPA
Yep. A bunch of Republicans that act like Democrats is the quickest way to turn off your base.
11
posted on
11/11/2005 7:11:30 AM PST
by
Blood of Tyrants
(G-d is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
To: Blood of Tyrants
What was the feeling of Republicans in 2001?
The new tone moderation made us all cringe.
As a conservative, it helps to look back to learn how to move forward.
We were here in 2001.
Replay the 2002 model and win.
12
posted on
11/11/2005 7:13:33 AM PST
by
new yorker 77
(FAKE POLLS DO NOT TRANSLATE INTO REAL VOTERS!)
To: libertarianPA
By running, he sets the agenda.
He did this in 2002 after a miserable 2001 for the GOP.
Conservatives do not cower and whine and give up.
We consolidate and win.
13
posted on
11/11/2005 7:15:36 AM PST
by
new yorker 77
(FAKE POLLS DO NOT TRANSLATE INTO REAL VOTERS!)
To: new yorker 77
14
posted on
11/11/2005 7:18:16 AM PST
by
antaresequity
(PUSH 1 FOR ENGLISH, PUSH 2 TO BE DEPORTED...)
To: SIDENET
If President Bush did not correct the pattern of GOP House members and a GOP Senate in 2001 going into 2002, he would have lost a bid at getting back the Senate and may have lost the House.
How would he have done on tax cuts, judges, and the war if he had to work with Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle, and House Majority Leader Pelosi.
Without tax cuts, jobs would have been nonexistent. He would have been given his father's label and would have lost in 2004.
Bush won re-election in 2004 by winning in 2002.
He can solidify his final three years by winning in 2006.
15
posted on
11/11/2005 7:19:58 AM PST
by
new yorker 77
(FAKE POLLS DO NOT TRANSLATE INTO REAL VOTERS!)
To: new yorker 77
"Conservatives do not cower and whine and give up"
No. They pull budget cutting bills because members of their own party were (ready for this?) upset about the proposed drilling in ANWAR, tax cuts, Medicare cuts, and cuts in social programs!
This is your GOP today. And if I were you, I wouldn't be so confident. If this keeps up, and I see no reason it shouldn't, my votes are going strictly to the Libertarians next year. Why should I waste my vote on Democrats in Republican clothing?
To: new yorker 77
Bush Should Run for a Fourth Term I'll wait and see how he does in his third term before I make a decision.
17
posted on
11/11/2005 7:22:37 AM PST
by
ActionNewsBill
("In times of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act")
To: new yorker 77
He set it, and THEY refused to push it!
LLS
18
posted on
11/11/2005 7:23:31 AM PST
by
LibLieSlayer
(Preserve America... kill terrorists... destroy dims!)
To: libertarianPA
You are ignorant to history.
GOP moderates pulled this kind of garbage in 2001.
It wasn't until the Bush White House reigned in all Republicans to a common agenda for 2002 that we turned it around.
You should not be a reactionary liberal.
You should be a focused conservative.
Contact the RNC, the White House, and GOP leaders. They will put pressure on these moderates.
2005 feels and smells like 2001,. Even the elections in Virginia and New Jersey are the same.
Focused Conservatives are better than Fretting Conservatives.
19
posted on
11/11/2005 7:24:37 AM PST
by
new yorker 77
(FAKE POLLS DO NOT TRANSLATE INTO REAL VOTERS!)
To: new yorker 77
Step number one:
Stop spending so much fn money.
20
posted on
11/11/2005 7:24:57 AM PST
by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson