Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rumsfeld Cites Progress Toward Iraqis Providing Their Own Security
American Forces Press Service ^ | Nov 10, 2005 | John D. Banusiewicz

Posted on 11/10/2005 4:25:06 PM PST by SandRat

WASHINGTON, Nov. 10, 2005 – People who wonder why it's taking so long for Iraqi security forces to become capable of providing for their nation's security need to look at what's happened since coalition forces toppled Saddam Hussein's regime, Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld said in a Nov. 8 radio interview. Speaking with Samir Nader on Voice of America's Radio SAWA, Rumsfeld pointed to the progress evident today in building Iraq's security forces from scratch.

"First of all, it's not taking so long," Rumsfeld said. "It's been two and a half years, and we've gone from zero to 210,000 Iraqi security forces trained and equipped. They are every day and every week taking over more and more responsibility for the security in the country."

Recent operations near the Syrian border in Iraq's Anbar province have involved a large number of Iraqi forces, the secretary added. He also noted that Iraqis provided almost all of the security for the country's Oct. 15 constitutional referendum and will do the same for the Dec. 15 parliamentary election.

"They're getting bigger and better equipped and better trained and more professional every single day, and as a result, they're taking over more and more responsibilities every day," Rumsfeld said.

The secretary expressed optimism about the upcoming parliamentary election and its aftermath.

"I think that what we will have seen is three elections in less than one year," he said. "Each one will be successful. I would guess there will be a higher turnout on Dec. 15 than in any of the previous two. We'll see the Sunnis participating to a greater extent."

The election of a popularly chosen, representative government, he said, will send a clear message to the Iraqi people and to insurgents bent on derailing Iraq's progress toward democracy.

"I think that at that stage, it will be pretty clear to everyone in Iraq that anyone who is going out blowing up buildings and killing innocent Iraqi people (is) not opposing the coalition," Rumsfeld. "What they would be opposing is the Iraqi people and the Iraqi government and the Iraqi constitution. I don't think the Iraqi people are going to have a lot of tolerance for that kind of behavior, and I think they'll turn people in who do that, and I think we'll see a better environment post-election."

Rumsfeld warned of the likely consequences if people like fugitive Jordanian terrorist Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, the leader of al Qaeda in Iraq, were to gain control of the country.

"If Iraq were turned over to the terrorists, the Zarqawis, the people who chop off people's heads -- here's a country that's wealthy, it has oil, it has water, it has intelligent people, it has an important history -- it would be a disaster for that region," he said. "To the extent that Iraq is -- as I believe it will be in the period ahead -- a single country, at peace with its neighbors, that's democratic, respectful of all the different elements within it, it will have a transforming effect in the region, I believe.

"It will be a terrific thing for the world," the secretary said. "They are well on the path to achieve that."


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: cites; gnfi; iraqiarmy; iraqis; own; procoalition; progress; providing; rumsfeld; security; selfrule; toward
Transcript of Defense Secretary Rumsfeld's Radio SAWA Interview

Radio SAWA

1 posted on 11/10/2005 4:25:11 PM PST by SandRat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2LT Radix jr; 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub; 80 Square Miles; A Ruckus of Dogs; acad1228; AirForceMom; ..
OUCH!!!!

The alphabet Spews and DemonRATS aren't going to like this!

Naturally, they don't like anything unless they say it.

2 posted on 11/10/2005 4:26:26 PM PST by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat
OUCH!!!! The alphabet Spews and DemonRATS aren't going to like this!

Not to fear - it will never see the light of day in the MSM.

3 posted on 11/10/2005 4:42:04 PM PST by p23185 (Why isn't attempting to take down a sitting Pres & his Admin considered Sedition?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ducks1944; Ragtime Cowgirl; Alamo-Girl; TrueBeliever9; maestro; TEXOKIE; My back yard; djreece; ...
"First of all, it's not taking so long," Rumsfeld said. "It's been two and a half years, and we've gone from zero to 210,000 Iraqi security forces trained and equipped. They are every day and every week taking over more and more responsibility for the security in the country."

"They're getting bigger and better equipped and better trained and more professional every single day, and as a result, they're taking over more and more responsibilities every day," Rumsfeld said.

"I think that what we will have seen is three elections in less than one year," he said. "Each one will be successful. I would guess there will be a higher turnout on Dec. 15 than in any of the previous two. We'll see the Sunnis participating to a greater extent."

4 posted on 11/10/2005 6:51:49 PM PST by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia

Thanks for the ping!


5 posted on 11/10/2005 8:54:11 PM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

BTTT


6 posted on 11/11/2005 3:11:39 AM PST by E.G.C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia
Few things have better exemplified the media bia on Iraq than the reporting on Iraqi security forces. When our commanders briefed Congress on that issue last month they showed how in 20 months we had gone from 0 to 116 Iraqi battalions. 36 of them were now capable of taking the lead in operations and controllng their own area of responsibility; an increase from 23 in March.

Almost as an aside, it was mentioned that there was one battalion capable of completely independent ops, down from 3 in March. And that decrease in readiness in 2 battalions was the lead story on news shows and newspaper articles when the real story was the creation of over one hundred battalions and the increasing capability of dozens of them.

7 posted on 11/11/2005 3:20:29 AM PST by mark502inf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mark502inf


>>>>Few things have better exemplified the media bia on Iraq than the reporting on Iraqi security forces.

:)

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1518385/posts?page=126#126


8 posted on 11/11/2005 4:01:33 AM PST by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SandRat
.........he said. "To the extent that Iraq is -- as I believe it will be in the period ahead -- a single country, at peace with its neighbors, (My emphasis)

This is very telling and has been overlooked or at least, not referenced by the MSM. Rumsfeld is signaling that it is possible to have Iraq split up, which could happen sooner than later.

9 posted on 11/11/2005 4:25:14 AM PST by varon (Allegiance to the constitution, always. Allegiance to a political party, never.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mark502inf
When our commanders briefed Congress on that issue last month they showed how in 20 months we had gone from 0 to 116 Iraqi battalions

Interpretation: We have removed 116 battalions of potential insurgents by putting them in uniform and on our payroll.

Almost as an aside, it was mentioned that there was one battalion capable of completely independent ops, down from 3 in March.

We're making a public correction to inflated numbers to cover our a**es before any of us receives "early retirement"!

10 posted on 11/11/2005 4:37:50 AM PST by varon (Allegiance to the constitution, always. Allegiance to a political party, never.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: varon

11 posted on 11/11/2005 5:17:44 AM PST by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia
Image hosted by Photobucket.com
12 posted on 11/11/2005 7:08:54 AM PST by varon (Allegiance to the constitution, always. Allegiance to a political party, never.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: varon

Pfffffzzzzzt


13 posted on 11/11/2005 7:10:31 AM PST by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson