Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Generational war is brewing
Tracey Press ^ | 11/10/05 | Froma Harrop

Posted on 11/10/2005 1:22:46 PM PST by qam1

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 641-660661-680681-700 ... 741-746 next last
To: Marie

You know, your post #504, is really quite disgusting, and you seem like a bitter person...My parents are my biological parents, married in their early 20s, stayed married until the day my dad died, at which point they had been married for 45+ yrs, and in love with each other until the day they died...and I and my family, took care of them both at home, until they died...

And my husband and I have been married for 36+ yrs, and intend to stay married until we die..you see, we love each other...and we raised our boys, with the same love and attention we received from our parents...

Sorry that you are so very bitter, have wild nasty imaginings as to who my parents were, and what they did in life, and how they did their best to raise me and my brother..

You post, nasty as it is, reveals much about your state of bitterness, and frankly, I feel sorry for you, that you seem to get off, on ranting about something, and trying to denigrate people you know nothing about...you are truly disgusting...

Frankly, you are really gross, and out in left field, to insinuate that what advice I received from 'dad', might actually have been from the guy down the street, or some 'uncle' rather than from my own loving father....you soil his good name, with your insane rantings...

You are more than confused...you need to wash your mind out with soap...


661 posted on 11/11/2005 4:50:36 PM PST by andysandmikesmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 504 | View Replies]

To: AdamSelene235

Great map! Where's it from?


662 posted on 11/11/2005 4:53:46 PM PST by Kay Ludlow (Free market, but cautious about what I support with my dollars)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

Comment #663 Removed by Moderator

To: Marie

And now in your post #511, you almost compliment me, after such scathing rhetoric in your post #504...see now, I am confused...

I am very touchy about my parents...they were the best parents in the world..they loved each other madly, they loved me and my brother madly...and they worked so hard, and long, to provide for us, to discipline us, to make us into responsible adults...and when I read your post #504, well, frankly I was seething...

Because as they aged, dad was stricken with cancer, and mom got Alzheimers...and they both suffered, which seemed to unfair to such wonderful people...the only thing I could do, was take care of them and love them, because after all, they had taken care of me and loved me...I owed them everything...

So I am having a hard time reconciling your post #504 to me, with your post #511 to me...

Anyone who denigrates who my parents were, and how they conducted their lives, will find me a spitting tiger...

If I misunderstood you, I am sorry...

If not, well, my remarks stand..


664 posted on 11/11/2005 5:01:14 PM PST by andysandmikesmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 511 | View Replies]

To: GOP_1900AD
By 2015 our house will have been paid off for a few years and well have moved the cash flow we used to pay the mortgage into buying raw land with cold cash.

Sounds like a decent approach. I switched from a 30 year to a 15 year mortgage as a first step. Later, I decided to sell off some stock to pay off the mortgage. Now I only have property taxes to pay on my primary residence. In February I purchased another house using just my state/federal income tax refunds as cash out of pocket. I still need to rent the place out. I've been too busy to get that done. It will only generate about $100/month above the principal/interest/tax/insurance, but I can write off the interest/tax/insurance and the principal becomes equity.

My property taxes amount to $300/month. Even when you own a property "free and clear", you are still "renting" it from the government on pain of confiscation for non-payment of property taxes.

665 posted on 11/11/2005 5:03:04 PM PST by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 645 | View Replies]

To: willstayfree

I agree. Mainstream knew without a doubt we could win this conflict within months with Air Support instead of the mass casualties that went on and on with the ground troops.

I always wondered why we did not drop more naplam where it was needed to drive the VC from gaining presence twoards our troops.


666 posted on 11/11/2005 5:04:41 PM PST by laney (little bit country,little bit Rock and Roll!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 663 | View Replies]

To: laney
IMHO that is why we have an obese problem, it's so inexpensive to eat unhealthy processed foods, yet to eat healthy is not affordable to many households.

The obesity problem is principally caused by lack of proper exercise. Sitting in front of the TV set watching endless hours of trash or playing video games. Sitting in front of a computer surfing the net doesn't help much in the exercise department either.

How much exercise is enough? I personally pared off 40 pounds by lifting weights 3 times a week for 20 minutes. It really doesn't take much.

667 posted on 11/11/2005 5:07:11 PM PST by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 650 | View Replies]

To: Myrddin

300 / month property taxes on multiple properties in more than one state is not bad at all.


668 posted on 11/11/2005 5:10:21 PM PST by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 665 | View Replies]

To: Myrddin

Excercise does no good if your diet consists of high salt and sugary foods.

How many children suffer with Diabetes now a days? Eating healthy should be government policy by allowing healthy foods to be affordable to the American family with children.


669 posted on 11/11/2005 5:11:10 PM PST by laney (little bit country,little bit Rock and Roll!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 667 | View Replies]

Comment #670 Removed by Moderator

To: willstayfree

It is my belief that had we treated the SE Asian War (I've always hated the term "Vietnam War" due to its belittling of the reality of it) as a must win effort, and avoided idiotic rules of engagement meant to win over 3rd world followers of Bandungers such as Nehru, we ought to have cleaned out N. Vietnam no later than 1966 and Laos and Cambodia no later than 1968. Had we done this we'd have been waving a "hello" to the PLA along over 1000 miles of their southern border and would have prevented even some of the issues we have with them today! LBJ definitely did not have the vision thing, plus, a number of his advisors were essentially - in their hearts - more concerned with taking the late 1940s utopian "world community" notions to the bitter end than they were about rolling back Communism and furthering the interests of the US and our allies S. Vietnam and Thailand. Clarity of vision during that critical time would have made all the difference.


671 posted on 11/11/2005 5:18:04 PM PST by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 654 | View Replies]

To: GOP_1900AD
300 / month property taxes on multiple properties in more than one state is not bad at all.

No, it is $300/month for the single family home where I live in Idaho. There are additional taxes on the other house that are collected as part of the $628 monthly payment to the bank. The fair market rental value for the property is around $750/month. I had to sink $2600 in to replacing the windows as the 1947 vintage wood frame, double hung windows were unattractive and dangerous. Recapturing the capital investment on the windows will have to wait until I either sell it or depreciate it. I'm inclined to hold the property indefinitely at the current time.

672 posted on 11/11/2005 5:19:05 PM PST by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 668 | View Replies]

To: willstayfree
Hmmmmmmm...you said that the Nam War was based on a lie. Just WHAT lie, would that have been? What exactly did JFK ( he, who actually started that war ) lie about? Communists weren't trying to take over Viet Nam? The "DOMINO THERORY" didn't prove to be correct?

I'll grant you, that JFK was talked into cleaning up for the, yet again, cowardly, trashed French; but, be that as it may, the Communists WERE on the march and this was no "war to shake the coils of colonialism". The Viet Cong were to "FREEDOM FIGHTERS", as is Osama bin Laden to being a George Washington.

Was the Nam War was "fought" ( and I use that term lightly ) badly, mismanaged, micromanaged by LBJ, and that bloody McNamara and the laughably called "the best and the brightest", it was a war worth fighting and one we should have and could have won.

Body bags? The deaths of our military, in war time, is a reason to give up, not fight? Too bad that there were no T.V. cameras during WW II then...if any of us were still alive, these posts would all be in German! Oh hey...we should have had T.V. cameras for WW I ( a war we entered late, never should have been in, and fought on the wrong side; but that's a whole 'nother topic ); especially in France! Wanna talk about unnecessary deaths?

All you have are anti-war talking points and propaganda.

673 posted on 11/11/2005 5:22:20 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 632 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator; JamesP81

'71 here. I think JamesP81 is on to something.


674 posted on 11/11/2005 5:22:36 PM PST by I got the rope
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: willstayfree

I must say that although it was good political strategy to win against McCarthy, Nixon's promise to pull out was a grave mistake. Instead he should have pulled a Reagan and done PR during the campaign to turn around the apathy about and antipathy toward the war amongst the Silent Majority. Unfortunately he was not as skilled in PR as Reagan and he did not. If anything, Nixon could have, had he done this, come into the presidency then fixed Johnson's ailing effort and won the war properly. Had he used our best technology, everything with the exception of nukes, I estimate we'd have occupied Hanoi no later than late 1970. We would have had a bit of a challenge cleaning the Reds out of Laos and Cambodia but it would have been doable. May we not repeat Nixon's errors.


675 posted on 11/11/2005 5:24:47 PM PST by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 657 | View Replies]

To: laney

Actually, the problem was, we did not allow ground forces to invade North Vietnam and occupy territory there. Had we allowed that, the war would have been won by us quickly.


676 posted on 11/11/2005 5:26:52 PM PST by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 666 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

WW2 - what, a couple thou dead in one day at Iwo Jima? Indeed, modernity made us into wimps.


677 posted on 11/11/2005 5:29:16 PM PST by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 673 | View Replies]

To: qam1

This author is a TOTAL RETARD, and has the same talking points as the morons in the RAT party. Tax cuts do NOT increase spending. The debt is a function of increased lunatic spending, not a result of "tax cuts".

Even if, (IF), tax cuts reduced revenue, the debt still has its #1 driver as spending, not [less] revenue. Tax cuts generally stimulate revenue (or at least keep it neutral).

It is the GOP's lunatic spending that is driving the debt higher, not the tax cuts.


678 posted on 11/11/2005 5:30:55 PM PST by Dont_Tread_On_Me_888 (Bush's #1 priority Africa. #2 priority appease Fox and Mexico . . . USA priority #64.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: laney
Time was, not all that long ago, when the vast majority of teenagers, boys or girls, didn't engage in sexual intercourse. Your friends ( if this is even true ) are lousy mothers, who long ago gave over all control to their children.

"wether" is spelled WHETHER

Not "I am in the opinion...", but rather, "I am OF the opinion...."

Use spell check and learn some basic grammar, missyme. For a 49 year old/50something, you write like some badly educated 10 year old.

679 posted on 11/11/2005 5:31:04 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 637 | View Replies]

Comment #680 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 641-660661-680681-700 ... 741-746 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson