Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Volcanic Suppression: Major Eruptions Can Reduce Sea Level
Science News Online ^ | 11-7-2005 | Sid Perkins

Posted on 11/08/2005 7:28:52 AM PST by blam

Week of Nov. 5, 2005; Vol. 168, No. 19 , p. 294

Volcanic Suppression: Major eruptions can reduce sea level

Sid Perkins

Large volcanic eruptions can temporarily cool Earth's climate and, a team of scientists now suggests, lower sea level worldwide.

BLOWING ITS TOP. Ocean cooling following the June 1991 eruption of Mount Pinatubo in the Philippines caused sea level worldwide to temporarily drop about 5 millimeters. D. Harlow/U.S. Geological Survey

The tiny particles of broken rock and droplets of condensed gases that a volcano ejects high into the atmosphere reflect sunlight into space. So, after an eruption, there's less radiation reaching Earth's surface to warm it, says John A. Church, an oceanographer at the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization in Hobart, Tasmania. In the wake of a major eruption, this deflection of solar energy can cause global air temperatures to drop below average for months.

New analyses by Church and his colleagues suggest that these chilling effects influence the oceans as well. The water would contract as it cooled, with a concomitant drop in sea level.

To estimate the effects of volcanic eruptions on sea level, Church and his colleagues used tide data from around the world, ocean temperature and salinity data gathered by ships, and climate models that include both the atmosphere and the oceans.

After each of several major 20th-century eruptions—including those of Indonesia's Mount Agung in 1963 and the Philippines' Mount Pinatubo in 1991—the oceans cooled subtly for about 18 months, and sea level dropped, on average, several millimeters, or about three times the thickness of a penny. As natural processes scoured the volcanic material from upper levels of the atmosphere, the amount of radiation reaching Earth's surface returned to normal, the oceans warmed and expanded, and sea level recovered over the course of a decade or so.

The analysis by Church's team suggests that after the eruption of Mount Pinatubo, the most powerful one that the researchers examined, sea level dropped about 5 mm but then recovered at a rate of about 0.5 mm per year. Sea level still hadn't fully recovered as of 2000, the last year included in the scientists' analysis. The researchers report their findings in the Nov. 3 Nature.

Between 1950 and 2000, sea level rose, on average, about 1.8 mm/yr. However, scientists using satellite data gathered since 1993 estimate that the rate of sea level rise between 1993 and 2000 was about 3.2 mm/yr. Some of that apparent acceleration can be attributed to post-Pinatubo recovery, says Church.

"I've never thought about how volcanic eruptions would affect sea level, but it makes sense," says Alan Robock, an atmospheric scientist at Rutgers University in New Brunswick, N.J.

Accounting for the temporary effects on sea level of natural phenomena such as volcanic eruptions is essential to accurately predicting sea level rise in response to human-induced climate change, Anny Cazenave of the National Center for Space Studies in Toulouse, France, notes in a commentary accompanying the Nov. 3 Nature article.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: climatechange; eruptions; globalcooling; globalwarming; kyoto; level; major; reduce; sea; suppression; suvs; volcanic

1 posted on 11/08/2005 7:28:54 AM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blam

FIVE MILLIMETERS!!!

We're DOOMED!


2 posted on 11/08/2005 7:29:25 AM PST by RockinRight (It’s likely for a Conservative to be a Republican, but not always the other way around)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

You mean, its effects weren't completely negated by global warming???


3 posted on 11/08/2005 7:30:59 AM PST by SlowBoat407 (The best stuff happens just before the thread snaps.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
How in the hell could they measure a drop in the sea level around the world by 5 mm???
4 posted on 11/08/2005 7:34:24 AM PST by grobdriver (Let the embeds check the bodies!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
lets see...???..take substance from within, spread on outer surface,reduce liquid form on outer surface because harden substance replaces liquid,thus reducing liquid...... wait a second...???..is the sun shinning? Can I get a grant to study this further?


Doogle
5 posted on 11/08/2005 7:37:29 AM PST by Doogle (USAF...7thAF ..4077th TFW...408th MMS..Ubon Thailand.."69",,Night Line Delivery..AMMO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grobdriver
How in the hell could they measure a drop in the sea level around the world by 5 mm???

I wonder what their margin of error is?

6 posted on 11/08/2005 7:40:24 AM PST by bkepley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: grobdriver
How in the hell could they measure a drop in the sea level around the world by 5 mm???

I have often wondered that myself, as I contemplated the difficulty of determining whether a PERCEIVED drop was actually a lowering of the ocean or a raising of the solid-ground point-of-reference! I suppose the ATTEMPT could be made utilizing lasers based in earth orbit; but that is so recent as to render any perceived difference highly suspect.

7 posted on 11/08/2005 7:41:09 AM PST by Migraine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: blam

This is Bush's fault somehow.


8 posted on 11/08/2005 7:45:10 AM PST by Blood of Tyrants (G-d is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Bush's Fault!
9 posted on 11/08/2005 7:45:26 AM PST by SampleMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grobdriver

How did they measure the drop in sea level? I wondered the same thing and then concluded it is a calculation based on the coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) of sea water. CTE is the fractional length change per degree C. For a fixed width and length, it is also the fractional volume change.

The CTE of sea water is about 0.00021. Because the length and width of an ocean basin does not change as the ocean is heated or cooled slightly, b also describes the change in height as the water warms or cools. The relation between change of height D h, ocean depth D and temperature change DT is: D h = b D DT.


10 posted on 11/08/2005 7:45:43 AM PST by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: blam
That happens whenever fat Teddy opens his big yap.

We should be scraping the bottom of the ocean by now.

11 posted on 11/08/2005 7:47:51 AM PST by kstewskis ("I don't know what I know, but I know that it's big..." Jerry Fletcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
these chilling effects influence the oceans as well. The water would contract as it cooled, with a concomitant drop in sea level.

Water contacts when it cools? So, the density increases, the colder the water gets? Which is why ice sinks?

If I had a grant, I could research this.

12 posted on 11/08/2005 7:49:25 AM PST by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom
b also describes the change in height as the water warms or cools

A little elaboration on this, please, and why it is not simple cyclical with seasons.

13 posted on 11/08/2005 7:51:48 AM PST by grobdriver (Let the embeds check the bodies!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SlowBoat407

a number of years ago i read a story that volcanic ash content measured in ice cuttings from greenland showed a significant drop in the last century. like counting the rings of a tree. plus recent articles noted the atmosphere was clearer... all leading to global warming not fossil fuels...


14 posted on 11/08/2005 7:57:57 AM PST by Omglol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
So, the density increases, the colder the water gets? Which is why ice sinks?

The density of water increases as the temperature drops towards 39 degrees Fahrenheit. Below 39 degrees, water again decreases in density. I believe it is the only substance known to man where the density is at its maximum as a liquid and not a solid.

15 posted on 11/08/2005 8:00:32 AM PST by simon says what
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy; All
I believe water expands when it cools....look at a frozen bottle of water spilling out of the top.

This is 3rd grade science, but could we get confirmation from a higher authority.

16 posted on 11/08/2005 8:00:32 AM PST by chiller (Libs prove once again they can not be trusted with power..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: grobdriver
As others explained, water contracts as it cools to 4 deg C. With further cooling, it begins to expand. When water turns to solid ice, just below 0 deg C, its volume is considerably larger (and density lower). Hence it floats. In other words, the Coefficient of Thermal Expansion of water and ice actually changes AND changes sign as a function of temperature.

There's a great explanation of how this works and permits life to continue living in frozen lakes and ponds in a Word document at the University of Sussex.

17 posted on 11/08/2005 8:18:59 AM PST by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom
The CTE of sea water is about 0.00021. Because the length and width of an ocean basin does not change as the ocean is heated or cooled slightly, b also describes the change in height as the water warms or cools.

So far so good...assuming the amount of water didn't change.

However, other factors involved in this would include world rainfall totals; runoff totals; rate of evaporation; any changes in volume of sea ice, any net change in basin size due to rift speading vs magma welling/sea mount building....

18 posted on 11/08/2005 10:23:28 AM PST by ApplegateRanch (Islam: a Satanically Transmitted Disease, spread by unprotected intimate contact with the Koranus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Omglol
"a number of years ago i read a story that volcanic ash content measured in ice cuttings from greenland showed a significant drop in the last century. like counting the rings of a tree. plus recent articles noted the atmosphere was clearer... all leading to global warming not fossil fuels..."

As we get further and further from the end of the Ice Age, I would expect to see less earthquakes and volcanos because the weight redistribution stresses (water - ice) have been released the further we get from the last major event, 8,000 years ago.

19 posted on 11/08/2005 10:51:15 AM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: blam
Major eruptions can reduce sea level

The more important thing is that volcanoes prove Earth's surface can be cooled by putting sun reflectors in the atmosphere. Increasing cloud cover must have the same effect. By inducing cloud generation over the Gulf of Mexico we could cool the earth's surface as well as manage hurricane formation.

Technology solves problems.

20 posted on 11/12/2005 9:36:13 PM PST by Reeses
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson