Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

STICKING TO HER STORY (Mapes "No one has proved that the documents were not authentic")
New York Post ^ | 11/09/05 | Michael Starr

Posted on 11/09/2005 1:16:11 PM PST by conservative in nyc

EX-CBS producer Mary Mapes, fired over a controversial "60 Minutes II" story on President Bush's National Guard service, says she still believes the report was "true" — and accurate.

"No one has proved that the documents were not authentic," Mapes says on this morning's "Good Morning America."

Mapes is breaking her silence to promote her new book, "Truth and Duty: The Press, the President, and the Privilege of Power."

--Snip--

She says she "did not have it in for George Bush" and says she doesn't feel responsible for what happened to her colleagues in the scandal's aftermath.

--Snip--

What Mapes doesn't dispute is the fact that she called a member of John Kerry's presidential campaign before the "60 Minutes II" report aired.

"I wish to God I hadn't done it, because I think it was so widly misinterpreted," she says - adding that she only made the call to curry favor with the source who gave her the disputed documents.

"I don't think that I committed bad journalism. I really don't," she says.

Mapes says she's continuing to investigate the source of the documents.

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: danrather; denial; mapes; marymapes; rather; rathergate; riverinegypt; seebs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last
Mary, Mary, Mary. You claim you are a journalist. We don't need to prove your documents were fake. YOU need to show US that your documents were authentic. And you never have. And you never will. Because your documents were not authentic, unless they were typed on a very expensive machine the Texas Air National guard never had, or the TANG had a time machine and brought back a computer that uses Microsoft Word to the 1970s. YOU have no proof.

Oh and yes, Mary, YOU let your colleagues down, YOU colluded with the Kerry campaign in getting the story out, YOU committed bad journalism, and you're continuing to investigate the source of the documents as much as O.J. is still searching for the real killer.

Bill Burkett used moonbat Bev Harris to try to push the TANG charges as a November surprise in the 2000 elections. There was no proof then. There is no proof now. Perhaps you need to learn to take what political operatives give you during an election with a grain of salt.

1 posted on 11/09/2005 1:16:12 PM PST by conservative in nyc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Buckhead

Jackal on a book tour PING!

Did anyone see the GMA interview?


2 posted on 11/09/2005 1:18:07 PM PST by conservative in nyc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservative in nyc
Mapes says she's continuing to investigate the source of the documents.

Maybe she can team-up with OJ.

3 posted on 11/09/2005 1:18:17 PM PST by randog (What the....?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservative in nyc

And just because we haven't found any, doesn't prove unicorns don't exist...


4 posted on 11/09/2005 1:18:22 PM PST by Welsh Rabbit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #5 Removed by Moderator

To: conservative in nyc

No one can prove I didn't sleep with Angelina Jolie.

Hey! I like how this logic works.


6 posted on 11/09/2005 1:18:57 PM PST by libertarianPA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: randog

ROTF................does she golf??


7 posted on 11/09/2005 1:19:09 PM PST by calrighty (C'mon troops, finish em off!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: conservative in nyc; windcliff

The documents in question were "genuine" forgeries.


8 posted on 11/09/2005 1:19:20 PM PST by I Drive Too Fast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservative in nyc

too stupid to live


9 posted on 11/09/2005 1:19:28 PM PST by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservative in nyc
I think the big story is missed - was the CBS story coordinated with the Demo. National Committee's planned "Operation Fortunate Son" advertisement offensive.
10 posted on 11/09/2005 1:20:17 PM PST by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservative in nyc
"No one has proved that the documents were not authentic..."

Yes...they have. Ya need to get onto FR more often Mary old girl.
Conversely, no one has proven that the documents WERE authentic.

Delusional idiot wench.

11 posted on 11/09/2005 1:21:06 PM PST by Bloody Sam Roberts (Power is nothing without control.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservative in nyc; All
“My friend, you have seen this incident, based on sworn testimony. Can you prove that it didn’t happen?”
12 posted on 11/09/2005 1:21:44 PM PST by dighton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservative in nyc

Didn't I hear somewhere in Logic 101 that you can't prove a negative?

But if those documents were studied by an impartial jury in a court of law, I don't think there's any reasonable doubt that they would find them to be obvious FORGERIES.


13 posted on 11/09/2005 1:21:49 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservative in nyc
New rules of journalism:

Publish anything thing seems like it will sell really well. Use your imagination.

Leave it to a court of law to decide if its true or not. That's what they're there for, right?

14 posted on 11/09/2005 1:22:30 PM PST by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservative in nyc

I hope this dimwit never tries her hand at Science. For every "prove that..." question, she would come up with "Why don't you prove why it shouldn't be so....".

We would still be trying hard to invent the wheel with such brilliant thinking.


15 posted on 11/09/2005 1:23:19 PM PST by raj bhatia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: conservative in nyc

WE DON'T NEED NO STEENKIN' PROOFS! ALL YOU MEDIA IS BELONG TO US!..........


16 posted on 11/09/2005 1:23:41 PM PST by Red Badger (Whatever happened to formulas 1 through 408?.........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservative in nyc
No one has proved that the documents were not authentic

LOL Is that in, "like no one proved OJ killed them."

17 posted on 11/09/2005 1:23:46 PM PST by JimSEA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservative in nyc
Consistency: The hobgoblin of small minds.
18 posted on 11/09/2005 1:24:27 PM PST by PetroniusMaximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservative in nyc
adding that she only made the call to curry favor with the source who gave her the disputed documents.

Is this new? Isn't she basically admitting that she got the forged docs from the Kerry campaign? Or is she saying she called the Kerry campaign to tell them to listen Burket?

19 posted on 11/09/2005 1:25:55 PM PST by robomurph
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservative in nyc
"purchasable at mere two taka"


20 posted on 11/09/2005 1:25:55 PM PST by JoJo Gunn (Help control the Leftist population. Have them spayed or neutered. ©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson